Literature DB >> 21257668

Injuries and illnesses of football players during the 2010 FIFA World Cup.

Jiri Dvorak1, Astrid Junge, Wayne Derman, Martin Schwellnus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence and characteristics of football injuries during matches in top-level international tournaments are well documented, but training injuries and illnesses during this period have rarely been studied. AIM: To analyse the incidence and characteristics of injuries and illnesses incurred during the 2010 Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup.
METHODS: The chief physicians of the 32 finalist teams reported daily all newly incurred injuries and illnesses of their players on a standardised medical report form.
RESULTS: Out of 229 injuries reported, 82 match and 58 training injuries were expected to result in time loss, equivalent to an incidence of 40.1 match and 4.4 training injuries per 1000 h. Contact with another player was the most frequent cause of match (65%) and of training (40%) injuries. The most frequent diagnoses were thigh strain and ankle sprain. 99 illnesses of 89 (12%) players were reported. Illnesses were mainly infections of the respiratory or the digestive system. Most illnesses did not result in absence from training or match. The incidence of time-loss illnesses was 3.0 per 1000 player days.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of match injuries during the 2010 FIFA World Cup was significantly lower than in the three proceeding World Cups. This might be a result of more regard to injury prevention, less foul play and stricter refereeing. Tackling skills and fair play need to be improved to prevent contact injuries in training and matches. Prevention of illness should focus on reducing the risk of infections by considering the common modes of transmission and environmental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21257668      PMCID: PMC3106974          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.079905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


Injury and illness surveillance studies are an integral part in the effort to protect athletes' health.1–3 It provides not only important information on the number, characteristics and causes of the health problems and directions for their prevention, but also the opportunity for monitoring long-term changes in their occurrence. Innovations (eg, artificial turf or new rules) and the effects of preventive interventions can thus be evaluated. The Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) started in 1998 to survey all injuries incurred during their competitions,1 and other international sports federations followed the model of FIFA Medical Assessment and Research Centre (F-MARC).4–8 Based on their experiences, an international expert group from F-MARC, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA), the International Ice Hockey Federation and the International Olympic Committee developed a surveillance system for injuries,9–11 and extended it in a second step also to include illnesses.12–14 The incidence and characteristics of football injuries during matches in top-level international tournaments such as the Olympic Games, European Championships and World Cups are well documented,1–4 7 while training injuries and illness during the competitions have rarely been studied.4 7 The incidence of time-loss injuries in matches were 50.7 injuries per 1000 h in the 2002 FIFA World Cup,3 45.9 in the 2006 FIFA World Cup,2 36.0 in EURO 20047 and 41.6 in EURO 2008.4 The incidence of training injuries at the European Championships varied between 0 and 3.9 time-loss injuries per 1000 training hours.4 7 In a prospective study on the illnesses of elite football players,15 the incidence was 2.5 complaints per player per season, and approximately 20% resulted in absence. Almost all complaints were classified as upper respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses.15 In a pilot study during the FIFA Confederations Cup 2009, the incidence of illness was 16.5 per 1000 player days, and more than 60% were affected in the respiratory tract (Schwellnus MP, Dvorak J, Derman W, et al. Medical conditions and illnesses in elite football players during international competition: a pilot study, personal communication). The aim of the present study is to analyse the incidence and characteristics of (match and training) injuries and illness in football players participating in the 2010 FIFA World Cup in order to direct future prevention initiatives.

