Literature DB >> 21244500

Effect of anorganic bovine bone to autogenous cortical bone ratio upon bone remodeling patterns following maxillary sinus augmentation.

Pablo Galindo-Moreno1, Ildefonso Moreno-Riestra, Gustavo Avila, Miguel Padial-Molina, Jorge A Paya, Hom-Lay Wang, Francisco O'Valle.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Maxillary sinus augmentation is a predictable implant site development technique, although several local and systemic factors may influence outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate healing patterns and bone remodeling activity following the use of two different graft mixtures for maxillary sinus augmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in need of maxillary sinus augmentation were randomly assigned to two different groups. A graft mixture using a 50% autologous bone (AB) to 50% anorganic bovine bone (ABB) ratio was used in group 1, while a 20% AB to 80% ABB ratio was utilized for group 2. After a 6-month healing period, bone core biopsies were harvested for histological, histomorphometrical, and immunohistochemical analyses.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects participated in this study. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in regards to vital bone and non-mineralized tissue proportions. Higher number of osteoid lines (18.05 ± 10.06 in group 1 vs. 9.01 ± 7.53 in group 2; P = 0.023) and higher cellularity, particularly regarding the number of osteocytes (631.85 ± 607.98 in group 1 vs. 219.08 ± 103.26 in group 2; P = 0.002), were observed in specimens from group 1. Differences in expression patterns of osteopontin and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase were also detected between groups.
CONCLUSION: AB to ABB ratio appears to influence bone remodeling patterns and cell content following maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. Similar proportion of vital bone was found in specimens obtained from both groups. More cellular presence was observed in samples containing higher proportions of AB.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21244500     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02073.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  9 in total

Review 1.  Relative performance of various biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bálint Trimmel; Noémi Gede; Péter Hegyi; Zsolt Szakács; Gyöngyi Anna Mezey; Eszter Varga; Márton Kivovics; Lilla Hanák; Zoltán Rumbus; György Szabó
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 2.  Clinical Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Novel Supportive Therapies for Oral Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Miguel Padial-Molina; Francisco O'Valle; Alejandro Lanis; Francisco Mesa; David M Dohan Ehrenfest; Hom-Lay Wang; Pablo Galindo-Moreno
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Immunohistochemial study on the expression of von Willebrand factor (vWF) after onlay autogenous iliac grafts for lateral alveolar ridge augmentation.

Authors:  Steffen Koerdt; Joerg Siebers; Wilhelm Bloch; Oliver Ristow; Alexander C Kuebler; Tobias Reuther
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  The Effect of Alendronate on Various Graft Materials Used in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Rabbit Study.

Authors:  Ferhat Ayranci; Metin Gungormus; Mehmet Melih Omezli; Betul Gundogdu
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-12-27       Impact factor: 0.611

5.  Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study.

Authors:  Claudio Stacchi; Antonio Rapani; Teresa Lombardi; Fabio Bernardello; Vanessa Nicolin; Federico Berton
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 5.021

6.  Maxillary sinus floor augmentation comparing bovine versus porcine bone xenografts mixed with autogenous bone graft. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Dario Abril-García; Ana Belen Carrillo-Galvez; Federico Zurita; Natividad Martín-Morales; Francisco O'Valle; Miguel Padial-Molina
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.021

Review 7.  Bone Regeneration from PLGA Micro-Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Inmaculada Ortega-Oller; Miguel Padial-Molina; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Francisco O'Valle; Ana Belén Jódar-Reyes; Jose Manuel Peula-García
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  A Preshaped Titanium Mesh for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Equine-Derived Bone Graft in a Posterior Mandibular Bone Defect: A Case Report.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Gianbattista Greco; Enrico Gherlone
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-01

9.  Bone Formation in Grafts with Bio-Oss and Autogenous Bone at Different Proportions in Rabbit Calvaria.

Authors:  Yeon Jung Kim; Carlos Eduardo Takeshi Saiki; Karoline Silva; Carlos Kiyoshi Moreira Massuda; Ana Paula de Souza Faloni; Paulo Henrique Braz-Silva; Debora Pallos; Wilson Roberto Sendyk
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-02-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.