Literature DB >> 21257316

Management of less-than-severe mitral regurgitation: should guidelines recommend earlier surgical intervention?

Rakesh M Suri1, Jean-Francois Aviernos, Joseph A Dearani, Douglas W Mahoney, Hector I Michelena, Hartzell V Schaff, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It is well accepted that patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) benefit from mitral valve repair; however, the management of those with less than severe leakage is controversial. Watchful waiting is often advocated and considered safe, but the risk of developing left ventricular (LV) dysfunction under medical management is unknown.
METHODS: Using a population-based County-wide study database, we analyzed echocardiograms during clinical follow-up and medical management of 204 patients with mitral valve prolapse and less-than-severe MR. LV dysfunction was defined per American Heart Association guidelines as an ejection fraction (EF) <60% or LV end-systolic dimension > 40 mm.
RESULTS: At index examination, mean age was 57 years and 121 (59%) were women. The mean EF was 62%, and 62 (30%) had evidence of LV dysfunction. MR severity was mild in 121 (59%), mild-moderate in 23 (11%), moderate in 36 (18%) and moderate-severe in 24 (12%). During follow-up (mean 8.6 years), 79 patients (39%) demonstrated progression of MR by at least one grade. Greater degrees of regurgitation at index echocardiogram were associated with greater progression during follow-up (P=0.0001). After adjusting for age, sex, body surface area (BSA), and baseline regurgitation grade, multivariable modeling revealed that larger LV end-diastolic dimension (odds ratio (OR)=1.14; P=0.0018) and greater diastolic septal thickness (OR=1.40; P=0.0211) predicted greater progression of MR with time. From initial diagnosis to follow-up echocardiography, EF declined, while left-heart dimensions and pulmonary arterial pressure increased. Of the 142 patients with normal baseline LV function, 52% developed either worsening MR or de novo LV dysfunction. Importantly, even in the 87 patients with stable regurgitation, 18 (21%) developed new LV dysfunction during follow-up. Fifty-two patients (25%) eventually underwent mitral valve repair. Following surgery, there were significant decreases in EF, LV end-diastolic dimensions and LV mass; while 11 developed de novo LV dysfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: Over half of patients with chronic persistent, but sub-severe MR due to mitral leaflet prolapse develop LV dysfunction or worsening regurgitation despite optimal medical management. LV deterioration can occur even in the absence of MR progression. These data advocate for the development of detailed guidelines supporting frequent echocardiographic monitoring and the identification of earlier triggers for surgical consideration prior to the development of LV dysfunction in this patient population.
Copyright © 2010 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21257316     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

Review 1.  Left Ventricular Remodeling in Non-syndromic Mitral Valve Prolapse: Volume Overload or Concomitant Cardiomyopathy?

Authors:  Lobke L Pype; Philippe B Bertrand; Bernard P Paelinck; Hein Heidbuchel; Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck; Caroline M Van De Heyning
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-12

2.  Quantitative evaluation of change in coexistent mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  David J Kaczorowski; John W Macarthur; Jessica Howard; Dale Kobrin; Alex Fairman; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Disruption of desmin-mitochondrial architecture in patients with regurgitant mitral valves and preserved ventricular function.

Authors:  Mustafa I Ahmed; Jason L Guichard; Rajasekaran Namakkal Soorappan; Shama Ahmad; Nithya Mariappan; Silvio Litovsky; Himanshu Gupta; Steven G Lloyd; Thomas S Denney; Pamela Cox Powell; Inmaculada Aban; James Collawn; James E Davies; David C McGiffin; Louis J Dell'Italia
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  How do we use imaging to aid considerations for intervention in patients with severe mitral regurgitation?

Authors:  Randolph P Martin
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11

5.  Vector flow mapping analysis of left ventricular energetic performance in healthy adult volunteers.

Authors:  Koichi Akiyama; Sachiko Maeda; Tasuku Matsuyama; Atsushi Kainuma; Maki Ishii; Yoshifumi Naito; Mao Kinoshita; Saeko Hamaoka; Hideya Kato; Yasufumi Nakajima; Naotoshi Nakamura; Keiichi Itatani; Teiji Sawa
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Mitral valve repair: the chordae tendineae.

Authors:  Carlos-A Mestres; José M Bernal
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2012-08-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.