Literature DB >> 21251420

Impact of gastrografin in clinical practice in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Sanket Srinivasa1, Nainoor Thakore, Saleh Abbas, Maryam Mahmood, Arman Adam Kahokehr, Andrew G Hill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastrografin (GG) has been shown to accelerate the resolution of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) and decrease length of stay (LOS) in hospital. Consequently, we instituted a protocol recommending the routine use of GG in patients with ASBO. This study reviews patient outcomes after protocol implementation.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with ASBO from January 1997 to December 2007. Data were categorized by admission date and use of GG. The outcomes reviewed were protocol uptake, median LOS in hospital and operative rate. Results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the 2-tailed Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: There were 710 patients with ASBO overall. Sixteen of 376 (4.3%) patients received GG before institution of the protocol (period 1), whereas 195 of 334 (58.4%) received GG thereafter (period 2). In period 2, use of GG was limited to between 58% and 69% of all potentially eligible patients per year. Fifty-seven of 710 (8%) patients required surgery. In period 1, there were no significant differences in median LOS in hospital (p=0.29) and operative rate (p=0.65) between patients who received GG and those who were managed without GG. In period 2, patients receiving GG had a greater median LOS in hospital (3 [range 2-5] v. 2 [range 1-5] d, p=0.048) but significantly lower operative rates (5.1% v. 12.9%, p=0.018). Overall, the median LOS decreased over time (period 1: 4 [2-7] d v. period 2: 2 [1-5] d, p=0.010). The operative rate did not vary substantially between periods (7.7% v. 8.4%, p=0.42).
CONCLUSION: The introduction of a protocol has increased the proportion of eligible patients receiving GG. However, protocol nonadherence and factors other than GG usage have influenced LOS in hospital and operative rates. Demonstrated benefits from previously published clinical trials have thus not been replicated within our setting.
© 2011 Canadian Medical Association

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21251420      PMCID: PMC3116708          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.024009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  12 in total

1.  Water-soluble contrast media in radiography of small bowel obstruction. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media.

Authors:  A Stordahl; F Laerum; T Gjølberg; I Enge
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Prospective evaluation of oral gastrografin in postoperative small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Sorabh Kapoor; Gaurav Jain; Ajit Sewkani; Sandesh Sharma; Kailash Patel; Subodh Varshney
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of oral water-soluble contrast agent in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  S M Abbas; I P Bissett; B R Parry
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Oral water soluble contrast for the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  S Abbas; I P Bissett; B R Parry
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

5.  The use of water-soluble contrast in evaluating clinically equivocal small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  S Blackmon; C Lucius; J P Wilson; T Duncan; R Wilson; E M Mason; B Ramshaw
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Randomized controlled trial of Gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Jonathan Burge; Saleh M Abbas; Graeme Roadley; Jennifer Donald; Andrew Connolly; Ian P Bissett; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.872

7.  Randomized clinical study of Gastrografin administration in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  S Biondo; D Parés; L Mora; J Martí Ragué; E Kreisler; E Jaurrieta
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  A prospective study on the use of water-soluble contrast follow-through radiology in the management of small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  C C Chung; W C Meng; S C Yu; K L Leung; W Y Lau; A K Li
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1996-09

9.  Therapeutic value of gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction after unsuccessful conservative treatment: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Hok-Kwok Choi; Kin-Wah Chu; Wai-Lun Law
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Role of Gastrografin in assigning patients to a non-operative course in adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Graeme Roadley; Isaac Cranshaw; Michael Young; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.872

View more
  2 in total

1.  Contraindication and End Point of Gastrografin Trial in Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction.

Authors:  Aswini Kumar Misro; Naim Kadoglou
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Fausto Catena; Federico Coccolini; Marica Galati; Nazareno Smerieri; Walter L Biffl; Luca Ansaloni; Gregorio Tugnoli; George C Velmahos; Massimo Sartelli; Cino Bendinelli; Gustavo Pereira Fraga; Michael D Kelly; Frederick A Moore; Vincenzo Mandalà; Stefano Mandalà; Michele Masetti; Elio Jovine; Antonio D Pinna; Andrew B Peitzman; Ari Leppaniemi; Paul H Sugarbaker; Harry Van Goor; Ernest E Moore; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 5.469

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.