Literature DB >> 21257902

Radioembolization as salvage therapy for hepatic metastasis of uveal melanoma: a single-institution experience.

Carin F Gonsalves1, David J Eschelman, Kevin L Sullivan, P Rani Anne, Laura Doyle, Takami Sato.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of radioembolization in the management of hepatic metastasis of uveal melanoma after failure of immunoembolization or chemoembolization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2007 through April 2009, 32 patients underwent radioembolization therapy for hepatic metastasis of uveal melanoma. Pretreatment tumor burdens were divided into three categories: less than 25% (n = 25), 25-50% (n = 5), and greater than 50% (n = 2). Toxicity, extrahepatic disease, and hepatic tumor response were assessed 1 month and then every 3 months after treatment. Best radiographic response of hepatic metastasis was determined with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Overall survival and progression-free survival of hepatic metastasis were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Differences in survival between subgroups were evaluated by log-rank test in univariate analysis.
RESULTS: The clinical follow-up period ranged from 1.0 to 29.0 months (median, 10.0 months). The median overall survival was 10.0 months, and the progression-free survival of hepatic metastasis, 4.7 months. Twenty-two patients died 1.0-29.0 months (median, 5.8 months) after treatment owing to progression of liver disease (n = 13), extrahepatic disease (n = 4), or both (n = 5). Patients who had a pretreatment tumor burden less than 25% had longer median overall survival (10.5 vs 3.9 months, p = 0.0003) and progression-free survival (6.4 vs 3.0 months, p = 0.03) than patients who had a pretreatment tumor burden of 25% or greater. Patients who had a complete response (n = 1), partial response (n = 1), or stable disease (n = 18) had longer median overall survival (14.7 vs 4.9 months, p = 0.0006) and progression-free survival of hepatic metastasis (7.9 vs 3.1 months, p < 0.0001) than patients with tumor progression (n = 12). Self-limiting grade 1-2 systemic toxicity included tiredness (n = 9), indigestion (n = 2), and abdominal discomfort (n = 5). Grade 3-4 hepatic toxicity was attributed to tumor progression.
CONCLUSION: Radioembolization is safe and effective salvage therapy for limited metastasis of uveal melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21257902     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  34 in total

Review 1.  Chemoembolization and radioembolization for metastatic disease to the liver: available data and future studies.

Authors:  Khairuddin Memon; Robert J Lewandowski; Ahsun Riaz; Riad Salem
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Current status of transarterial radioembolization.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

Review 3.  Rationale of transcatheter intra-arterial therapies of hepatic cancers.

Authors:  Ryan M Hickey; Robert J Lewandowski; Riad Salem
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-09-09

Review 4.  SIR-Spheres yttrium-90 radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable liver cancers.

Authors:  Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-09-09

5.  90Y glass microspheres for the treatment of unresectable metastatic liver disease from chemotherapy-refractory gastrointestinal cancers: a pilot study.

Authors:  Nicholas Fidelman; Robert K Kerlan; Randall A Hawkins; Andrew G Taylor; Maureen P Kohi; K Pallav Kolli; Emily K Bergsland; R Kate Kelley; Andrew H Ko; W Michael Korn; Ryan M McWhirter; Jennifer Luan; Alan P Venook
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-06

6.  Yttrium-90 Microsphere Brachytherapy for Liver Metastases From Uveal Melanoma: Clinical Outcomes and the Predictive Value of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Harriet Eldredge-Hindy; Nitin Ohri; Pramila R Anne; David Eschelman; Carin Gonsalves; Charles Intenzo; Voichita Bar-Ad; Adam Dicker; Laura Doyle; Jun Li; Takami Sato
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 7.  Transhepatic therapies for metastatic uveal melanoma.

Authors:  David J Eschelman; Carin F Gonsalves; Takami Sato
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Results of a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Phase III Trial of Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion Compared with Best Available Care for Patients with Melanoma Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Marybeth S Hughes; Jonathan Zager; Mark Faries; H Richard Alexander; Richard E Royal; Bradford Wood; Junsung Choi; Kevin McCluskey; Eric Whitman; Sanjiv Agarwala; Gary Siskin; Charles Nutting; Mary Ann Toomey; Carole Webb; Tatiana Beresnev; James F Pingpank
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Effects of Yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy on non-conventional liver tumors.

Authors:  Andrew Kuei; Sammy Saab; Sung-Ki Cho; Stephen T Kee; Edward Wolfgang Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Uveal melanoma: From diagnosis to treatment and the science in between.

Authors:  Chandrani Chattopadhyay; Dae Won Kim; Dan S Gombos; Junna Oba; Yong Qin; Michelle D Williams; Bita Esmaeli; Elizabeth A Grimm; Jennifer A Wargo; Scott E Woodman; Sapna P Patel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.