OBJECTIVE: This study aims at improving diagnosis of intestinal ischemia, by measuring plasma and urinary fatty acid binding protein (FABP) levels. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients suspected of intestinal ischemia were included and blood and urine were sampled at time of suspicion. Plasma and urinary concentrations of intestinal FABP (I-FABP), liver FABP (L-FABP) and ileal bile acid binding protein (I-BABP) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients suspected of intestinal ischemia were diagnosed with intestinal ischemia, 24 patients were diagnosed with other diseases, and 4 patients were excluded from further analysis fulfilling exclusion criteria. Median plasma concentrations of I-FABP and L-FABP and urinary concentrations of all 3 markers were significantly higher in patients with proven intestinal ischemia than in patients suspected of intestinal ischemia with other final diagnoses (plasma I-FABP; 653 pg/mL vs. 109 pg/mL, P = 0.02, plasma L-FABP; 117 ng/mL vs. 25 ng/mL, P = 0.006, urine I-FABP; 3377 pg/mL vs. 115 pg/mL, P = 0.001, urine L-FABP; 1,199 ng/mL vs. 37 ng/mL, P =0.004, urine I-BABP; 48.6 ng/mL vs. 0.6 ng/mL, P = 0.002). Positive and negative likelihood ratios significantly increased positive posttest probability and decreased negative posttest probability on intestinal ischemia. In patients with intestinal ischemia a trend to higher plasma I-BABP levels was observed when the ileum was involved (18.4 ng/mL vs. 2.9 ng/mL, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Plasma and especially urinary I-FABP and L-FABP levels and urinary I-BABP levels can improve early diagnosis of intestinal ischemia. Furthermore, plasma I-BABP levels can help in localizing ileal ischemia.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims at improving diagnosis of intestinal ischemia, by measuring plasma and urinary fatty acid binding protein (FABP) levels. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients suspected of intestinal ischemia were included and blood and urine were sampled at time of suspicion. Plasma and urinary concentrations of intestinal FABP (I-FABP), liver FABP (L-FABP) and ileal bile acid binding protein (I-BABP) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients suspected of intestinal ischemia were diagnosed with intestinal ischemia, 24 patients were diagnosed with other diseases, and 4 patients were excluded from further analysis fulfilling exclusion criteria. Median plasma concentrations of I-FABP and L-FABP and urinary concentrations of all 3 markers were significantly higher in patients with proven intestinal ischemia than in patients suspected of intestinal ischemia with other final diagnoses (plasma I-FABP; 653 pg/mL vs. 109 pg/mL, P = 0.02, plasma L-FABP; 117 ng/mL vs. 25 ng/mL, P = 0.006, urine I-FABP; 3377 pg/mL vs. 115 pg/mL, P = 0.001, urine L-FABP; 1,199 ng/mL vs. 37 ng/mL, P =0.004, urine I-BABP; 48.6 ng/mL vs. 0.6 ng/mL, P = 0.002). Positive and negative likelihood ratios significantly increased positive posttest probability and decreased negative posttest probability on intestinal ischemia. In patients with intestinal ischemia a trend to higher plasma I-BABP levels was observed when the ileum was involved (18.4 ng/mL vs. 2.9 ng/mL, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Plasma and especially urinary I-FABP and L-FABP levels and urinary I-BABP levels can improve early diagnosis of intestinal ischemia. Furthermore, plasma I-BABP levels can help in localizing ileal ischemia.
Authors: Valentina Volynets; Andreas Rings; Gyöngyi Bárdos; Maureen J Ostaff; Jan Wehkamp; Stephan C Bischoff Journal: Tissue Barriers Date: 2016-07-08
Authors: V D Plat; J P M Derikx; A C Jongen; K Nielsen; D J A Sonneveld; J J C Tersteeg; R M P H Crolla; D A van Dam; H A Cense; T G J de Meij; J B Tuynman; N K H de Boer; F Daams Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Teun C van den Heijkant; Bart A C Aerts; Joep A Teijink; Wim A Buurman; Misha D P Luyer Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 5.742