Literature DB >> 21246345

[Education of medical students in urology in Germany: present status].

T Strunk1, S C Mueller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a growing demand for doctors in Germany and diseases of the genitourinary tract have become more prevalent in recent years. Politicians plan to increase the number of students in an already heavily overloaded system but data on quality and structure of medical education in Urology are lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent and quality of undergraduate medical education in urology.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Departments of Urology at German University Hospitals were surveyed using a questionnaire. Questions covered four different fields of medical education and answers were analyzed by descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Of the teachers involved in medical education 97% are physicians and 4% of these have special didactic qualifications. On average 1 teacher is responsible for 13 students and 44% of departments also have to carry out medical duties during teaching lessons. More than half of the departments offer modern learning forms, such as e-learning, problem-oriented learning or skills laboratory training.
CONCLUSIONS: Urology departments at German University Hospitals spend much time on medical education. Nearly all physicians are involved in medical education, whether they are experienced or not and in many cases teaching is carried out in parallel to patient care. In more than half of the cases modern education tools were employed which implies a good standard of quality but there are no data on outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21246345     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-010-2493-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  7 in total

1.  Rectal examination and urethral catheterization by medical students and house officers: taught but not used.

Authors:  K J Turner; S F Brewster
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Experience and attitudes of final-year medical students to digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Damien M Bolton
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  A multi-institutional randomized controlled trial of adjuvant Web-based teaching to medical students.

Authors:  B Price Kerfoot; Harley Baker; Thomas L Jackson; William C Hulbert; Daniel D Federman; Robert D Oates; William C DeWolf
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  The continued decline of formal urological education of medical students in the United States: does it matter?

Authors:  B Price Kerfoot; Barbara A Masser; William C Dewolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  [Evaluation of the practical skills of final year medical students: example of bladder catheterization].

Authors:  P Bigot; M Rouprêt; M Orsat; N Benoist; S Larré; D Chautard; I Richard; J-P Saint-André; A R Azzouzi
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 0.915

6.  Deficits in urological knowledge among medical students and primary care providers: potential for impact on urological care.

Authors:  Alek Mishail; Mehzad Shahsavari; Jason Kim; Robert C Welliver; Praneeth Vemulapalli; Howard L Adler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Survey of undergraduate teaching in genitourinary medicine in Britain.

Authors:  F M Cowan; M W Adler
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-10
  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  [Objects from scientific collections in demand: the value of the various collections of the Urologic History Center of the German Society of Urology for modern teaching purposes in urology].

Authors:  F H Moll
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Is the training and continuing education for urologists in Germany still up to date?].

Authors:  S C Müller; T Strunk
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Educating transurethral electroresection of the prostate is safe and efficient: is training a risk factor for patients and hospitals?].

Authors:  G Fechner; J Schaupp; S Hauser; S C Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  [Rheumatology training for medical students. Comparison of learning success and acceptance with virtual vs. real patient demonstrations].

Authors:  C Madl; G Keyßer
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 5.  [New approbation regulations-new concepts in urological undergraduate training?]

Authors:  C Siech; J König; L A Kluth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Bringing excellence into urology: How to improve the future training of residents?

Authors:  Arkadiusz Miernik; Sabina Sevcenco; Franklin Emmanuel Kuehhas; Christian Bach; Noor Buchholz; Fabian Adams; Konrad Wilhelm; Martin Schoenthaler
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-07-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.