INTRODUCTION: Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase domain such as EGFR-L858R and EGFR-G719S have been reported to activate the kinase and also sensitize a subset of patients with non-small cell lung cancer to EGFR kinase inhibitor treatment. Nevertheless, for other common point mutations such as EGFR-L861Q, it is unclear whether and to what extent they sensitize toward gefitinib and erlotinib. Thus far, there is no reliable cellular assay to compare in a ligand-independent manner intrinsic kinase activity and drug sensitivity of the unmutated (wild type) and mutated EGFR kinase domain. METHODS: To overcome this obstacle, we introduced L858R, G719S, and L861Q into the backbone of EGFRvIII. EGFRvIII has a wild type-kinase domain but is activated in a ligand-independent manner through a deletion in the extracellular domain. RESULTS: Using this tool, we show that the L861Q mutation displays enhanced kinase activity and transforming potential compared with L858R, G719S, and also to the wild type-EGFR kinase domain. Interestingly, L861Q does not increase drug sensitivity toward clinically used EGFR kinase inhibitors in contrast to the L858R and G719S mutation. In addition, we demonstrate that EGFR-L861Q could be effectively inhibited with the irreversible second-generation EGFR inhibitor WZ-4002. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, in the common EGFR-L861Q mutation, activation of the kinase domain is uncoupled from a sensitizing effect toward clinically approved kinase inhibitors. Therefore, patients with EGFR-L861Q may not have the same clinical benefit from gefitinib/erlotinib treatment as patients with EGFR-L858R and EGFR-G719S mutations. Treatment with irreversible second-generation kinase inhibitors such as WZ-4002 may be an attractive option in the future for patients with EGFR-L861Q.
INTRODUCTION: Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase domain such as EGFR-L858R and EGFR-G719S have been reported to activate the kinase and also sensitize a subset of patients with non-small cell lung cancer to EGFR kinase inhibitor treatment. Nevertheless, for other common point mutations such as EGFR-L861Q, it is unclear whether and to what extent they sensitize toward gefitinib and erlotinib. Thus far, there is no reliable cellular assay to compare in a ligand-independent manner intrinsic kinase activity and drug sensitivity of the unmutated (wild type) and mutated EGFR kinase domain. METHODS: To overcome this obstacle, we introduced L858R, G719S, and L861Q into the backbone of EGFRvIII. EGFRvIII has a wild type-kinase domain but is activated in a ligand-independent manner through a deletion in the extracellular domain. RESULTS: Using this tool, we show that the L861Q mutation displays enhanced kinase activity and transforming potential compared with L858R, G719S, and also to the wild type-EGFR kinase domain. Interestingly, L861Q does not increase drug sensitivity toward clinically used EGFR kinase inhibitors in contrast to the L858R and G719S mutation. In addition, we demonstrate that EGFR-L861Q could be effectively inhibited with the irreversible second-generation EGFR inhibitor WZ-4002. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, in the common EGFR-L861Q mutation, activation of the kinase domain is uncoupled from a sensitizing effect toward clinically approved kinase inhibitors. Therefore, patients with EGFR-L861Q may not have the same clinical benefit from gefitinib/erlotinib treatment as patients with EGFR-L858R and EGFR-G719S mutations. Treatment with irreversible second-generation kinase inhibitors such as WZ-4002 may be an attractive option in the future for patients with EGFR-L861Q.
Authors: Angela Hamblin; Sarah Wordsworth; Jilles M Fermont; Suzanne Page; Kulvinder Kaur; Carme Camps; Pamela Kaisaki; Avinash Gupta; Denis Talbot; Mark Middleton; Shirley Henderson; Anthony Cutts; Dimitrios V Vavoulis; Nick Housby; Ian Tomlinson; Jenny C Taylor; Anna Schuh Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: M Beau-Faller; N Prim; A-M Ruppert; I Nanni-Metéllus; R Lacave; L Lacroix; F Escande; S Lizard; J-L Pretet; I Rouquette; P de Crémoux; J Solassol; F de Fraipont; I Bièche; A Cayre; E Favre-Guillevin; P Tomasini; M Wislez; B Besse; M Legrain; A-C Voegeli; L Baudrin; F Morin; G Zalcman; E Quoix; H Blons; J Cadranel Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Rama Krishna Kancha; Nikolas von Bubnoff; Natalie Bartosch; Christian Peschel; Richard A Engh; Justus Duyster Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 3.240