BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: β-Adrenoceptor stimulation causes pronounced vasodilatation associated with smooth muscle hyperpolarization. Although the hyperpolarization is known to reflect K(ATP) channel activation, it is not known to what extent it contributes to vasodilatation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Smooth muscle membrane potential and tension were measured simultaneously in small mesenteric arteries in a wire myograph. The spread of vasodilatation over distance was assessed in pressurized arteries following localized intraluminal perfusion of either isoprenaline, adrenaline or noradrenaline. KEY RESULTS: Isoprenaline stimulated rapid smooth muscle relaxation associated at higher concentrations with robust hyperpolarization. Noradrenaline or adrenaline evoked a similar hyperpolarization to isoprenaline if the α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin was present. With each agonist, glibenclamide blocked hyperpolarization without reducing relaxation. Focal, intraluminal application of isoprenaline, noradrenaline or adrenaline during block of α(1)-adrenoceptors evoked a dilatation that spread along the entire length of the isolated artery. This response was endothelium-dependent and inhibited by glibenclamide. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Hyperpolarization is not essential for β-adrenoceptor-mediated vasodilatation. However, following focal β-adrenoceptor stimulation, this hyperpolarization underlies the ability of vasodilatation to spread along the artery wall. The consequent spread of vasodilatation is dependent upon the endothelium and likely to be of physiological relevance in the coordination of tissue blood flow.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: β-Adrenoceptor stimulation causes pronounced vasodilatation associated with smooth muscle hyperpolarization. Although the hyperpolarization is known to reflect K(ATP) channel activation, it is not known to what extent it contributes to vasodilatation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Smooth muscle membrane potential and tension were measured simultaneously in small mesenteric arteries in a wire myograph. The spread of vasodilatation over distance was assessed in pressurized arteries following localized intraluminal perfusion of either isoprenaline, adrenaline or noradrenaline. KEY RESULTS:Isoprenaline stimulated rapid smooth muscle relaxation associated at higher concentrations with robust hyperpolarization. Noradrenaline or adrenaline evoked a similar hyperpolarization to isoprenaline if the α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin was present. With each agonist, glibenclamide blocked hyperpolarization without reducing relaxation. Focal, intraluminal application of isoprenaline, noradrenaline or adrenaline during block of α(1)-adrenoceptors evoked a dilatation that spread along the entire length of the isolated artery. This response was endothelium-dependent and inhibited by glibenclamide. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Hyperpolarization is not essential for β-adrenoceptor-mediated vasodilatation. However, following focal β-adrenoceptor stimulation, this hyperpolarization underlies the ability of vasodilatation to spread along the artery wall. The consequent spread of vasodilatation is dependent upon the endothelium and likely to be of physiological relevance in the coordination of tissue blood flow.
Authors: Ana M Briones; Craig J Daly; Francesc Jimenez-Altayo; Sonia Martinez-Revelles; Jose M Gonzalez; John C McGrath; Elisabet Vila Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Laura J Sampson; Lowri M Davies; Richard Barrett-Jolley; Nick B Standen; Caroline Dart Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2007-05-24 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Jacqueline Querino Alves; Laena Pernomian; Cássia Dias Silva; Mayara Santos Gomes; Ana Maria de Oliveira; Roberto Santana da Silva Journal: RSC Med Chem Date: 2020-02-27
Authors: N Flacco; V Segura; M Perez-Aso; S Estrada; J F Seller; F Jiménez-Altayó; M A Noguera; P D'Ocon; E Vila; M D Ivorra Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: M Schepelmann; P L Yarova; I Lopez-Fernandez; T S Davies; S C Brennan; P J Edwards; A Aggarwal; J Graça; K Rietdorf; V Matchkov; R A Fenton; W Chang; M Krssak; A Stewart; K J Broadley; D T Ward; S A Price; D H Edwards; P J Kemp; D Riccardi Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 4.249