Literature DB >> 21253962

The TCN/AACN 2010 "salary survey": professional practices, beliefs, and incomes of U.S. neuropsychologists.

Jerry J Sweet1, Dawn Giuffre Meyer, Nathaniel W Nelson, Paul J Moberg.   

Abstract

Doctoral-level members of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology, Division 40 (Clinical Neuropsychology) of the American Psychological Association, and the National Academy of Neuropsychology, and other neuropsychologists, were invited to participate in a web-based survey in early 2010. The sample of respondents was 56% larger than a prior related income and practice survey in 2005. The substantial proportional change in gender taking place in the field has continued, with 7 of 10 post-doctoral residents being women and, for the first time ever, more than half of the total sample of respondents being women. Whereas the median age of APA members has been over 50 since the early 1990s, the current median age of clinical neuropsychologists remains at 47 and has remained essentially unchanged since 1989, indicating substantial entrance of young psychologists into the field. The Houston Conference training model has influenced the vast majority of residency training sites, and is endorsed as compatible with prior training by two-thirds of all respondents. Testing assistant usage remains commonplace, and is much more common in institutions. The "flexible battery" approach has again increased in popularity and predominates, whereas endorsement of the "fixed/standardized battery" approach has continued to decline. The vast majority of clinical neuropsychologists work full time. Average length of time reported for evaluations increased significantly from 2005, which does not appear to be explained by changes in common referral sources or common diagnostic conditions being evaluated. The most common factors affecting evaluation length were identified, with the top three being goal of evaluation, stamina/health of examinee, and age of examinee. Pediatric specialists are more likely than others to work part time, more likely to be women, more likely to work in institutions, and report lower incomes than respondents whose professional identity is purely adult or a combination of adult and pediatric. Incomes once again vary considerably by years of clinical practice, work setting, amount of forensic practice, state, and region of country. Job satisfaction has little relationship to income and is comparable across most variables (e.g., work setting, professional identity, amount of forensic activity), whereas income satisfaction has a stronger relationship to actual income, and income satisfaction and job satisfaction are moderately correlated. Job satisfaction of neuropsychologists in general is higher than reported for other US jobs. Fewer than 5% of respondents are considering changing job position. As was true in the 2005 survey, a substantial majority of respondents reported increased incomes over the last 5 years. Actual reported income values were meaningfully higher than in 2005 across general work settings and professional identities, and were also higher for entry-level positions. Numerous breakdowns related to income and professional activities are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21253962     DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2010.544165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1385-4046            Impact factor:   3.535


  4 in total

1.  Twenty years of the Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings: we hope you will enjoy the show.

Authors:  Ronald H Rozensky; Steven M Tovian; Jerry J Sweet
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2014-03

Review 2.  Test validity and performance validity: considerations in providing a framework for development of an ability-focused neuropsychological test battery.

Authors:  Glenn J Larrabee
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Neuroimaging training among neuropsychologists: a survey of the state of current training and recommendations for trainees.

Authors:  Andreana Benitez; Jason Hassenstab; Katherine J Bangen
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 4.  Effort, symptom validity testing, performance validity testing and traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Erin D Bigler
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.311

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.