Literature DB >> 21248103

Opposing gradients of ribbon size and AMPA receptor expression underlie sensitivity differences among cochlear-nerve/hair-cell synapses.

Leslie D Liberman1, Haobing Wang, M Charles Liberman.   

Abstract

The auditory system transduces sound-evoked vibrations over a range of input sound pressure levels spanning six orders of magnitude. An important component of the system mediating this impressive dynamic range is established in the cochlear sensory epithelium, where functional subtypes of cochlear nerve fibers differ in threshold sensitivity, and spontaneous discharge rate (SR), by more than a factor of 1000 (Liberman, 1978), even though, regardless of type, each fiber contacts only a single hair cell via a single ribbon synapse. To study the mechanisms underlying this remarkable heterogeneity in threshold sensitivity among the 5-30 primary sensory fibers innervating a single inner hair cell, we quantified the sizes of presynaptic ribbons and postsynaptic AMPA receptor patches in >1200 synapses, using high-power confocal imaging of mouse cochleas immunostained for CtBP2 (C-terminal binding protein 2, a major ribbon protein) and GluR2/3 (glutamate receptors 2 and 3). We document complementary gradients, most striking in mid-cochlear regions, whereby synapses from the modiolar face and/or basal pole of the inner hair cell have larger ribbons and smaller receptor patches than synapses located in opposite regions of the cell. The AMPA receptor expression gradient likely contributes to the differences in cochlear nerve threshold and SR seen on the two sides of the hair cell in vivo (Liberman, 1982a); the differences in ribbon size may contribute to the heterogeneity of EPSC waveforms seen in vitro (Grant et al., 2010).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21248103      PMCID: PMC3290333          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3389-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  36 in total

1.  Effects of continuous noise backgrounds on rate response of auditory nerve fibers in cat.

Authors:  J A Costalupes; E D Young; D J Gibson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Single-neuron labeling in the cat auditory nerve.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-06-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Efferent synapses in the inner hair cell area of the cat cochlea: an electron microscopic study of serial sections.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones.

Authors:  D H Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Morphological differences among radial afferent fibers in the cat cochlea: an electron-microscopic study of serial sections.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Different patterns of cochlear innervation during the development of the kitten.

Authors:  R Pujol; E Carlier; C Devigne
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1978-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Onset coding is degraded in auditory nerve fibers from mutant mice lacking synaptic ribbons.

Authors:  Bradley N Buran; Nicola Strenzke; Andreas Neef; Eckart D Gundelfinger; Tobias Moser; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Comparative distribution of glutamate transporters and receptors in relation to afferent innervation density in the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  David N Furness; D Maxwell Lawton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  117 in total

1.  Cochlear kainate receptors.

Authors:  Marcello Peppi; Melissa Landa; William F Sewell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-10

2.  Inner hair cell ribbon synapse plasticity might be molecular basis of temporary hearing threshold shifts in mice.

Authors:  Haolin Wang; Ning Zhao; Kaisheng Yan; Xiuli Liu; Yue Zhang; Zhijun Hong; Mingyu Wang; Qing Yin; Feifeng Wu; Yu Lei; Xiaoyan Li; Lin Shi; Ke Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01

Review 3.  Cochlear synaptopathy in acquired sensorineural hearing loss: Manifestations and mechanisms.

Authors:  M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of repeated "benign" noise exposures in young CBA mice: shedding light on age-related hearing loss.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Chongyu Ren
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-25

5.  Hair Cell Mechanotransduction Regulates Spontaneous Activity and Spiral Ganglion Subtype Specification in the Auditory System.

Authors:  Shuohao Sun; Travis Babola; Gabriela Pregernig; Kathy S So; Matthew Nguyen; Shin-San M Su; Adam T Palermo; Dwight E Bergles; Joseph C Burns; Ulrich Müller
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  I h and HCN channels in murine spiral ganglion neurons: tonotopic variation, local heterogeneity, and kinetic model.

Authors:  Qing Liu; Paul B Manis; Robin L Davis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-21

7.  Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Sensory Neuron Diversity in the Inner Ear Is Shaped by Activity.

Authors:  Brikha R Shrestha; Chester Chia; Lorna Wu; Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman; Lisa V Goodrich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Efferent feedback minimizes cochlear neuropathy from moderate noise exposure.

Authors:  Stéphane F Maison; Hajime Usubuchi; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Thrombospondins 1 and 2 are important for afferent synapse formation and function in the inner ear.

Authors:  Diana Mendus; Srividya Sundaresan; Nicolas Grillet; Felix Wangsawihardja; Rose Leu; Ulrich Müller; Sherri M Jones; Mirna Mustapha
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.