Literature DB >> 21257167

Comparison of different estimation techniques for biomass concentration in large scale yeast fermentation.

A Hocalar1, M Türker, C Karakuzu, U Yüzgeç.   

Abstract

In this study, previously developed five different state estimation methods are examined and compared for estimation of biomass concentrations at a production scale fed-batch bioprocess. These methods are i. estimation based on kinetic model of overflow metabolism; ii. estimation based on metabolic black-box model; iii. estimation based on observer; iv. estimation based on artificial neural network; v. estimation based on differential evaluation. Biomass concentrations are estimated from available measurements and compared with experimental data obtained from large scale fermentations. The advantages and disadvantages of the presented techniques are discussed with regard to accuracy, reproducibility, number of primary measurements required and adaptation to different working conditions. Among the various techniques, the metabolic black-box method seems to have advantages although the number of measurements required is more than that for the other methods. However, the required extra measurements are based on commonly employed instruments in an industrial environment. This method is used for developing a model based control of fed-batch yeast fermentations.
Copyright © 2010 ISA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21257167     DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2010.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISA Trans        ISSN: 0019-0578            Impact factor:   5.468


  2 in total

1.  Improved synchronous light scattering method for measuring baker's yeast biomass using thickened suspensions.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Xiangfeng Guo; Lihua Jia; Ying Ding
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Estimation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii biomass concentration from chord length distribution data.

Authors:  Patricio Lopez-Exposito; Angeles Blanco Suarez; Carlos Negro
Journal:  J Appl Phycol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.215

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.