Literature DB >> 21244514

Instrument-order effects: using the Oral Health Impact Profile 49 and the Short Form 12.

Jacobien Marije Kieffer1, Gijsbert Hendrik Willem Verrips, Johan Hoogstraten.   

Abstract

Whereas it is well known that the ordering of items can influence research outcomes considerably, very little literature addresses instrument-order effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of changing the administrative order of the Short-Form-12 (SF-12) and the Oral Health Impact Profile-49 (OHIP-49). It was hypothesized that if the SF-12 was administered first, the results would show poorer scores on the SF-12 subscales, as responses would not be restrained to only the oral impacts described by the OHIP-49. Using the Mann-Whitney U-test no significant instrument-order effects were found, except for the Psychological discomfort scale of the OHIP-49, where subjects scored higher when receiving the OHIP-49 first. However, the effect size was negligible (-0.08). These results suggest that no instrument-order effects occurred. Nonetheless, more research dealing with different instruments is needed. This study was performed within a dental setting and we recommend that instrument-order effects should be studied outside this domain.
© 2011 Eur J Oral Sci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21244514     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00796.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci        ISSN: 0909-8836            Impact factor:   2.612


  6 in total

1.  Bias in retrospective assessment of perceived dental treatment effects when using the Oral Health Impact Profile.

Authors:  Daniel R Reissmann; Antje Erler; Christian Hirsch; Ira Sierwald; Carolina Machuca; Oliver Schierz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Effects of patient-reported outcome assessment order.

Authors:  Paul J Novotny; Amylou C Dueck; Daniel Satele; Marlene H Frost; Timothy J Beebe; Kathleen J Yost; Minji K Lee; David T Eton; Susan Yount; David Cella; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland; Victoria Blinder; Ethan Basch; Jeff A Sloan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.599

3.  The Canadian systemic sclerosis oral health study: orofacial manifestations and oral health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis compared with the general population.

Authors:  Murray Baron; Marie Hudson; Solène Tatibouet; Russell Steele; Ernest Lo; Sabrina Gravel; Geneviève Gyger; Tarek El Sayegh; Janet Pope; Audrey Fontaine; Ariel Masseto; Debora Matthews; Evelyn Sutton; Norman Thie; Niall Jones; Maria Copete; Dean Kolbinson; Janet Markland; Getulio Nogueira-Filho; David Robinson; Mervyn Gornitsky
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adult Dental Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hina Mittal; Mike T John; Stella Sekulić; Nicole Theis-Mahon; Ksenija Rener-Sitar
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.267

5.  Interpreting one oral health impact profile point.

Authors:  Daniel R Reissmann; Ira Sierwald; Guido Heydecke; Mike T John
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Comparing the order of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy and the Demographic and Health Survey question on pregnancy intention in a single group of postnatal women in Malawi - the effect of question order on assessment of pregnancy intention.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hall; Judith Stephenson; Geraldine Barrett
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-07-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.