Literature DB >> 21252719

The epidermal growth factor receptor-L861Q mutation increases kinase activity without leading to enhanced sensitivity toward epidermal growth factor receptor kinase inhibitors.

Rama Krishna Kancha1, Christian Peschel, Justus Duyster.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase domain such as EGFR-L858R and EGFR-G719S have been reported to activate the kinase and also sensitize a subset of patients with non-small cell lung cancer to EGFR kinase inhibitor treatment. Nevertheless, for other common point mutations such as EGFR-L861Q, it is unclear whether and to what extent they sensitize toward gefitinib and erlotinib. Thus far, there is no reliable cellular assay to compare in a ligand-independent manner intrinsic kinase activity and drug sensitivity of the unmutated (wild type) and mutated EGFR kinase domain.
METHODS: To overcome this obstacle, we introduced L858R, G719S, and L861Q into the backbone of EGFRvIII. EGFRvIII has a wild type-kinase domain but is activated in a ligand-independent manner through a deletion in the extracellular domain.
RESULTS: Using this tool, we show that the L861Q mutation displays enhanced kinase activity and transforming potential compared with L858R, G719S, and also to the wild type-EGFR kinase domain. Interestingly, L861Q does not increase drug sensitivity toward clinically used EGFR kinase inhibitors in contrast to the L858R and G719S mutation. In addition, we demonstrate that EGFR-L861Q could be effectively inhibited with the irreversible second-generation EGFR inhibitor WZ-4002.
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, in the common EGFR-L861Q mutation, activation of the kinase domain is uncoupled from a sensitizing effect toward clinically approved kinase inhibitors. Therefore, patients with EGFR-L861Q may not have the same clinical benefit from gefitinib/erlotinib treatment as patients with EGFR-L858R and EGFR-G719S mutations. Treatment with irreversible second-generation kinase inhibitors such as WZ-4002 may be an attractive option in the future for patients with EGFR-L861Q.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21252719     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182021f3e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  22 in total

Review 1.  Tumour molecular profiling for deciding therapy-the French initiative.

Authors:  Frédérique Nowak; Jean-Charles Soria; Fabien Calvo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Clinical applicability and cost of a 46-gene panel for genomic analysis of solid tumours: Retrospective validation and prospective audit in the UK National Health Service.

Authors:  Angela Hamblin; Sarah Wordsworth; Jilles M Fermont; Suzanne Page; Kulvinder Kaur; Carme Camps; Pamela Kaisaki; Avinash Gupta; Denis Talbot; Mark Middleton; Shirley Henderson; Anthony Cutts; Dimitrios V Vavoulis; Nick Housby; Ian Tomlinson; Jenny C Taylor; Anna Schuh
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Mechanistic Insights into R776H Mediated Activation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase.

Authors:  Zheng Ruan; Natarajan Kannan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Neoadjuvant erlotinib and surgical resection of a stage iiia papillary adenocarcinoma of the lung with an L861Q activating EGFR mutation.

Authors:  M Ong; K Kwan; S Kamel-Reid; M Vincent
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Mutation landscape and tumor mutation burden analysis of Chinese patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas.

Authors:  Xiaohong Liang; Qing Li; Bin Xu; Song Hu; Qianyun Wang; Yan Li; Yun Zong; Sujuan Zhang; Chong Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Rare EGFR exon 18 and exon 20 mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer on 10 117 patients: a multicentre observational study by the French ERMETIC-IFCT network.

Authors:  M Beau-Faller; N Prim; A-M Ruppert; I Nanni-Metéllus; R Lacave; L Lacroix; F Escande; S Lizard; J-L Pretet; I Rouquette; P de Crémoux; J Solassol; F de Fraipont; I Bièche; A Cayre; E Favre-Guillevin; P Tomasini; M Wislez; B Besse; M Legrain; A-C Voegeli; L Baudrin; F Morin; G Zalcman; E Quoix; H Blons; J Cadranel
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Differential sensitivity of ERBB2 kinase domain mutations towards lapatinib.

Authors:  Rama Krishna Kancha; Nikolas von Bubnoff; Natalie Bartosch; Christian Peschel; Richard A Engh; Justus Duyster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Gene amplification of EGFR, HER2, FGFR2 and MET in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kato; Tokuzo Arao; Kazuko Matsumoto; Yoshihiko Fujita; Hideharu Kimura; Hidetoshi Hayashi; Kouhei Nishiki; Mitsuru Iwama; Osamu Shiraishi; Atsushi Yasuda; Masayuki Shinkai; Motohiro Imano; Haruhiko Imamoto; Takushi Yasuda; Kiyotaka Okuno; Hitoshi Shiozaki; Kazuto Nishio
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 5.650

9.  Comparison of molecular testing methods for the detection of EGFR mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Fernando Lopez-Rios; Barbara Angulo; Belen Gomez; Debbie Mair; Rebeca Martinez; Esther Conde; Felice Shieh; Julie Tsai; Jeffrey Vaks; Robert Current; H Jeffrey Lawrence; David Gonzalez de Castro
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.