Literature DB >> 21251580

Calcium-channel blockers do not alter the clinical efficacy of clopidogrel after myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study.

Jonas B Olesen1, Gunnar H Gislason, Mette G Charlot, Emil L Fosbøl, Charlotte Andersson, Peter Weeke, Ole Ahlehoff, Christian Selmer, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Peter R Hansen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of adverse cardiovascular events associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI).
BACKGROUND: CCBs inhibit a variety of cytochrome P-450 enzymes, some of which contribute to clopidogrel metabolic activation. This interaction may diminish the efficacy of clopidogrel.
METHODS: All patients surviving 30 days after a first-time MI in the period 2000 to 2006 in Denmark were identified by individual-level linkage of nationwide administrative registers. The cohort was divided into patients treated with and without clopidogrel and followed for 1 year after discharge. The risk of a composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke and the risk of the individual components of the composite end point and all-cause death associated with CCBs were analyzed with multivariable Cox proportional hazard models and in univariate propensity score-matched models.
RESULTS: A total of 56,800 patients were included, of whom 24,923 were treated with clopidogrel and 13,380 with CCBs. In the Cox analyses, the risk of the composite end point associated with CCBs was increased in both patients treated and not treated with clopidogrel, with a hazard ratio of 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 to 1.24) and 1.05 (95% CI: 1.01 to 1.11), respectively. The increased risk was independent of clopidogrel use; the hazard rate ratio was 1.08 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.18). Analyses of all additional adverse end points and propensity score-matched models provided similar results.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical efficacy of clopidogrel in patients with a recent MI is not modified by concomitant CCB treatment. This potential drug interaction is unlikely to have clinical significance.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21251580     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current status of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with coronary or peripheral arterial disease: Mechanisms, evaluation and clinical implications.

Authors:  Stavros Spiliopoulos; Georgios Pastromas
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-26

2.  Clopidogrel and the possibility of drug-drug interaction in primary health care.

Authors:  Inga Urtane; Aleksandra Aitullina; Katrina Pukite
Journal:  J Young Pharm       Date:  2013-03-07

Review 3.  The evolution of antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Omair Yousuf; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Managing adverse effects and drug-drug interactions of antiplatelet agents.

Authors:  Arun Kalyanasundaram; A Michael Lincoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  CYP-mediated pharmacologic interference with optimal platelet inhibition.

Authors:  Thomas Cuisset; Jacques Quilici
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Role of antiplatelet therapy in secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Mathieu Pankert; Jacques Quilici; Thomas Cuisset
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Comparison of the pharmacodynamic effects of ranolazine versus amlodipine on platelet reactivity in stable patients with coronary artery disease treated with dual antiplatelet therapy : The ROMAN (RanOlazine vs. aMlodipine on platelet reactivity in stable patients with CAD treated with dual ANtiplatelet therapy) study.

Authors:  Francesco Pelliccia; Cesare Greco; Carlo Gaudio; Giuseppe Rosano; Cristiana Vitale; Giuseppe Marazzi; Fabiana Rollini; Dominick J Angiolillo
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  The Personalization of Clopidogrel Antiplatelet Therapy: The Role of Integrative Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacometabolomics.

Authors:  Arwa M Amin; Lim Sheau Chin; Dzul Azri Mohamed Noor; Muhamad Ali Sk Abdul Kader; Yuen Kah Hay; Baharudin Ibrahim
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 1.866

9.  Pharmacogenetic association study on clopidogrel response in Puerto Rican Hispanics with cardiovascular disease: a novel characterization of a Caribbean population.

Authors:  Dagmar F Hernandez-Suarez; Mariana R Botton; Stuart A Scott; Matthew I Tomey; Mario J Garcia; Jose Wiley; Pedro A Villablanca; Kyle Melin; Angel Lopez-Candales; Jessicca Y Renta; Jorge Duconge
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2018-06-08

10.  Polypharmacy, potentially serious clinically relevant drug-drug interactions, and inappropriate medicines in elderly people with type 2 diabetes and their impact on quality of life.

Authors:  Labib Al-Musawe; Carla Torre; Jose Pedro Guerreiro; Antonio Teixeira Rodrigues; Joao Filipe Raposo; Helder Mota-Filipe; Ana Paula Martins
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2020-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.