CONTEXT: In rodents, high-fat diets increase intrahepatic lipid (IHL), but human studies are scarce. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine whether high-fat diets influence IHL, intramyocellular lipids (IMCL), and insulin resistance. DESIGN:Twenty overweight men were randomly allocated to low- or high-fat groups (age, 54.0 ± 2.3 and 56.4 ± 2.5 yr; body mass index, 29.3 ± 0.6 and 28.3 ± 0.5 kg/m(2), respectively). Both groups started with a 3-wk low-fat diet [15% energy (En%) as protein, 65 En% as carbohydrates, 20 En% as fat], after which half of the subjects switched to a 3-wk isocaloric high-fat diet (15 En% protein, 30 En% carbohydrates, 55 En% fat). After 3 and 6 wk, IHL and IMCL content were assessed by (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy and a muscle biopsy, and insulin sensitivity was studied using a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. An additional liver scan was performed after 1 wk in the high-fat group. RESULTS:IHL decreased by 13% in the low-fat group and increased by 17% in high-fat group (P = 0.047). IMCL content was unaffected (P = 0.304). Insulin sensitivity was unaffected. At wk 3, IHL correlated negatively with insulin sensitivity (r = -0.584; P = 0.009, all subjects combined). Metabolic flexibility, defined as change in respiratory quotient upon insulin stimulation, was decreased after 3 wk of the high-fat diet (change in respiratory quotient was +0.02 ± 0.02 vs. -0.05 ± 0.1 in low-fat vs. high-fat group, P = 0.009). Basal plasma glucose increased after the high-fat diet (P = 0.038). Plasma parameters insulin, free fatty acids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and liver enzymes and body weight were unaffected by diet. CONCLUSION: A 3-wk high-fat diet leads to IHL accumulation and a decreased metabolic flexibility, but insulin sensitivity is unaffected.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: In rodents, high-fat diets increase intrahepatic lipid (IHL), but human studies are scarce. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine whether high-fat diets influence IHL, intramyocellular lipids (IMCL), and insulin resistance. DESIGN: Twenty overweight men were randomly allocated to low- or high-fat groups (age, 54.0 ± 2.3 and 56.4 ± 2.5 yr; body mass index, 29.3 ± 0.6 and 28.3 ± 0.5 kg/m(2), respectively). Both groups started with a 3-wk low-fat diet [15% energy (En%) as protein, 65 En% as carbohydrates, 20 En% as fat], after which half of the subjects switched to a 3-wk isocaloric high-fat diet (15 En% protein, 30 En% carbohydrates, 55 En% fat). After 3 and 6 wk, IHL and IMCL content were assessed by (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy and a muscle biopsy, and insulin sensitivity was studied using a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. An additional liver scan was performed after 1 wk in the high-fat group. RESULTS: IHL decreased by 13% in the low-fat group and increased by 17% in high-fat group (P = 0.047). IMCL content was unaffected (P = 0.304). Insulin sensitivity was unaffected. At wk 3, IHL correlated negatively with insulin sensitivity (r = -0.584; P = 0.009, all subjects combined). Metabolic flexibility, defined as change in respiratory quotient upon insulin stimulation, was decreased after 3 wk of the high-fat diet (change in respiratory quotient was +0.02 ± 0.02 vs. -0.05 ± 0.1 in low-fat vs. high-fat group, P = 0.009). Basal plasma glucose increased after the high-fat diet (P = 0.038). Plasma parameters insulin, free fatty acids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and liver enzymes and body weight were unaffected by diet. CONCLUSION: A 3-wk high-fat diet leads to IHL accumulation and a decreased metabolic flexibility, but insulin sensitivity is unaffected.
Authors: G Misciagna; M Del Pilar Díaz; D V Caramia; C Bonfiglio; I Franco; M R Noviello; M Chiloiro; D I Abbrescia; A Mirizzi; M Tanzi; M G Caruso; M Correale; R Reddavide; R Inguaggiato; A M Cisternino; A R Osella Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Esther Winters-van Eekelen; Inge Verkouter; Harry P F Peters; Marjan Alssema; Babette G de Roos; Vera B Schrauwen-Hinderling; Kay H M Roumans; Jan W Schoones; Peter L Zock; Patrick Schrauwen; Frits R Rosendaal; Olaf M Dekkers; Renée de Mutsert Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-10-22 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Lidiane B Muniz; Aline M Alves-Santos; Fabricio Camargo; Danieli Brolo Martins; Mara Rubia N Celes; Maria Margareth V Naves Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Shane M Regnier; Andrew G Kirkley; Honggang Ye; Essam El-Hashani; Xiaojie Zhang; Brian A Neel; Wakanene Kamau; Celeste C Thomas; Ayanna K Williams; Emily T Hayes; Nicole L Massad; Daniel N Johnson; Lei Huang; Chunling Zhang; Robert M Sargis Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: E Matthew Morris; Matthew R Jackman; Grace M E Meers; Ginger C Johnson; Jordan L Lopez; Paul S MacLean; John P Thyfault Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Kristina M Utzschneider; Jennifer L Bayer-Carter; Matthew D Arbuckle; Jaime M Tidwell; Todd L Richards; Suzanne Craft Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Anize D von Frankenberg; Anna Marina; Xiaoling Song; Holly S Callahan; Mario Kratz; Kristina M Utzschneider Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2015-11-28 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: David H McDougal; Kara L Marlatt; Robbie A Beyl; Leanne M Redman; Eric Ravussin Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2020-09-27 Impact factor: 5.002