Methods

The applied methodology combined the FIFA injury reporting1 and the International Olympic Committee injury and illness surveillance10 systems to allow comparison with previous studies. The injury definition and data collection procedure were in accordance with the respective consensus statement for football injuries.16 The definition of injury was identical to the one used in previous FIFA competitions2 3 9 but extended to training injuries. An injury was defined as ‘any musculoskeletal complaint and concussion newly incurred due to competition or training during the 2010 FIFA World Cup™.’ The definition of an illness was developed based on the injury definition and had proved feasible in the 2009 FIFA Confederation Cup, the 2009 world championships of FINA and IAAF as well as during the 2010 Winter Olympics.12–14 An illness was defined as ‘any physical complaint (unrelated to injury) newly incurred during the 2010 FIFA World Cup™’. Chronic preexisting illnesses were not included unless there was an exacerbation requiring medical attention during the study period. The medical report form was almost identical to the form that was developed for the 2009 IAAF and FINA championships, as well as the 2010 Winter Olympic games.12–14 However, the form was slightly modified to: (1) collect football-specific information on cause of injury (the coding used was in accordance with previous FIFA competitions); (2) include codes for illness using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision system; and (3) include the duration of the daily training. The chief physicians of the 32 finalist teams received detailed information about the study during the medical meeting held in February 2010. As part of the preparation, written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all the players. Upon their arrival in South Africa, each team physician received a booklet of daily medical report forms and was requested to complete one form daily starting on the first day of the World Cup (11 June) until the team leaves the competition. The completed forms were collected by a FIFA medical officer after each match during doping control. Confidentiality of all information was ensured and no individual player or team could be identified. Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town (ref. no. REC 159/2009). The 64 matches of the 2010 FIFA World Cup were played from 11 June to 11 July in 10 different venues in South Africa. The 32 participating finalist teams with 23 players each comprised a total of 736 players. The number of matches per team varied between three and seven, and thus the duration of the competition for teams varied between 12 and 31 days. In total, the study period included 13 179 player days. Response rate, exposure time and incidences were calculated in accordance with the consensus statement and previous studies.1 10 16 Match exposure was calculated by multiplying 1.5 h by 11 players by the number of returned forms. Training exposure was calculated by multiplying the sum of the daily training times of all teams by 23 players. The number of player days was calculated by adding the number of days each team participated (starting on 11 June to the last match of the team) multiplying by 23 players. For incidence rates, 95% CI were calculated as the incidence ±1.96 times the incidence divided by the square root of the number of injuries. Data were processed using Excel and SPSS. The statistical methods applied were frequencies, cross-tabulations and χ2 test. Significance was accepted at the 5% level.

Results

Response rate and exposure time

The team physicians of all 32 finalist teams (comprising 736 players) participated in the study. In total, 553 daily medical report forms were returned, equivalent to an overall response rate of 97.4%. From match days, four medical reports were missing, resulting in a response rate of 96.9% or 2046 player hours. For the other days, 429 (97.5%) forms were returned, but on 54 (12.3%) forms training hours were not reported and on six they were not legible. A total of 490.8 h of team training were reported (and it can be estimated that 81.4 were missing), which is equivalent to 13 160 player hours training.

Match injuries

In total, 125 injuries were reported from the 64 matches, resulting in an average of 2.0 injuries per match (95% CI 1.7 to 2.3) or 61.1 per 1000 match hours (95% CI 50.4 to 71.8). More than a third of the injuries (35.5%, 44 of 124) were incurred without contact with another player and 64.5% were contact injuries. Less than a quarter (22.5%) of contact injuries or 14.4% of all injuries were caused by foul play based on the judgement of the team physician. In the first half of the match, 36 (30.5%) injuries occurred, more than twice as many (79; 66.9%) in the second half and three (2.5%) injuries during overtime/extra time (information missing for seven injuries, see figure 1).
Figure 1

Number of injuries during the course of the match (n=114; for four injuries in the second half the exact minute was not specified; for seven injuries information is missing).

Number of injuries during the course of the match (n=114; for four injuries in the second half the exact minute was not specified; for seven injuries information is missing). The injuries most frequently affected the lower extremity (92; 73.6%) followed by the head/neck (13; 10.4%), upper extremity (12; 9.6%) and the trunk (8; 6.4%). The most frequent diagnoses were contusion of thigh and lower leg and thigh strain (table 1).
Table 1

Location and diagnosis of match and training injuries (n=229)

Match injuriesTraining injuries
Location and diagnosisAllWith absenceAllWith absence
Head/neck13463
 Concussion1110
 Fracture of os nasalis1100
 Contusion4120
 Laceration6011
 Dental fracture1100
 Muscle cramps (neck)0022
Upper extremity12642
 Fracture1000
 Sprain4300
 Contusion4310
 Laceration0010
 Arthritis2000
 Others/not specified1*22
Trunk85104
 Contusion5230
 Sprain/strain2211
 Others1163*
Hip2111
 Contusion1000
 Tendinosis/tendinopathy1100
 Impingement0011
Groin4433
 Muscle strain3311
 Tendonitis1111
 Muscle cramps0011
Thigh36251913
 Muscle strain/rupture1110119
 Contusion12621
 Muscle cramps/tightness9732
 Laceration0010
 Others4221
Knee96169
 Sprain4333
 Tendinosis/tendinopathy0021
 Arthritis0043
 Contusion3141
 Laceration2200
 Others0031
Lower leg1912189
 Muscle strain/rupture6521
 Contusion11592
 Laceration, abrasion0033
 Muscle cramps0022
 Others2221
Ankle1512178
 Fracture and sprain1100
 Ligament rupture1100
 Sprain64*128*
 Contusion7650*
Foot77106
 Fracture1100
 Contusion6663
 Abrasion0011
 Others0032

Information was missing for at least one injury.

