Literature DB >> 21246480

Liver lesion segmentation in MSCT: effect of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision and interobserver variability.

M Puesken1, B Buerke, R Fortkamp, R Koch, H Seifarth, W Heindel, J Wessling.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of slice thickness on semi-automated liver lesion segmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, liver MSCT scans from 60 patients were reconstructed at a slice thickness of 1.5 mm, 3 mm and 5 mm. 106 liver lesions (8 - 64 mm, mean size 25 ± 13 mm) were evaluated independently by two radiologists using semi-automated segmentation software (OncoTreat®). Lesions were classified as cystic, hypodense and hyperdense according to their contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The long axis diameter (LAD), short axis diameter (SAD) and volume were measured. The necessity for manual correction (NOC = relative difference between uncorrected and corrected volume) and the relative interobserver difference (RID) were determined. Precision was calculated in terms of relative measurement deviations (RMD) from the reference standard (mean of 1.5 mm data sets). Wilcoxon test, t-test and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were employed for statistical analysis. All statistical analyses were intended to be exploratory.
RESULTS: Regardless of the liver lesion subtype, the NOC was found to be significantly higher for 5 mm than for 3 mm (p = 0.035) and 1.5 mm (p = 0.0002). The RID was consistently low for metric and volumetric parameters with no difference in any of the slice thicknesses for all subtypes (ICC > 0.89). The RMD increased significantly for the LAD, SAD and volume at a slice thickness of 5 mm (p < 0.01), e. g. volume: 0.5 % at 1.5 mm, 5.5 % at 3.0 mm and 7.6 % at 5.0 mm.
CONCLUSION: Since the deviations in measurements are significant, and manual corrections made during semi-automated assessment of the liver lesions are considerable, a slice thickness of 1.5 mm, and no more than 3.0 mm, should be used for reconstruction for inconsistently vascularized liver lesions. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21246480     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  2 in total

1.  Workflow-centred evaluation of an automatic lesion tracking software for chemotherapy monitoring by CT.

Authors:  Jan Hendrik Moltz; Melvin D'Anastasi; Andreas Kiessling; Daniel Pinto dos Santos; Christoph Schülke; Heinz-Otto Peitgen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Accuracy of estimation of graft size for living-related liver transplantation: first results of a semi-automated interactive software for CT-volumetry.

Authors:  Theresa Mokry; Nadine Bellemann; Dirk Müller; Justo Lorenzo Bermejo; Miriam Klauß; Ulrike Stampfl; Boris Radeleff; Peter Schemmer; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Christof-Matthias Sommer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.