Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Systematic literature review of reoperations after gastric banding: is a stepwise approach justified?

Literature DB >> 21255736

Systematic literature review of reoperations after gastric banding: is a stepwise approach justified?

Ruben Schouten¹, Dennis Japink, Berry Meesters, Patty J Nelemans, Jan Willem M Greve.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2010 PMID： 21255736 DOI： 10.1016/j.soard.2010.10.010

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis ISSN： 1550-7289 Impact factor: 4.734

Keyword Cloud
Cited

× No keyword cloud information.

13 in total

1. Conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is safe as a single-step procedure.

Authors: M Emous; J Apers; C Hoff; A P van Beek; E Totté
Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 4.584

2. Revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors: N A Jennings; M Boyle; K Mahawar; S Balupuri; P K Small
Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.129

3. Two stages conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass. A study of one hundred patients.

Authors: Sergio Carandina; Malek Tabbara; Manuela Bossi; Nada Helmy; Claude Polliand; Christophe Barrat
Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.452

4. Revision of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: success or failure?

Authors: G H E J Vijgen; R Schouten; L Pelzers; J W Greve; S H van Helden; N D Bouvy
Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.129

5. Rebanding for slippage after gastric banding: should we do it?

Authors: Wouter W te Riele; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Djamila Boerma; Henderik L van Westreenen; Marinus J Wiezer; Bert van Ramshorst
Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.129

6. Laparoscopic gastric banding outcomes do not depend on device or technique. long-term results of a prospective randomized study comparing the Lapband® and the SAGB®.

Authors: Daniel Gero; Anna Dayer-Jankechova; Marc Worreth; Vittorio Giusti; Michel Suter
Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 4.129

Systematic literature review of reoperations after gastric banding: is a stepwise approach justified?

1. Conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is safe as a single-step procedure.

2. Revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

3. Two stages conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass. A study of one hundred patients.

4. Revision of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: success or failure?

5. Rebanding for slippage after gastric banding: should we do it?

6. Laparoscopic gastric banding outcomes do not depend on device or technique. long-term results of a prospective randomized study comparing the Lapband® and the SAGB®.

7. Redo Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: One-Step or Two-Step Procedure?

8. Laparoscopic removal of poor outcome gastric banding with concomitant sleeve gastrectomy.

9. Comparison of Preoperative Diets Before Bariatric Surgery: a Randomized, Single-Blinded, Non-inferiority Trial.

10. A comparison between one- and two-stage revisional gastric bypass.