Literature DB >> 21252307

Content comparison of self-report measures used in vestibular rehabilitation based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health.

Alia A Alghwiri1, Gregory F Marchetti, Susan L Whitney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical therapists should understand the content included in self-report questionnaires in order to choose the appropriate questionnaire for examination and follow-up purposes. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a universal and standard language for the description of health and health-related states and can be used for the content comparison of self-report questionnaires. Objective The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the contents covered by 8 self-report measures used in vestibular rehabilitation based on the linkage of their content to the ICF.
DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study.
METHOD: Eight vestibular questionnaires were identified and linked to the ICF by 2 health care professionals according to established linking rules. Based on the linking, the contents of the 8 questionnaires were compared and the interobserver agreement between 2 raters was estimated using kappa coefficients.
RESULTS: A total of 312 meaningful concepts from the 164 items of the 8 vestibular questionnaires were identified and linked to the ICF. The meaningful concepts identified were linked to 51 different ICF components: 19 categories of the component "body functions," 30 categories of the component "activities and participation," and 2 categories of the component "environmental factors." Forty-two concepts could not be linked to any of the ICF components. The estimated kappa coefficients for 2 raters at the component and first and second levels of the ICF ranged from 0.83 to 0.96. Limitations The method of identifying vestibular measures was not based on a systematic search; instead, the most widely used instruments in the field of vestibular rehabilitation were selected. Thus, the study results are limited to the examined vestibular instruments.
CONCLUSION: Using the ICF as a theoretical framework was found to be useful for comparing the content of health status questionnaires, as well as for exploring the focus of the measures currently in use in vestibular rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21252307     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20100255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  11 in total

1.  Factors associated with balance confidence in older adults with health conditions affecting the balance and vestibular system.

Authors:  Gregory F Marchetti; Susan L Whitney; Mark S Redfern; Joseph M Furman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Reliability and validity of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) in individuals with dizziness and imbalance.

Authors:  Michael T Morgan; Lauren A Friscia; Susan L Whitney; Joseph M Furman; Patrick J Sparto
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 3.  Principles of vestibular physical therapy rehabilitation.

Authors:  Susan L Whitney; Patrick J Sparto
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.138

Review 4.  The impact of dizziness on quality-of-life in the elderly.

Authors:  Andrea Ciorba; Chiara Bianchini; Giovanni Scanelli; Marco Pala; Amedeo Zurlo; Claudia Aimoni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Responsiveness of self-report measures in individuals with vertigo, dizziness, and unsteadiness.

Authors:  Lauren A Friscia; Michael T Morgan; Patrick J Sparto; Joseph M Furman; Susan L Whitney
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Quality of Life Rating for Dizziness: A Self-reporting Questionnaire.

Authors:  Rajesh Ranjan; Jayashree Bhat; Priyanka E M Vas Naik
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-02-02

7.  Benefits of vestibular rehabilitation on patient-reported outcomes in older adults with vestibular disorders: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mayra Cristina Aratani; Natalia Aquaroni Ricci; Heloísa Helena Caovilla; Fernando Freitas Ganança
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the vestibular activities and participation measure.

Authors:  Peixia Wu; Mei Yang; Yan Hu; Huawei Li
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.354

9.  Evaluation of properties of the Vestibular Disorders Activities of Daily Living Scale (Brazilian version) in an elderly population.

Authors:  Natalia A Ricci; Mayra C Aratani; Heloisa H Caovilla; Helen S Cohen; Fernando F Ganança
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 10.  Health care utilization, prognosis and outcomes of vestibular disease in primary care settings: systematic review.

Authors:  Eva Grill; Mathias Penger; Erna Kentala
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.