Location and diagnosis of match and training injuries (n=229) Information was missing for at least one injury. Approximately a third of the injuries (39; 34.8%) did not prevent the player from training or match play. Half of the injuries (59; 52.7%) resulted in absence from sport of 1–3 days, nine injuries (8.0%) in absence of 4–7 days, and three (2.7%) resulted in absence of 10 days. Two fractures of the foot/ankle had an expected rehabilitation time of more than a month. For nine injuries, time loss was expected but the duration was not specified. For four injuries (two ankle sprains, one medial collateral ligament sprain and an unspecified shoulder injury) no information on time loss was provided. On average, 1.3 time-loss injuries per match (95% CI 1.0 to 1.6) or 40.1 per 100 match hours (95% CI 31.4 to 48.8) were reported.

Training injuries

A total of 104 injuries was incurred during training sessions, equivalent to 7.9 per 1000 player hours (95% CI 6.4 to 9.4). The cause of injury was classified as overuse in 25 (24.0%) cases, as recurrence of a previous injury in 12 (11.5%) cases and as non-contact trauma in 24 (23.1%) cases. Forty-two injuries (40.4%) were caused by contact with another player (including 12 injuries caused by foul play), and one injury was attributed to contact with the ball. The most frequent diagnoses were ankle sprain and thigh strain (table 1). Approximately half (58; 57.4%) of the injuries were expected to result in absence from training or match (no information regarding time loss was provided for three injuries). The duration of absence was estimated to be 1–3 days for 44 (43.6%) injuries, 4–7 days for five (5.0%) injuries and more than a week but less than a month for six (5.9%) injuries. A thigh strain was expected to result in time loss of a month. For two thigh sprains the duration of time loss was not specified. The incidence of time-loss training injuries was 4.4 per 1000 training hours (95% CI 3.3 to 5.5).

Illnesses

Ninety-nine illnesses were reported in 89 players (12.1% of all players) and this was equivalent to 135 per 1000 players or 7.7 per 1000 player days (95% CI 6.2 to 9.2). The majority of illnesses affected either the respiratory (40; 40.4%) or the digestive (26; 26.3%) system. The most frequent diagnoses were acute upper respiratory tract infection (31; 31.3%) and gastroenteritis (21; 21.2%) followed by sleep disorders (10; 10.1%). In half of the cases (50; 50.5%), the main symptom was pain either solely (35; 35.4%) or in combination with fever (five), diarrhoea/vomiting (five) dyspnoea/cough (three) or other symptoms (two). A total of 14 (14.1%) illnesses was associated with fever. The cause of most illnesses was either infection (60; 60.6%) or environmental (23; 23.2%). Other causes of illness were rare (exercise-induced (four), pre-existing sleep disorder (two), others (nine), not specified (one)). The most common treatments were antibiotics (37; 37.4%) either as monotherapy (14; 14.1%) or in combination with other drugs (22; 22.2%), and oral analgesics (24; 24.2%) either as monotherapy (seven; 7.1%) or in combination (17; 17.2%). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (9.1%) were given for four infections of the respiratory system, three dental problems and two other illnesses. In the majority of cases (63; 63.6%) a single treatment was prescribed, the most frequent combination (10; 10.1%) was antibiotics and oral analgesics. More than half (55; 59.1%) of the illnesses did not result in absence from training or match, and 36 (38.7%) in absence of 1–3 days. For six illnesses time loss was not specified. The most severe illnesses were urethritis/nephritis and an infected anal fistula, both were expected to cause 5 days of absence from sport. The incidence of time-loss illnesses was 3.0 per 1000 player days (95% CI 2.0 to 4.0), and the expected duration of a time-loss illness was on average 1.76 days (SD 0.94).

