Literature DB >> 21251784

The negative predictive value of breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in noncalcified BIRADS 3 lesions.

M D Dorrius1, R M Pijnappel, P E Sijens, M C Jansen van der Weide, M Oudkerk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether breast MRI can provide a sufficient NPV to safely rule out malignancy in mammographic BIRADS 3 lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 3-year consecutive mammographic examination study 176 out of 4391 patients had a lesion classified as BIRADS 3. 76 out of 176 patients underwent breast MRI as diagnostic work-up. Lesions which MRI classified as BIRADS 1 or 2 were considered negative for malignancy. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated.
RESULTS: In 27 out of 76 (35.5%) patients MRI showed no enhancement and was classified as BIRADS 1. In 25 (32.9%) patients MRI showed focal or mass enhancement classified as BIRADS 2. In these 52 (68.4%) patients no malignancy was found during at least 2 years study follow-up. The other 24 (31.6%) patients had a lesion classified as BIRADS ≥ 3. Thirteen of these 24 lesions were malignant by pathology. MRI had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 75-100%), specificity of 82.5% (95% CI: 71-91%), PPV of 54.2% (95% CI: 33-74%) and NPV of 100% (95% CI: 93-100%).
CONCLUSION: Breast MRI should be used in a diagnostic strategy for the work-up of noncalcified BIRADS 3 lesions. Malignancy is ruled out with a very high level of confidence in the majority of patients (68%), herewith avoiding invasive diagnostic procedures.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21251784     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  7 in total

1.  Additional diagnostic value of MRI in patients with suspicious breast lesions based on ultrasound.

Authors:  O Sarica; F Uluc
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Breast cancer: a new imaging approach as an addition to existing guidelines.

Authors:  Monique D Dorrius; Erik F J de Vries; Riemer H J A Slart; Andor W J M Glaudemans
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in probably benign (BI-RADS category 3) microcalcifications of the breast.

Authors:  Anna Linda; Chiara Zuiani; Viviana Londero; Eleonora Di Gaetano; Anna Dal Col; Rossano Girometti; Massimo Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Bennani-Baiti; Nabila Bennani-Baiti; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Simplifying Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification of mammograms with pure suspicious calcifications.

Authors:  Gisela Lg Menezes; Gonneke Ao Winter-Warnars; Eva L Koekenbier; Emma J Groen; Helena M Verkooijen; Ruud M Pijnappel
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making.

Authors:  M Wielema; P E Sijens; H Dijkstra; G H De Bock; I G van Bruggen; J E Siegersma; E Langius; R M Pijnappel; M D Dorrius; M Oudkerk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reader characteristics and mammogram features associated with breast imaging reporting scores.

Authors:  Phuong Dung Yun Trieu; Sarah J Lewis; Tong Li; Karen Ho; Kriscia A Tapia; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.039

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.