Literature DB >> 21251860

Multi-centre European study of breakthrough cancer pain: pain characteristics and patient perceptions of current and potential management strategies.

Andrew Davies1, Giovambattista Zeppetella, Steen Andersen, Anette Damkier, Tove Vejlgaard, Friedemann Nauck, Lukas Radbruch, Karl-Frederik Sjolund, Mariann Stenberg, Alison Buchanan.   

Abstract

This study involved 320 cancer patients from four Northern European countries. Patients with breakthrough pain were questioned about the characteristics of their pain, the current management of their pain, and the acceptability/utility of alternative routes of administration. The median number of episodes was 3/day. Forty-four percent patients reported incident-type pain, 39% spontaneous-type pain, and 17% a combination of these pains. The median duration was 60 min, and the median time to peak intensity was 15 min. Three percent patients reported "mild" pain, 37% "moderate" pain, and 60% "severe" pain. Ninety percent patients stated that the pain interfered with their daily activities. All patients were using opioids as rescue medication (mainly oral morphine/oxycodone), whilst 28% patients were using non-opioids, and 50% patients were using non-pharmacological interventions. Only 55% patients took rescue medication every time they experienced breakthrough pain. Sixty-five percent patients would definitely consider using an oral transmucosal product; patients from Denmark were less likely to answer positively, and a positive response was associated with previous use of the route for breakthrough pain. Seventy-three percent patients reported regular oral problems. Forty-two percent patients would definitely consider using an intranasal product, with 26% patients stating they would definitely not use such a preparation; patients from Denmark and Sweden were less likely to answer positively, and a positive response was associated with male gender, and previous use of the route. Forty-four percent patients reported regular nasal problems. Sixty percent patients would definitely consider using a subcutaneous product, and 44% patients would definitely consider using an intrapulmonary product.
Copyright © 2010 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21251860     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  36 in total

Review 1.  Breakthrough cancer pain.

Authors:  Andrew N Davies
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-06

Review 2.  Breakthrough pain and its treatment: critical review and recommendations of IOPS (Italian Oncologic Pain Survey) expert group.

Authors:  Sebastiano Mercadante; Paolo Marchetti; Arturo Cuomo; Massimo Mammucari; Augusto Caraceni
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Characterizing episodic breathlessness in patients with advanced disease.

Authors:  Vera Weingärtner; Claudia Bausewein; Irene J Higginson; Christine Scheve; Fliss E M Murtagh; Raymond Voltz; Steffen T Simon
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Oncologist's knowledge and implementation of guidelines for breakthrough cancer pain in Spain: CONOCE study.

Authors:  R López López; C Camps Herrero; P Khosravi-Shahi; V Guillem Porta; A Carrato Mena; J Garcia-Foncillas; J J Cruz Hernández; P Gascón Vilaplana; A Antón Torres; E Diaz-Rubio; M Feyjoo Saus; E Aranda Aguilar
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Is it possible to detect an improvement in cancer pain management? A comparison of two Norwegian cross-sectional studies conducted 5 years apart.

Authors:  Morten Thronæs; Sunil X Raj; Cinzia Brunelli; Sigrun Saur Almberg; Ola Magne Vagnildhaug; Susanna Bruheim; Birgit Helgheim; Stein Kaasa; Anne Kari Knudsen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Multidimensional Treatment of Cancer Pain.

Authors:  Weiyang Christopher Liu; Zhong Xi Zheng; Kian Hian Tan; Gregory J Meredith
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Acceptability and preferences of six different routes of drug application for acute breathlessness: a comparison study between the United Kingdom and Germany.

Authors:  Steffen T Simon; Anna Maria Niemand; Hamid Benalia; Raymond Voltz; Irene J Higginson; Claudia Bausewein
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 8.  Breakthrough pain in elderly patients with cancer: treatment options.

Authors:  Sophie Pautex; Nicole Vogt-Ferrier; Gilbert B Zulian
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Canadian recommendations for the management of breakthrough cancer pain.

Authors:  P Daeninck; B Gagnon; R Gallagher; J D Henderson; Y Shir; C Zimmermann; B Lapointe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  A cross-sectional study on prevalence of pain and breakthrough pain among an unselected group of outpatients in a tertiary cancer clinic.

Authors:  Sunil X Raj; Morten Thronaes; Cinzia Brunelli; Marianne J Hjermstad; Pål Klepstad; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.