Literature DB >> 21256520

Critical outcome analysis of staged buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for prior failed hypospadias repair in children.

Bruno Leslie1, Armando J Lorenzo, Victor Figueroa, Katherine Moore, Walid A Farhat, Darius J Bägli, Joao L Pippi Salle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although staged buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty is a well accepted technique for salvage urethroplasty, there are few reports on this procedure for redo hypospadias repair in children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent staged buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for redo hypospadias repair. Age, quality of graft before tubularization, meatal position, presence of balanitis xerotica obliterans and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 30 patients underwent 32 repairs during a 5-year period. Mean age at first stage was 7 years (range 1 to 17) and mean interval between stages was 9.3 months (5 to 13). Mean followup after second stage was 25 months (range 10 to 46). Meatal position before first stage was proximal in 44% of patients, mid shaft in 39% and distal in 16%. Nine patients had biopsy proved balanitis xerotica obliterans. There were no donor site complications. Four patients underwent a redo grafting procedure. Complications after second stage occurred in 11 of 32 repairs (34%), consisting of urethral stenosis in 5, glanular dehiscence in 3 and urethrocutaneous fistula in 3. A third of the patients had some degree of graft fibrosis/induration after the first stage. These patients were prone to more complications at second stage (9 of 11, 82%), compared to patients without these unfavorable findings (4 of 21, 19%; p<0.001). Presence of balanitis xerotica obliterans and meatal position were not significant factors associated with adverse outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Staged buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty is a suitable technique for salvage urethroplasty. Complications after second stage were seen in approximately a third of patients, mainly those with fibrotic/indurated grafts.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21256520     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  [Two-stage urethral reconstruction with buccal mucosa for hypospadias cripples : Long-term results].

Authors:  S Riechardt; H Isbarn; R Dahlem; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Current and practice-relevant news from pediatric urology].

Authors:  R Stein; A Schröder; M Goepel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Fixation of the glans penis and urethral catheter to the abdominal skin to avoid wound dehiscence after a hypospadias surgery: A comparative study.

Authors:  Ali Atan; Aykut Aykaç; Özer Baran; Melih Sunay
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-02-20

Review 4.  [Management of hypospadias].

Authors:  M Riccabona
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Management of failed hypospadias: choosing the right method and achieving optimal results.

Authors:  Min Wu; Fang Chen; Hua Xie; Yiqing Lv; Yichen Huang; Yidong Liu; Weijing Ye
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Management of urethral fistula after hypospadias repair with particular reference to purse-string sutures: a 24-year review.

Authors:  Stephan Bloesch; Devesh Misra; Amir Tan Mohd-Amin
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 7.  Use of buccal mucosa in hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Omar Cruz-Diaz; Miguel Castellan; Rafael Gosalbez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Failed hypospadias in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Santiago Vallasciani; Gianantonio Manzoni; Waifro Rigamonti; Enrico De Grazia; Marco Castagnetti
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emilie K Johnson; Spencer I Kozinn; Kathryn L Johnson; Sohee Kim; David A Diamond; Alan B Retik
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Single stage ventral onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for navicular fossa strictures.

Authors:  Puskar Shyam Chowdhury; Prasant Nayak; Sujata Mallick; Srinivasan Gurumurthy; Deepak David; A Mossadeq
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.