Discussion

Starting at the World Cup 1998, F-MARC has surveyed match injuries in all 44 subsequent FIFA competitions.1 Thanks to the team physicians' excellent compliance, a high response rate and good quality data were obtained.1–3 This database enables comparison between competitions for different age, gender and skill levels and over time. Other sports federations adapted the F-MARC injury surveillance system for their sports, so that injury and illness data can now also be compared between different sports.5 6 9 10 12 14 The incidence of match injuries during the 2010 FIFA World Cup was significantly lower than the average of the three previous World Cups (2.4; 95% CI 2.2 to 2.6),1–3 and also the incidence of time-loss injuries was lower than in any of those competitions (figure 2). In general, the location and type of injuries was similar to the previous World Cups, but a tendency of less knee and more thigh injuries was observed.1–3 However, the cause of injury differed substantially from the previous World Cups, with more injuries caused without contact (2010: 36%; 2002 and 2006: 27%).2 3 This might be due to the overload of the players with too many matches, as discussed previously.18 This theory is further supported by the observation that in the recent World Cup not only was a higher proportion of injuries incurred in the second half than in previous World Cups (2010: 69%; 1998–2006: 50–54%) but also the number of injuries increased progressively during the course of the match (figure 1).1–3 In the 2010 FIFA World Cup only 23% of the contact injuries were caused by foul play based on the judgement of the team physician. This percentage is substantially lower than in 2006 (61%)2 and 2002 (51%).3 This result, however, should be interpreted with caution because the documentation of injury cause was different in 2010 than in the previous competitions. Therefore, this aspect should be evaluated further using video analysis of the injury situations.
Figure 2

Average number of injuries per match in Fédération Internationale de Football Association World Cups 1998–2010 (grey: all injuries; black: time-loss injuries).1–3

Average number of injuries per match in Fédération Internationale de Football Association World Cups 1998–2010 (grey: all injuries; black: time-loss injuries).1–3 The evidence of decreasing injury incidence during FIFA World Cups since 1998 is the contribution of medicine and science to ‘development of the game’, a key objective of FIFA and an important factor for the future promotion of football as a health-enhancing leisure activity. Based upon the data it can be assumed that a further reduction of injuries could be reached by appropriate preparation for the competition, including the F-MARC prevention programme ‘the 11+’,18 strict application of the laws of the game by referees, and finally by changing attitudes towards ‘fair play’ by the coaches and players. Training injuries differed substantially from match injuries with respect to diagnosis (table 1) and cause, but not in severity. While it could be expected that training injuries were more often as a result of overuse and non-contact trauma than match injuries, it was interesting to note that 12 training injuries were reported to be caused by foul play. Six of these injuries were reported from one team. The incidence of time-loss training injuries was similar to those at the European Championships (1.3–3.9 per 1000 training hours).4 7 An illness was reported in 12% of the players during the period of the 2010 FIFA World Cup. At the 2009 FINA World Championships (aquatics)14 7.1% of the registered athletes, at the 2009 IAAF World Championships in athletics12 6.7%, and at the 2010 Winter Olympic Games13 6.7% were reported to have had an illness. These figures should, however, not be compared because of the varying duration of the championships. To compare different championships, incidences of illness should be expressed per 1000 athlete days. For the 2009 world championships in athletics,12 an illness incidence of 7.6 per 1000 athlete days could be estimated, which is similar to that in the present study. In the FIFA Confederations Cup 2009, however, the incidence of illness was 16.5 per 1000 player days (Schwellnus MP, Dvorak J, Derman W, et al. Medical conditions and illnesses in elite football players during international competition: a pilot study, personal communication). In all quoted studies,12–14 the respiratory system was affected mostly, pain was the most frequent symptom, and infection the most frequent cause, as also observed during the 2010 FIFA World Cup. The gastrointestinal system was the second most affected in aquatics,14 winter sports13 and football, whereas it was the cardiovascular system in athletics12 (probably due to the hot weather during that championships). At the recent football World Cup, only 4% of the illnesses were classified as exercise-induced compared with 29% at the athletic world championships in Berlin.12 The incidence and expected duration of time-loss illnesses at the 2010 FIFA World Cup seem similar or lower than in elite football players during the season.15

Conclusion

The incidence of match injuries during the 2010 FIFA World Cup was significantly lower than in three proceeding World Cups, but the proportion of non-contact injuries has increased. This might be a result of more regard to injury prevention in training, less foul play and stricter refereeing. Contact with another player was the most frequent cause of match and training injuries. Therefore, tackling skills and fair play need to be improved to prevent injuries. Illnesses were a minor problem, and most were infections of the respiratory or the digestive system. Their prevention should thus focus on the common modes of transmission and the environmental conditions. The incidence of match injuries was 2.7 per match in the 2002 FIFA World Cup and 2.3 in the 2006 FIFA World Cup. Most match injuries are caused by contact with another player. Frequent types of match injuries are thigh strains and ankle sprains. The incidence of match injuries constantly decreased from the 2002 FIFA World Cup to 2006 and further in 2010 (2.0 injuries per match; 95% CI 1.7 to 2.3). Training injuries are frequent during the competition period, and 40% were incurred due to contact with another player. Illnesses were mainly infections of the respiratory or the digestive system. Most illnesses did not result in absence from training or match, and the expected duration of a time-loss illness was on average 1.8 days.
  18 in total

