Literature DB >> 21258126

Down's syndrome: screening and antenatal diagnosis regionally in England and Wales 1989-2008.

E De Souza1, E Alberman, J K Morris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To illustrate regional changes that occurred in screening for Down's syndrome (trisomy 21) in England and Wales from 1989 to 2008.
METHODS: The National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register has collected data on all ante- and postnatal diagnoses of Down's syndrome in England and Wales since 1989 (n = 27,954). The percentages of (i) diagnoses made antenatally, (ii) antenatal diagnoses that had nuchal translucency (NT) measured, and (iii) antenatal diagnoses in mothers aged 37 and over with advanced maternal age as the sole recorded indication for diagnosis are presented according to where the mother lived (Government Office Region), year of diagnosis (1989-1994, 1995-2000, 2001-2006, 2007-2008), and maternal age (<37 years, ≥37 years).
RESULTS: The percentage of cases diagnosed antenatally has increased in younger women but varies between regions. It remained relatively constant at approximately 70% in older women. The use of NT measurement in antenatal screening has expanded rapidly but varies regionally, being most common in London and the South East where, in 2007-2008, over 75% of antenatal diagnoses in older women had NT measured. The sole indication of advanced maternal age has substantially reduced, and was less than 10% in older mothers in all regions in 2007-2008.
CONCLUSIONS: There are regional and maternal age variations in Down's syndrome screening and diagnosis. Some regions used NT measurements, and eliminated advanced maternal age as sole reason for antenatal diagnostic testing more quickly than others. The reasons for variations need to be identified and addressed to ensure that when new screening techniques become available, regional differences are minimized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21258126     DOI: 10.1258/jms.2010.010044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  4 in total

1.  A balancing act: focus on aneuploidy.

Authors:  Nonia Pariente
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Age-related aneuploidy through cohesion exhaustion.

Authors:  Rolf Jessberger
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study.

Authors:  Judith L S Budd; Elizabeth S Draper; Robyn R Lotto; Laura E Berry; Lucy K Smith
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling-Time for a Reassessment of Risk.

Authors:  Caroline Ogilvie; Ranjit Akolekar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.