Literature DB >> 21255943

Radiotherapy breast boost with reduced whole-breast dose is associated with improved cosmesis: the results of a comprehensive assessment from the St. George and Wollongong randomized breast boost trial.

Eric Hau1, Lois H Browne, Sam Khanna, Stacy Cail, Grad Cert, Yaw Chin, Catherine Clark, Stephanie Inder, Alison Szwajcer, Peter H Graham.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate comprehensively the effect of a radiotherapy boost on breast cosmetic outcomes after 5 years in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
METHODS: The St. George and Wollongong trial (NCT00138814) randomized 688 patients with histologically proven Tis-2, N 0-1, M0 carcinoma to the control arm of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (342 patients) and the boost arm of 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole breast followed by a 16 Gy in 8 fraction electron boost (346 patients). Five-year cosmetic outcomes were assessed by a panel subjectively in 385 patients and objectively using pBRA (relative breast retraction assessment). A subset of patients also had absolute BRA measurements. Clinician assessment and patient self-assessment of overall cosmetic and specific items as well as computer BCCT.core analysis were also performed.
RESULTS: The boost arm had improved cosmetic overall outcomes as scored by the panel and BCCT.core software with 79% (p = 0.016) and 81% (p = 0.004) excellent/good cosmesis respectively compared with 68% in no-boost arm. The boost arm also had lower pBRA and BRA values with a mean difference of 0.60 and 1.82 mm, respectively, but was not statistically significant. There was a very high proportion of overall excellent/good cosmetic outcome in 95% and 93% in the boost and no-boost arms using patient self-assessment. However, no difference in overall and specific items scored by clinician assessment and patient self-assessment was found.
CONCLUSION: The results show the negative cosmetic effect of a 16-Gy boost is offset by a lower whole-breast dose of 45 Gy. Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21255943     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

Review 1.  Tumor Bed Boost Integration during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Review of the Current Evidence.

Authors:  Pierfrancesco Franco; Domenico Cante; Piera Sciacero; Giuseppe Girelli; Maria Rosa La Porta; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The long-term outcome of adjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy and conventional fractionated radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer: a prospective analysis of 107 cases.

Authors:  Shuhong Zhao; Yi Liu; Fengxian Huang; Xin Chen; Ximing Cao; Jiao Yu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Temporary Implant Irradiation: Survey of Turkish Society of Radiation Oncology Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Nuri Kaydıhan; Gül Alço; Mustafa Şükrü Şenocak; Nuran Beşe
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2020-12-24

4.  Cosmetic evaluation methods adapted to asian patients after breast-conserving surgery and examination of the necessarily elements for cosmetic evaluation.

Authors:  Yuki Nohara; Noriko Hanamura; Hisamitsu Zaha; Hiroko Kimura; Yumi Kashikura; Takashi Nakamura; Aya Noro; Nao Imai; Mai Shibusawa; Tomoko Ogawa
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.588

5.  Cosmetic Outcome Assessment following Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Comparison between BCCT.core Software and Panel Evaluation.

Authors:  Max Hendrik Haloua; Nicole Marianna Alexandra Krekel; Gerrit Johannes Albertus Jacobs; Barbara Zonderhuis; Mark-Bram Bouman; Marlon Eugène Buncamper; Franciscus Bernardus Niessen; Henri Adolf Hubert Winters; Caroline Terwee; Sybren Meijer; Monique Petrousjka van den Tol
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-09-22

6.  Objective Measurement of Cosmetic Outcomes of Breast Conserving Therapy Using BCCT.core.

Authors:  Tosol Yu; Keun-Yong Eom; Na Young Jang; Kyung Su Kim; Tae Ryool Koo; Jeanny Kwon; Byoung Hyuck Kim; Eunyoung Kang; Sung-Won Kim; Jae-Sung Kim; In Ah Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.679

7.  Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance in Breast-Conserving Surgery Improves Cosmetic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (COBALT).

Authors:  Max H Haloua; José H Volders; Nicole M A Krekel; Alexander M F Lopes Cardozo; Wifred K de Roos; Louise M de Widt-Levert; Henk van der Veen; Herman Rijna; Elisabeth Bergers; Katarzyna Jóźwiak; Sybren Meijer; Petrousjka van den Tol
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and BCCT.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the TARGIT-A Trial.

Authors:  Tammy Corica; Anna K Nowak; Christobel M Saunders; Max K Bulsara; Mandy Taylor; Norman R Williams; Mohammed Keshtgar; David J Joseph; Jayant S Vaidya
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Adaptive radiation therapy of breast cancer by repeated imaging during irradiation.

Authors:  Omer Sager; Ferrat Dincoglan; Selcuk Demiral; Bora Uysal; Hakan Gamsiz; Fatih Ozcan; Onurhan Colak; Yelda Elcim; Esin Gundem; Bahar Dirican; Murat Beyzadeoglu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2020-05-28

10.  Loco-regional outcomes of adjusted breast radiotherapy with conventional fractionation after breast conserving surgery: De-escalation of whole breast irradiation dose.

Authors:  Sang-Won Kim; Mison Chun; Young-Taek Oh; O Kyu Noh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.