Literature DB >> 21243973

Corneal biomechanics following epi-LASIK.

Denise S Ryan1, Charles D Coe, Robin S Howard, Jayson D Edwards, Kraig S Bower.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical changes following epi-LASIK.
METHODS: In this prospective study of 51 patients, corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichert Technologies) preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after epi-LASIK. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare changes over time (alpha=.05). Intraocular pressure was also measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry.
RESULTS: Corneal hysteresis decreased from 10.22±1.65 mmHg preoperatively to 8.17±1.25 mmHg at 1 month, 8.46±1.44 mmHg at 3 months, 8.63±1.31 mmHg at 6 months, and 8.53±1.49 mmHg at 12 months. Corneal resistance factor decreased from 10.01±1.80 mmHg preoperatively to 7.82±1.68, 8.03±1.85, 7.77±1.50, and 7.80±1.66 mmHg at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant change over time for both CH and CRF (P<.0005). All measures of IOP changed significantly over time (P<.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: Epi-LASIK resulted in a significant change in CH and CRF postoperatively. Although some recovery occurred over time, CH, CRF, and IOP did not revert to preoperative levels. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21243973     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20110112-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  8 in total

1.  Short-term effects of overnight orthokeratology on corneal epithelial permeability and biomechanical properties.

Authors:  Thao N Yeh; Harry M Green; Yixiu Zhou; Julie Pitts; Britney Kitamata-Wong; Sophia Lee; Shiyin L Wang; Meng C Lin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Tonometry by Ocular Response Analyzer in Keratoconic and Warpage Eyes in Comparison with Normal Eyes.

Authors:  Fateme Alipour; Narges Hassanpoor; Moggan Letafatnejad; Amir-Hooshang Beheshtnejad; Seyed-Farzad Mohammadi
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-05

3.  In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties with Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology in Chinese Population.

Authors:  Ying Wu; Lei Tian; Yi-Fei Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Study on change in corneal biomechanics and effect of percent tissue altered in myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Murugesan Vanathi; Suresh Azimeera; Noopur Gupta; Radhika Tandon
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Time-varying regularity of changes in biomechanical properties of the corneas after removal of anterior corneal tissue.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Xiao Qin; Haixia Zhang; Lin Li
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 6.  Corneal biomechanical properties in different ocular conditions and new measurement techniques.

Authors:  Nery Garcia-Porta; Paulo Fernandes; Antonio Queiros; Jose Salgado-Borges; Manuel Parafita-Mato; Jose Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-04

7.  Corneal Biomechanical Findings in Contact Lens Induced Corneal Warpage.

Authors:  Fateme Alipour; Mojgan Letafatnejad; Amir Hooshang Beheshtnejad; Seyed-Farzad Mohammadi; Seyed Reza Ghaffary; Narges Hassanpoor; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  The effect of flap thickness on corneal biomechanics after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using the M-2 microkeratome.

Authors:  Iyad A Goussous; Mohamed-Sameh El-Agha; Ahmed Awadein; Mohamed H Hosny; Alaa A Ghaith; Ahmed L Khattab
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.