Literature DB >> 21256865

A sorting system with automated gates permits individual operant experiments with mice from a social home cage.

York Winter1, Andrea T U Schaefers.   

Abstract

Behavioral experiments based on operant procedures can be time-consuming for small amounts of data. While individual testing and handling of animals can influence attention, emotion, and behavior, and interfere with experimental outcome, many operant protocols require individual testing. We developed an RFID-technology- and transponder-based sorting system that allows removing the human factor for longer-term experiments. Identity detectors and automated gates route mice individually from their social home cage to an adjacent operant compartment with 24/7 operation. CD1-mice learnt quickly to individually pass through the sorting system. At no time did more than a single mouse enter the operant compartment. After 3 days of adjusting to the sorting system, groups of 4 mice completed about 50 experimental trials per day in the operant compartment without experimenter intervention. The automated sorting system eliminates handling, isolation, and disturbance of the animals, eliminates experimenter-induced variability, saves experimenter time, and is financially economical. It makes possible a new approach for high-throughput experimentation, and is a viable tool for increasing quality and efficiency of many behavioral and neurobiological investigations. It can connect a social home cage, through individual sorting automation, to diverse setups including classical operant chambers, mazes, or arenas with video-based behavior classification. Such highly automated systems will permit efficient high-throughput screening even for transgenic animals with only subtle neurological or psychiatric symptoms where elaborate or longer-term protocols are required for behavioral diagnosis.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21256865     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  15 in total

Review 1.  Big behavioral data: psychology, ethology and the foundations of neuroscience.

Authors:  Alex Gomez-Marin; Joseph J Paton; Adam R Kampff; Rui M Costa; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Spatial cognition in a virtual reality home-cage extension for freely moving rodents.

Authors:  Ursula Kaupert; Kay Thurley; Katja Frei; Francesco Bagorda; Alexej Schatz; Gilad Tocker; Sophie Rapoport; Dori Derdikman; York Winter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Cellular resolution functional imaging in behaving rats using voluntary head restraint.

Authors:  Benjamin B Scott; Carlos D Brody; David W Tank
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Determining the value of preferred goods based on consumer demand in a home-cage based test for mice.

Authors:  Pia Kahnau; Anne Jaap; Kai Diederich; Lorenz Gygax; Juliane Rudeck; Lars Lewejohann
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 5.  The surveillance state of behavioral automation.

Authors:  Andreas T Schaefer; Adam Claridge-Chang
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Co-housing rodents with different coat colours as a simple, non-invasive means of individual identification: validating mixed-strain housing for C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice.

Authors:  Michael Walker; Carole Fureix; Rupert Palme; Georgia Mason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An Automated, Experimenter-Free Method for the Standardised, Operant Cognitive Testing of Rats.

Authors:  Marion Rivalan; Humaira Munawar; Anna Fuchs; York Winter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessing mouse behaviour throughout the light/dark cycle using automated in-cage analysis tools.

Authors:  Rasneer S Bains; Sara Wells; Rowland R Sillito; J Douglas Armstrong; Heather L Cater; Gareth Banks; Patrick M Nolan
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  The Yin and Yang of Nicotine: Harmful during Development, Beneficial in Adult Patient Populations.

Authors:  Danielle S Counotte; August B Smit; Sabine Spijker
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 10.  Structured evaluation of rodent behavioral tests used in drug discovery research.

Authors:  Anders Hånell; Niklas Marklund
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.