Literature DB >> 21244568

A comparison of GlideScope(®) videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation in children.

Hyun-Jung Kim1, Jin-Tae Kim, Hee-Soo Kim, Chong-Sung Kim, Seong-Deok Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relative effectiveness of GlideScope(®) videolaryngoscopy (GV) for nasotracheal intubation in pediatric patients is unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of GV for nasotracheal intubation compared with direct laryngoscopy (DL) in pediatric patients.
METHODS: Our patient cohort consisted of 80 children <10 years of age who required nasotracheal intubation for elective dental or facial surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to GV (n = 40) or DL (n = 40) group. The time to intubation (TTI), glottic view grade, frequency of Magill forceps use, and degree of difficulty in intubation were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median TTI was similar between the groups. The TTI of the former 20 patients was faster in the DL group (53.3 s, interquartile range: 42.0-64.3) than GV group (65.9 s, interquartile range: 56.0-93.9) (P = 0.007), whereas the TTI of the latter 20 patients was comparable between the groups. There were no significant differences in glottic view grade, frequency of Magill forceps use, and degree of difficulty in intubation between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: GV can provide similar intubation performance characteristics compared with DL when used for nasotracheal intubation in pediatric patients. However, experience is needed to be skillful in the GV to acquire comparable TTI with DL.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21244568     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03517.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  4 in total

Review 1.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates).

Authors:  Ibtihal S Abdelgadir; Robert S Phillips; Davinder Singh; Michael P Moncreiff; Joanne L Lumsden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-24

Review 2.  Evolution of videolaryngoscopy in pediatric population.

Authors:  Anju Gupta; Ridhima Sharma; Nishkarsh Gupta
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-10

3.  A comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope, McGrath video laryngoscope, and Pentax Airway Scope in paediatric nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Ji Young Yoo; Yun Jeong Chae; Young Bok Lee; Sujin Kim; Jaemoon Lee; Dae Hee Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Video Laryngoscopy Using King Vision™ aBlade™ and Direct Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Airway Management: A Randomized Controlled Study about Device Learning by Anaesthesia Residents.

Authors:  Katharina Epp; Sophie Zimmermann; Eva Wittenmeier; Marc Kriege; Frank Dette; Irene Schmidtmann; Nina Pirlich
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.