Literature DB >> 21249657

20 µg versus >20 µg estrogen combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

Maria F Gallo1, Kavita Nanda, David A Grimes, Laureen M Lopez, Kenneth F Schulz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concern about estrogen-related adverse effects has led to progressive reductions in the estrogen dose in combination oral contraceptives (COCs). However, reducing the amount of estrogen to improve safety could result in decreased contraceptive effectiveness and unacceptable changes in bleeding patterns.
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that COCs containing ≤ 20 μg ethinyl estradiol (EE) perform similarly as those containing > 20 μg in terms of contraceptive effectiveness, bleeding patterns, discontinuation, and side effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP, and examined references of eligible trials. Initially, we wrote to oral contraceptive manufacturers to identify trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: English-language reports of randomized controlled trials were eligible that compare a COC containing ≤ 20 μg EE with a COC containing > 20 μg EE. We excluded studies where the interventions were designed to be administered for less than three consecutive cycles or to be used primarily as treatment for non-contraceptive conditions. Trials had to report on contraceptive effectiveness, bleeding patterns, trial discontinuation due to bleeding-related reasons or other side effects, or side effects to be included in the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One author evaluated all titles and abstracts from literature searches to determine whether they met the inclusion criteria. Two authors independently extracted data from studies identified for inclusion. We wrote to the researchers when additional information was needed. Data were entered and analyzed with RevMan. MAIN
RESULTS: No differences were found in contraceptive effectiveness for the 13 COC pairs for which this outcome was reported. Compared to the higher-estrogen pills, several COCs containing 20 μg EE resulted in higher rates of early trial discontinuation (overall and due to adverse events such as irregular bleeding) as well as increased risk of bleeding disturbances (both amenorrhea or infrequent bleeding and irregular, prolonged, frequent bleeding, or breakthrough bleeding or spotting). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: While COCs containing 20 μg EE may be theoretically safer, this review did not focus on the rare events required to assess this hypothesis. Data from existing randomized controlled trials are inadequate to detect possible differences in contraceptive effectiveness. Low-dose estrogen COCs resulted in higher rates of bleeding pattern disruptions. However, most trials compared COCs containing different progestin types, and changes in bleeding patterns could be related to progestin type as well as estrogen dose. Higher follow-up rates are essential for meaningful interpretation of results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21249657     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003989.pub4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  5 in total

Review 1.  Choosing a combined oral contraceptive pill.

Authors:  Mary Stewart; Kirsten Black
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2015-02-02

2.  Hormonal contraception--what kind, when, and for whom?

Authors:  Inka Wiegratz; Christian J Thaler
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Contraception and mental health: a commentary on the evidence and principles for practice.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Julia R Steinberg; Carrie A Cwiak; Rebecca H Allen; Sheila M Marcus
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Clinical efficacy and metabolic impact of two different dosages of ethinyl-estradiol in association with drospirenone in normal-weight women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized study.

Authors:  D Romualdi; S De Cicco; M Busacca; D Gagliano; A Lanzone; M Guido
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  A chewable low-dose oral contraceptive: a new birth control option?

Authors:  Edith Weisberg
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.711

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.