Literature DB >> 21244740

Transpalatal greater palatine canal injection: Radioanatomic analysis of where to bend the needle for pediatric sinus surgery.

Kibwei A McKinney1, Michael E Stadler, Yu-Tung Wong, Rupali N Shah, Austin S Rose, Carlton J Zdanski, Charles S Ebert, Stephen A Wheless, Brent A Senior, Amelia F Drake, Adam M Zanation.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The greater palatine canal (GPC) local injection is used to limit posterior bleeding during sinus surgery in adults. Given the potential for causing iatrogenic damage to the intraorbital contents, this procedure is not commonly used in the pediatric population. No studies have described the anatomic development of the GPC during facial growth. By using age-stratified radioanatomic analysis, the dimensions of the GPC and the clinical implications are described for pediatric patients. An age-stratified radioanatomic study was performed.
METHODS: High-resolution computed tomography measurements included the thickness of the mucosal plane overlying the GPC, the length of the GPC, and the distance between the base of the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) and the orbital floor. Mean distance and standard deviation were calculated for each age cohort and compared using the one-way ANOVA test.
RESULTS: The GPC length correlated directly with patient age. It varied from 9.14 ± 0.11 mm in the youngest age group (<2 years) to 19.36 ± 2.76 mm in adults (18-64 years). The height of the orbit relative to the hard palate approximated the adult dimensions described in the literature by 12-13 years (49.58 ± 1.72 mm).
CONCLUSION: These radioanatomic results suggest that the GPC injection described for adult patients may be safely administered to selected pediatric patients. For patients >12 years old, we recommend bending the needle 45° and inserting it 25 mm. For patients 6-12 years old, the needle should be inserted 20 mm to enter into the PPF. In patients <6 years old, the needle may safely be placed 12 mm into the GPC. Each of these descriptions is based on the minimal distance required to effectively access the PPF but with maximal safety in regard to the orbit. Further clinical correlation of these findings is necessary through future investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21244740      PMCID: PMC3076194          DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  15 in total

1.  CT anatomy of pterygopalatine fossa and its communications: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Nuri Erdogan; Erdogan Unur; Murat Baykara
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.790

2.  Sphenopalatine ganglion block before removal of nasal packing.

Authors:  Juen-Haur Hwang; Chia-Ming Liu; Tien-Chen Liu; Ming-Che Hsu
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Predicting depth of insertion of needle required to anesthetize the maxillary nerve by way of the pterygopalatine canal.

Authors:  A R VIEGAS; F M HEMPHILL
Journal:  J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv       Date:  1961-03

4.  The second division block via the pterygopalatin canal.

Authors:  W A COOK
Journal:  Dent Items Interest       Date:  1950-12

5.  Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: Part II. Normal values and growth trends.

Authors:  A A Waitzman; J C Posnick; D C Armstrong; G E Pron
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1992-03

6.  Infratemporal fossa abscess: complication of dental injection.

Authors:  Douglas Leventhal; David N Schwartz
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-05

7.  Greater palatine foramen injection made easy.

Authors:  J A Stankiewicz
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 8.  Pediatric sinusitis: when do we operate?

Authors:  John D Lieser; Craig S Derkay
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  High-resolution computed tomography analysis of the greater palatine canal.

Authors:  Subinoy Das; Doil Kim; Trinitia Y Cannon; Charles S Ebert; Brent A Senior
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

10.  Anatomy and development of the pterygopalatomaxillary region, studied in relation to Le Fort osteotomies.

Authors:  B Melsen; D K Ousterhout
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.539

View more
  5 in total

1.  Is Pterygopalatine Fossa Injection with Adrenaline an Effective Technique for Better Surgical Field in Fess?

Authors:  Vijendra S Shenoy; Nidhin Prakash; Panduranga M Kamath; Raghavendra A Rao; D Deviprasad; Vishnu Prasad; Vikranth Kamboj; Lavan Kumar Borra
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-10-10

2.  Usefulness of Curved-Shaft Needles for Infiltrating the Sphenopalatine Area.

Authors:  So Young Choi; Ho Yun Lee; Myoung Su Choi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-07-27

3.  Computed tomography morphometric analysis of the greater palatine canal: a study of 1,500 head CT scans and a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Iwona M Tomaszewska; Elizabeth K Kmiotek; Iwona Z Pena; Michał Średniawa; Katarzyna Czyżowska; Robert Chrzan; Michał Nowakowski; Jerzy A Walocha
Journal:  Anat Sci Int       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 1.741

4.  Radio-anatomical Study of the Greater Palatine Canal and the Pterygopalatine Fossa in a Lebanese Population: A Consideration for Maxillary Nerve Block.

Authors:  Georges Aoun; Ibrahim Nasseh; Sayde Sokhn
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2016-09-19

5.  Length and anatomic routes of the greater palatine canal as observed by cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Mahnaz Sheikhi; Asieh Zamaninaser; Faranak Jalalian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.