1.  Football injuries at Asian tournaments.

Authors:  Young Sul Yoon; Michelle Chai; Dong Won Shin
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Football injuries during FIFA tournaments and the Olympic Games, 1998-2001: development and implementation of an injury-reporting system.

Authors:  Astrid Junge; Jiri Dvorak; Toni Graf-Baumann; Lars Peterson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Football injuries during the World Cup 2002.

Authors:  Astrid Junge; Jiri Dvorak; Toni Graf-Baumann
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  A congested football calendar and the wellbeing of players: correlation between match exposure of European footballers before the World Cup 2002 and their injuries and performances during that World Cup.

Authors:  J Ekstrand; M Waldén; M Hägglund
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Medical report from the 2006 FIFA World Cup Germany.

Authors:  Jiri Dvorak; Astrid Junge; Katharina Grimm; Donald Kirkendall
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Injuries in team sport tournaments during the 2004 Olympic Games.

Authors:  Astrid Junge; Gijs Langevoort; Andrew Pipe; Annie Peytavin; Fook Wong; Margo Mountjoy; Gianfranco Beltrami; Robert Terrell; Manfred Holzgraefe; Richard Charles; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Football injuries during European Championships 2004-2005.

Authors:  Markus Waldén; Martin Hägglund; Jan Ekstrand
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Handball injuries during major international tournaments.

Authors:  G Langevoort; G Myklebust; J Dvorak; A Junge
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures in studies of football (soccer) injuries.

Authors:  Colin W Fuller; Jan Ekstrand; Astrid Junge; Thor E Andersen; Roald Bahr; Jiri Dvorak; Martin Hägglund; Paul McCrory; Willem H Meeuwisse
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.638

Review 10.  Injury surveillance in multi-sport events: the International Olympic Committee approach.

Authors:  A Junge; L Engebretsen; J M Alonso; P Renström; M Mountjoy; M Aubry; J Dvorak
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  40 in total

Review 1.  Science and medicine applied to soccer refereeing: an update.

Authors:  Matthew Weston; Carlo Castagna; Franco M Impellizzeri; Mario Bizzini; A Mark Williams; Warren Gregson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Football injuries of the ankle: A review of injury mechanisms, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Raymond J Walls; Keir A Ross; Ethan J Fraser; Christopher W Hodgkins; Niall A Smyth; Christopher J Egan; James Calder; John G Kennedy
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-01-18

3.  Injury rates in team sport events: tackling challenges in assessing exposure time.

Authors:  Steven D Stovitz; Ian Shrier
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Injury incidence in a spanish sub-elite professional football team: a prospective study during four consecutive seasons.

Authors:  Javier Mallo; Pablo González; Santiago Veiga; Enrique Navarro
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 5.  How effective are exercise-based injury prevention programmes for soccer players? : A systematic review.

Authors:  A M C van Beijsterveldt; Nick van der Horst; Ingrid G L van de Port; Frank J G Backx
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus in an athletic population.

Authors:  Ethan J Fraser; Mark C Harris; Marcelo P Prado; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Injury mechanism of midfacial fractures in football causes in over 40% typical neurological symptoms of minor brain injuries.

Authors:  Volker Krutsch; Markus Gesslein; Oliver Loose; Johannes Weber; Michael Nerlich; Axel Gaensslen; Viktor Bonkowsky; Werner Krutsch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Cailbhe Doherty; Eamonn Delahunt; Brian Caulfield; Jay Hertel; John Ryan; Chris Bleakley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Epidemiology of Head Injuries Focusing on Concussions in Team Contact Sports: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Annika Prien; Alexander Grafe; Roland Rössler; Astrid Junge; Evert Verhagen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Determination of future prevention strategies in elite track and field: analysis of Daegu 2011 IAAF Championships injuries and illnesses surveillance.

Authors:  Juan-Manuel Alonso; Pascal Edouard; Giuseppe Fischetto; Bob Adams; Frédéric Depiesse; Margo Mountjoy
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.