Literature DB >> 21256653

Symptoms before periapical surgery related to histologic diagnosis and postoperative healing at 12 months for 178 periapical lesions.

María Peñarrocha1, Celia Carrillo, Miguel Peñarrocha, David Peñarrocha, Thomas von Arx, Francisco Vera.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative signs and symptoms with the histologic diagnosis and postoperative healing at 12 months for 178 periapical lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 152 patients who had undergone periapical surgery from 2005 to 2008 were studied. The study included patients presenting with signs and symptoms before periapical surgery with a sufficient tissue sample (periapical lesion) for histologic analysis and a minimal follow-up of 12 months. The signs and symptoms present in the soft tissues at the initial examination were recorded. The histologic analysis established the diagnosis as granuloma, cyst, or scar tissue. The postoperative healing at 12 months was evaluated according to the criteria of von Arx and Kurt.
RESULTS: Of the 152 patients, 147, with 178 periapical lesions, were included in the present study. No significant relationship was found between the preoperative signs and symptoms, lesion type, and evolution. However, scar tissues were asymptomatic in 78.1%, and 36.4% of granulomas were painful. Of the 8 cysts, 50% were asymptomatic and 50% caused pain. Fibrous scars created no soft tissue alterations in 68.7%. Granulomas had fistulized in 31.7%, and 75% of cysts had produced no alterations. The lesions with swelling had worse healing, and those with no soft tissue alterations had better postoperative healing.
CONCLUSIONS: Chronic periapical lesions (granuloma, cyst, and scar tissue) are usually asymptomatic and do not create soft tissue alterations. However, they can deteriorate, producing pain and fistulization. Worse postoperative healing was observed for lesions with swelling, although the difference was not significant.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21256653     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  4 in total

1.  Outcome of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic microsurgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Minji Kang; Hoi In Jung; Minju Song; Sue Youn Kim; Hyeon-Cheol Kim; Euiseong Kim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alba Sánchez-Torres; Ma Ángeles Sánchez-Garcés; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-07-01

Review 3.  Bone Regenerative Biomaterials in Periapical Surgery: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ananad Sumangali; Amruta C Naik; Nimisha Mohan; Nivedita Gautam; Surbhi Abrol; Mohammed Mustafa; Heena Tiwari
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

4.  Clinicopathological study of periapical scars.

Authors:  Yi-Pang Lee; Ming-Jay Hwang; Yang-Che Wu; Ming-Jane Lang; Yu-Hsueh Wu; Chun-Pin Chiang
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.080

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.