Literature DB >> 21251703

Comparison of three diagnostic methods to identify subclinical endometritis in mares.

W Overbeck1, T S Witte, W Heuwieser.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of a uterine swab (US), a cytological brush (CB) and an endometrial biopsy (EB) to detect subclinical endometritis in mares. Cytological and bacteriological results of all three techniques were related to histological occurrence of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) in the stratum compactum, commonly known as 'best standard'; to diagnose endometritis. Samples were taken from 55 mares of different breeds without clinical signs of endometritis. Samples for US, CB and EB were collected, smeared on a microscopic slide and cultured for bacterial growth. Endometrial biopsy samples were additionally stored in 4% formaldehyde for histological analysis. Bacteriological cultures and cytological samples of all techniques were classified as negative (no uterine pathogens in monoculture; < 2% PMNs) or positive (uterine pathogens in > 90% of the grown colonies; > 2% PMNs) for endometritis. Uterine pathogens were diagnosed in 20.0% of the mares. Isolation of pathogens was not associated with positive cytological findings (r = -0.23; P = 0.87). None of the six mares with an Escherichia coli infection (10.9%) showed a positive cytological result. In contrast, two of five mares infected with Streptococcus zooepidemicus had a positive cytological result. Histologically, the presence of PMNs in the stratum compactum was regarded as positive for endometritis when the mare was in diestrus at time of sampling. Compared to the 'best standard', sensitivity for cytology of CB, US and EB was 0.17, 0.00 and 0.25, respectively. Specificity for cytology of CB, US and EB was 0.83, 0.93 and 0.85, respectively. Sensitivity of uterine culture was 0.25, 0.33 and 0.25 for CB, US and EB, respectively. Specificity for culture of CB, US and EB was 0.80, 0.83 and 0.95, respectively. In conclusion, cytological or bacteriological examinations alone provide a high incidence of false negative results. Sensitivity of cytology combined with bacteriology of CB was 0.42. A combination of a bacteriological and a cytological examination of a CB sample improved the diagnostic performance in subfertile mares. Based on these results, we can recommend the CB to improve the diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in the mare compared to the US alone as currently used routine method.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21251703     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  11 in total

Review 1.  Subclinical fungal endometritis in an 8-year-old Hanoverian mare.

Authors:  Gregory J Aitken
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 2.  IIB or not IIB, part 1: retrospective evaluation of Kenney-Doig categorization of equine endometrial biopsies at a veterinary diagnostic laboratory and comparison with published reports.

Authors:  Jane Westendorf; Bruce Wobeser; Tasha Epp
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 1.279

3.  A comparative analysis of the intrauterine transcriptome in fertile and subfertile mares using cytobrush sampling.

Authors:  Stefan Bauersachs; Heinrich Bollwein; Katharina S Weber; Karen Wagener; Miguel Blanco
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Type of Inflammation Differentially Affects Expression of Interleukin 1β and 6, Tumor Necrosis Factor-α and Toll-Like Receptors in Subclinical Endometritis in Mares.

Authors:  Marta J Siemieniuch; Anna Z Szóstek; Katarzyna Gajos; Roland Kozdrowski; Marcin Nowak; Kiyoshi Okuda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The usefulness of uterine lavage and acute phase protein levels as a diagnostic tool for subclinical endometritis in Icelandic mares.

Authors:  Monika Sikora; Jarosław Król; Marcin Nowak; Tadeusz Stefaniak; Gudmar Aubertsson; Roland Kozdrowski
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 1.695

6.  Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus Invades and Survives in Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Bolette Skive; Manfred Rohde; Gabriella Molinari; Thomas Hartig Braunstein; Anders M Bojesen
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.293

7.  Histopathological and cytological analyses of endometrium in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) to detect estrus and endometritis.

Authors:  Zahra Salemi; Annahita Rezaie; Saad Goorani Nejad; Babak Mohammadian
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 1.054

8.  A Novel Approach to Minimising Acute Equine Endometritis That May Help to Prevent the Development of the Chronic State.

Authors:  J M Morrell; A Rocha
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-06

9.  Microbial Prevalence and Antimicrobial Sensitivity in Equine Endometritis in Field Conditions.

Authors:  María Luisa Díaz-Bertrana; Stefan Deleuze; Lidia Pitti Rios; Marc Yeste; Inmaculada Morales Fariña; Maria Montserrat Rivera Del Alamo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares.

Authors:  Justyna Buczkowska; Roland Kozdrowski; Marcin Nowak; Andrzej Raś; Zdzisław Staroniewicz; Marta J Siemieniuch
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.