Literature DB >> 21247723

Cancer diagnosis and outcomes in Michigan EDs vs other settings.

Veronica Sikka1, Joseph P Ornato.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study determined the proportion of incident colorectal and lung cancers with a diagnosis associated with an emergency department (ED) visit. The characteristics of these patients and the correlation between diagnosis near an ED visit and stage at diagnosis were also examined.
METHODS: A population-based sample of all Michigan cancer cases diagnosed in all EDs and other health care settings was used to extract a sample of patients >65 years old, diagnosed with colorectal and lung cancers between January 1, 1996, and June 30, 2000 (n = 20 311). Logistic regressions were used for the statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Patients with a colorectal cancer diagnosis associated with an ED visit were more likely insured by Medicaid before diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.60), had an inpatient admission before diagnosis (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.06-1.56), had 3 or more comorbidities (OR, 4.11; 95% CI, 3.53-4.79), were more likely to be female (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.31), and were more likely to be aged 85 years and older (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.57-2.27). Patients who had at least one primary care physician (PCP) visit before diagnosis were less likely to have a diagnosis associated with an ED visit (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.61-0.76). Patients diagnosed with lung cancer in association with an ED visit were also more likely to have an inpatient admission before diagnosis (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.43), a higher comorbidity burden (OR, 12.44; 95% CI, 10.18-15.20), be female (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.25), African-American (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.21-1.66), and older (80 years and older) (ages 80-84 years: OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.57; age 85 years and older: OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.25-1.85). Patients with an ED visit near a colorectal cancer (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.15-1.42) or lung cancer diagnosis (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.44-1.88) were more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage compared with patients diagnosed in other settings.
CONCLUSIONS: An examination of patients' patterns of care leading to a cancer diagnosis in association with an ED visit lends insight to conditions precipitating a more immediate diagnosis and their associated outcomes. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21247723     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  14 in total

1.  Diagnosis Setting and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes: The Impact of Cancer Diagnosis in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  David Weithorn; Vanessa Arientyl; Ian Solsky; Goyal Umadat; Rebecca Levine; Bruce Rapkin; Jason Leider; Haejin In
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Reduced Survival Outcome After Receiving a New Cancer Diagnosis in the Emergency Department: Findings from a Hospital Network in Rural Eastern North Carolina.

Authors:  Hannah L Conley; C Suzanne Lea; Raven V Delgado; Paul Vos; Eleanor E Harris; Andrew Ju; Kimberly M Rathbun
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-10-10

3.  Gender-specific differences in care-seeking behaviour among lung cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rezwanul Hasan Rana; Fariha Alam; Khorshed Alam; Jeff Gow
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Comorbid chronic diseases and cancer diagnosis: disease-specific effects and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Cristina Renzi; Aradhna Kaushal; Jon Emery; Willie Hamilton; Richard D Neal; Bernard Rachet; Greg Rubin; Hardeep Singh; Fiona M Walter; Niek J de Wit; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Risk factors for emergency presentation with lung and colorectal cancers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Mitchell; Benjamin Pickwell-Smith; Una Macleod
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Does emergency presentation of cancer represent poor performance in primary care? Insights from a novel analysis of linked primary and secondary care data.

Authors:  Peter Murchie; Sarah M Smith; Michael S Yule; Rosalind Adam; Melanie E Turner; Amanda J Lee; Shona Fielding
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Missed opportunities: racial and neighborhood socioeconomic disparities in emergency colorectal cancer diagnosis and surgery.

Authors:  Sandi L Pruitt; Nicholas O Davidson; Samir Gupta; Yan Yan; Mario Schootman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Cancer diagnosed by emergency admission in England: an observational study using the general practice research database.

Authors:  Carmen Tsang; Alex Bottle; Azeem Majeed; Paul Aylin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC3) in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Valentina Bianchi; Alessandra Spitale; Laura Ortelli; Luca Mazzucchelli; Andrea Bordoni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data.

Authors:  Gary A Abel; Silvia C Mendonca; Sean McPhail; Yin Zhou; Lucy Elliss-Brookes; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.