PURPOSE: To evaluate comprehensively the effect of a radiotherapy boost on breast cosmetic outcomes after 5 years in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: The St. George and Wollongong trial (NCT00138814) randomized 688 patients with histologically proven Tis-2, N 0-1, M0 carcinoma to the control arm of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (342 patients) and theboost arm of 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole breast followed by a 16 Gy in 8 fraction electron boost (346 patients). Five-year cosmetic outcomes were assessed by a panel subjectively in 385 patients and objectively using pBRA (relative breast retraction assessment). A subset of patients also had absolute BRA measurements. Clinician assessment and patient self-assessment of overall cosmetic and specific items as well as computer BCCT.core analysis were also performed. RESULTS: The boost arm had improved cosmetic overall outcomes as scored by the panel and BCCT.core software with 79% (p = 0.016) and 81% (p = 0.004) excellent/good cosmesis respectively compared with 68% in no-boost arm. The boost arm also had lower pBRA and BRA values with a mean difference of 0.60 and 1.82 mm, respectively, but was not statistically significant. There was a very high proportion of overall excellent/good cosmetic outcome in 95% and 93% in the boost and no-boost arms using patient self-assessment. However, no difference in overall and specific items scored by clinician assessment and patient self-assessment was found. CONCLUSION: The results show the negative cosmetic effect of a 16-Gy boost is offset by a lower whole-breast dose of 45 Gy. Crown
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate comprehensively the effect of a radiotherapy boost on breast cosmetic outcomes after 5 years in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: The St. George and Wollongong trial (NCT00138814) randomized 688 patients with histologically proven Tis-2, N 0-1, M0 carcinoma to the control arm of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (342 patients) and the boost arm of 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole breast followed by a 16 Gy in 8 fraction electron boost (346 patients). Five-year cosmetic outcomes were assessed by a panel subjectively in 385 patients and objectively using pBRA (relative breast retraction assessment). A subset of patients also had absolute BRA measurements. Clinician assessment and patient self-assessment of overall cosmetic and specific items as well as computer BCCT.core analysis were also performed. RESULTS: The boost arm had improved cosmetic overall outcomes as scored by the panel and BCCT.core software with 79% (p = 0.016) and 81% (p = 0.004) excellent/good cosmesis respectively compared with 68% in no-boost arm. The boost arm also had lower pBRA and BRA values with a mean difference of 0.60 and 1.82 mm, respectively, but was not statistically significant. There was a very high proportion of overall excellent/good cosmetic outcome in 95% and 93% in the boost and no-boost arms using patient self-assessment. However, no difference in overall and specific items scored by clinician assessment and patient self-assessment was found. CONCLUSION: The results show the negative cosmetic effect of a 16-Gy boost is offset by a lower whole-breast dose of 45 Gy. Crown
Authors: Pierfrancesco Franco; Domenico Cante; Piera Sciacero; Giuseppe Girelli; Maria Rosa La Porta; Umberto Ricardi Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Max Hendrik Haloua; Nicole Marianna Alexandra Krekel; Gerrit Johannes Albertus Jacobs; Barbara Zonderhuis; Mark-Bram Bouman; Marlon Eugène Buncamper; Franciscus Bernardus Niessen; Henri Adolf Hubert Winters; Caroline Terwee; Sybren Meijer; Monique Petrousjka van den Tol Journal: Int J Breast Cancer Date: 2014-09-22
Authors: Max H Haloua; José H Volders; Nicole M A Krekel; Alexander M F Lopes Cardozo; Wifred K de Roos; Louise M de Widt-Levert; Henk van der Veen; Herman Rijna; Elisabeth Bergers; Katarzyna Jóźwiak; Sybren Meijer; Petrousjka van den Tol Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Tammy Corica; Anna K Nowak; Christobel M Saunders; Max K Bulsara; Mandy Taylor; Norman R Williams; Mohammed Keshtgar; David J Joseph; Jayant S Vaidya Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 3.481