Literature DB >> 21253982

Identification and measurement of diacetyl substitutes in dry bakery mix production.

Gregory Day1, Ryan LeBouf, Ardith Grote, Stephanie Pendergrass, Kristin Cummings, Kathleen Kreiss, Greg Kullman.   

Abstract

In 2008, a company using multiple buttermilk flavorings in the production of dry bakery mixes replaced one liquid flavoring containing 15-20% diacetyl with a proprietary substitute meant to lower occupational risk for diacetyl-related bronchiolitis obliterans. Subsequently, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) evaluated buttermilk flavoring-related exposures at this company's facility, with a focus on measuring ketones by several methods. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were evaluated in the headspaces of six bulk flavorings samples, including the substitute buttermilk flavoring. Ketones were evaluated in workplace air via area and personal samples collected during batch preparation of the substitute buttermilk flavoring and production of a bakery mix containing the same flavoring. Air samples were evaluated using five different methods: NIOSH 2549, Modified OSHA PV2118, OSHA 1013, NIOSH Draft Procedure SMP2, and evacuated canisters. Of five buttermilk flavorings from five different flavorings manufacturers, diacetyl was present in four, including the substitute flavoring; acetoin in two; 2,3-pentanedione in four; 2,3-hexanedione in one; and 2,3-heptanedione in three. Among material safety data sheets (MSDS) for four flavorings, only one listed a hazardous ingredient, which was acetoin. The predominant flavoring ingredient identified in the headspace of the substitute flavoring was 2,3-pentanedione; all other chemicals noted above were also present. Diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione were measured in workplace air via evacuated canisters. In one area and one personal air sample, 2,3-pentanedione was measured by OSHA Method 1013 at concentrations of 78 and 91 ppb, respectively. Without their or the employer's knowledge, workers who used buttermilk flavorings were exposed to substitute ketones from many flavorings manufacturers. Because 2,3-pentanedione, 2,3-hexanedione, and 2,3-heptanedione all share the same functional α-diketone group as diacetyl, these compounds also may share diacetyl's mechanism of toxicity. Until more is known about 2,3-pentanedione and other α-diketone compounds, they should not be assumed to be safe. Companies using artificial buttermilk flavorings should use a precautionary approach that assumes these flavorings pose a health risk and limit exposures through engineering and administrative controls and use of personal protective equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21253982     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2011.547148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  18 in total

1.  NIOSH's Respiratory Health Division: 50 years of science and service.

Authors:  Kristin J Cummings; Doug O Johns; Jacek M Mazurek; Frank J Hearl; David N Weissman
Journal:  Arch Environ Occup Health       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 1.663

2.  Potential Hazards Not Communicated in Safety Data Sheets of Flavoring Formulations, Including Diacetyl and 2,3-Pentanedione.

Authors:  Ryan F LeBouf; Brie Hawley; Kristin J Cummings
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.179

3.  Environmental characterization of a coffee processing workplace with obliterative bronchiolitis in former workers.

Authors:  Matthew G Duling; Ryan F LeBouf; Jean M Cox-Ganser; Kathleen Kreiss; Stephen B Martin; Rachel L Bailey
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Recognizing occupational effects of diacetyl: What can we learn from this history?

Authors:  Kathleen Kreiss
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Evaluation of electronic cigarette liquids and aerosol for the presence of selected inhalation toxins.

Authors:  Konstantinos E Farsalinos; Kurt A Kistler; Gene Gillman; Vassilis Voudris
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Evaluation of the hypersensitivity potential of alternative butter flavorings.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Jennifer Franko; J R Wells; Ewa Lukomska; B Jean Meade
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 6.023

7.  Respiratory and olfactory cytotoxicity of inhaled 2,3-pentanedione in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Ann F Hubbs; Amy M Cumpston; W Travis Goldsmith; Lori A Battelli; Michael L Kashon; Mark C Jackson; David G Frazer; Jeffrey S Fedan; Madhusudan P Goravanahally; Vincent Castranova; Kathleen Kreiss; Patsy A Willard; Sherri Friend; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Kara L Fluharty; Krishnan Sriram
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Flavoring exposure in food manufacturing.

Authors:  Brian D Curwin; Jim A Deddens; Lauralynn T McKernan
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 9.  Occupational causes of constrictive bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Kathleen Kreiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-04

10.  Chemical Reactivity and Respiratory Toxicity of the α-Diketone Flavoring Agents: 2,3-Butanedione, 2,3-Pentanedione, and 2,3-Hexanedione.

Authors:  Daniel L Morgan; Micheal P Jokinen; Crystal L Johnson; Herman C Price; William M Gwinn; Ronald W Bousquet; Gordon P Flake
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 1.902

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.