Literature DB >> 21245655

Adjuvants and alternative routes of administration towards the development of the ideal influenza vaccine.

Paolo Durando1, Rocco Iudici, Cristiano Alicino, Marisa Alberti, Daniela de Florentis, Filippo Ansaldi, Giancarlo Icardi.   

Abstract

Vaccination is universally considered as the principal measure for the control of influenza, which represents a significant burden worldwide, both from a health-care and a socio-economic viewpoint. Conventional non-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccines (TIVs) have been recognized as having some deficiencies, such as suboptimal immunogenicity particularly in the elderly, in patients with severe chronic diseases and immunocompromized, indeed, those groups of the population at higher risk of developing severe complications following influenza infection, when compared to healthy adults. Moreover, the protection offered by conventional vaccines may be reduced by periodic antigenic drifts, resulting in a mismatch between the circulating and vaccinal viral strains. Another gap regarding currently available vaccines is related to the egg-based manufacturing system for their production: not only the length of time involved with the latter but also the limited capacity of this platform technology represent a major limitation for the active prevention of influenza, which is particularly important in the case of a new pandemic strain. New technologies used in vaccine composition, administration and manufacture have led to major advances during the last few years, and clinical researchers have continued to work hard, investigating several different strategies to improve the performance of influenza vaccines: namely, the addition of different adjuvants (i.e., MF59- and AS03-vaccines, virosomal formulations), the use of alternative routes of administration or manufacture (i.e., intradermal, nasal and oral vaccines and cell culture- and reverse genetic-based vaccines) or of high doses of antigen, and the development of DNA-vaccines, or the use of conserved viral epitopes (i.e., the extracellular portion of the M2 protein, the nucleoprotein and some domains of the hemagglutinin), in the attempt to produce a "universal target" antigen vaccine. The knowledge acquired represents a fundamental challenge for the control of influenza. An overview of the most recent and interesting results, some of which gained from our own research experience, particularly concerning two successful approaches, of those outlined above, namely the use of: (i) the oil-in-water MF59-adjuvant, and (ii) the intradermal (ID) route for vaccine administration, through a novel microinjection system, will be reported and discussed, together with the possible implications and perspectives to optimize immunization policies against influenza in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21245655     DOI: 10.4161/hv.7.0.14560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin        ISSN: 1554-8600


  26 in total

Review 1.  Traditional and new influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Sook-San Wong; Richard J Webby
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Influenza virosomes supplemented with GPI-0100 adjuvant: a potent vaccine formulation for antigen dose sparing.

Authors:  Heng Liu; Jacqueline de Vries-Idema; Wouter Ter Veer; Jan Wilschut; Anke Huckriede
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Immunogenicity of intramuscular MF59-adjuvanted and intradermal administered influenza enhanced vaccines in subjects aged over 60: A literature review.

Authors:  Barbara Camilloni; Michela Basileo; Stefano Valente; Emilia Nunzi; Anna Maria Iorio
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Immunogenicity of Standard-Dose Intramuscular Versus Intradermal Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex With Men in Bangkok, Thailand.

Authors:  Shikha Garg; Prasert Thongcharoen; Prabda Praphasiri; Anupong Chitwarakorn; Pornchai Sathirapanya; Stefan Fernandez; Kamonthip Rungrojcharoenkit; Wannee Chonwattana; Philip A Mock; Wichuda Sukwicha; Jacqueline M Katz; Marc-Alain Widdowson; Marcel E Curlin; Robert V Gibbons; Timothy H Holtz; Fatimah S Dawood; Sonja J Olsen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  Influenza vaccination in the elderly.

Authors:  Jan Smetana; Roman Chlibek; Jana Shaw; Miroslav Splino; Roman Prymula
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Influenza vaccination in children primed with MF59-adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Timo Vesikari; Aino Forstén; Ashwani Arora; Theodore Tsai; Ralf Clemens
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Protection of young children from influenza through universal vaccination.

Authors:  Nicola Principi; Laura Senatore; Susanna Esposito
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Intanza (®) 9 µg intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine for adults 18 to 59 years of age.

Authors:  Isabel Leroux-Roels; Françoise Weber
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Intralymphatic immunotherapy and vaccination in mice.

Authors:  Pål Johansen; Thomas M Kündig
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  Vaccine strategies to enhance immune responses in the aged.

Authors:  Julie S Lefebvre; Laura Haynes
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 7.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.