BACKGROUND: The authors examined whether survivors from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study were less likely to be in higher-skill occupations than a sibling comparison and whether certain survivors were at higher risk for lower-skill jobs. METHODS: The authors created 3 mutually exclusive occupational categories for participants aged ≥ 25 years: Managerial/Professional, Nonphysical Service/Blue Collar, and Physical Service/Blue Collar. The authors examined currently employed survivors (4845) and their siblings (1727) in multivariable generalized linear models to evaluate the likelihood of being in 1 of the 3 occupational categories. Multinomial logistic regression was used among all participants to examine the likelihood of these outcomes compared to being unemployed (survivors, 6671; siblings, 2129). Multivariable linear models were used to assess survivor occupational differences by cancer- and treatment-related variables. Personal income was compared by occupation. RESULTS: Employed survivors were less often in higher-skilled Managerial/Professional occupations (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.98) than their siblings. Survivors who were black, were diagnosed at a younger age, or had high-dose cranial radiation were less likely to hold Managerial/Professional occupations than other survivors. In multinomial models, female survivors' likelihood of being in full-time Managerial/Professional occupations (27%) was lower than male survivors (42%) and female (41%) and male (50%) siblings. Survivors' personal income was lower than siblings within each of the 3 occupational categories in models adjusted for sociodemographic variables. CONCLUSIONS: Adult childhood cancer survivors are employed in lower-skill jobs than siblings. Survivors with certain treatment histories are at higher risk for lower-skill jobs and may require vocational assistance throughout adulthood.
BACKGROUND: The authors examined whether survivors from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study were less likely to be in higher-skill occupations than a sibling comparison and whether certain survivors were at higher risk for lower-skill jobs. METHODS: The authors created 3 mutually exclusive occupational categories for participants aged ≥ 25 years: Managerial/Professional, Nonphysical Service/Blue Collar, and Physical Service/Blue Collar. The authors examined currently employed survivors (4845) and their siblings (1727) in multivariable generalized linear models to evaluate the likelihood of being in 1 of the 3 occupational categories. Multinomial logistic regression was used among all participants to examine the likelihood of these outcomes compared to being unemployed (survivors, 6671; siblings, 2129). Multivariable linear models were used to assess survivor occupational differences by cancer- and treatment-related variables. Personal income was compared by occupation. RESULTS: Employed survivors were less often in higher-skilled Managerial/Professional occupations (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.98) than their siblings. Survivors who were black, were diagnosed at a younger age, or had high-dose cranial radiation were less likely to hold Managerial/Professional occupations than other survivors. In multinomial models, female survivors' likelihood of being in full-time Managerial/Professional occupations (27%) was lower than male survivors (42%) and female (41%) and male (50%) siblings. Survivors' personal income was lower than siblings within each of the 3 occupational categories in models adjusted for sociodemographic variables. CONCLUSIONS: Adult childhood cancer survivors are employed in lower-skill jobs than siblings. Survivors with certain treatment histories are at higher risk for lower-skill jobs and may require vocational assistance throughout adulthood.
Authors: Anne C Kirchhoff; Wendy Leisenring; Kevin R Krull; Kirsten K Ness; Debra L Friedman; Gregory T Armstrong; Marilyn Stovall; Elyse R Park; Kevin C Oeffinger; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Thomas Wickizer Journal: Med Care Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Sharon M Castellino; Jacqueline Casillas; Melissa M Hudson; Ann C Mertens; John Whitton; Sandra L Brooks; Lonnie K Zeltzer; Arthur Ablin; Robert Castleberry; Wendy Hobbie; Sue Kaste; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-09-20 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Kirsten K Ness; Ann C Mertens; Melissa M Hudson; Melanie M Wall; Wendy M Leisenring; Kevin C Oeffinger; Charles A Sklar; Leslie L Robison; James G Gurney Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 51.598
Authors: Pauline A Mitby; Leslie L Robison; John A Whitton; Michael A Zevon; Iris C Gibbs; Jean M Tersak; Anna T Meadows; Marilyn Stovall; Lonnie K Zeltzer; Ann C Mertens Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Roger J Packer; James G Gurney; Judy A Punyko; Sarah S Donaldson; Peter D Inskip; Marilyn Stovall; Yutaka Yasui; Ann C Mertens; Charles A Sklar; H Stacy Nicholson; Lonnie K Zeltzer; Joseph P Neglia; Leslie L Robison Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-09-01 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Deborah B Crom; Zhenghong Li; Tara M Brinkman; Melissa M Hudson; Gregory T Armstrong; Joseph Neglia; Kirsten K Ness Journal: J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 1.636
Authors: Matthew J Ehrhardt; Daniel A Mulrooney; Chenghong Li; Malek J Baassiri; Kari Bjornard; John T Sandlund; Tara M Brinkman; I-Chan Huang; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Kirsten K Ness; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin R Krull Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Deborah B Crom; Kirsten K Ness; Larry R Martinez; Michelle R Hebl; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Tara M Brinkman Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-03-17 Impact factor: 4.442