AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate sensitivity of 67Ga imaging and 18F-FDG PET for sarcoidosis activity and their inter observer variability. METHODS: Thirty-four newly diagnosed, histologically proven sarcoidosis patients were analyzed prospectively. (67)Ga imaging and (18)F-FDG PET were performed, the presence of pulmonary and extra pulmonary lesions was evaluated and inter observer variability of both techniques was assessed. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity to detect active sarcoidosis was 88% for (67)Ga imaging and 97% for (18)F-FDG PET. Although these results were not significantly different, 18F-FDG PET detected more lesions in the mediastinum (P<0.05), hila (P<0.05), lymph nodes (P<0.001) and extra pulmonary regions in general (P<0.001). Inter observer agreement was poor to moderate for (67)Ga imaging (kappa 0.19-0.59) and good to very good for (18)F-FDG PET (kappa 0.65-1.00). CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET is more sensitive than (67)Ga imaging in the assessment of sarcoidosis activity with regard to the mediastinum, hila, lymph nodes and extra pulmonary lesions in general. Furthermore, (18)F-FDG PET demonstrates a very good inter observer agreement in contrast with (67)Ga imaging and (18)F-FDG PET is therefore the nuclear imaging technique of choice in sarcoidosis assessment.
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate sensitivity of 67Ga imaging and 18F-FDG PET for sarcoidosis activity and their inter observer variability. METHODS: Thirty-four newly diagnosed, histologically proven sarcoidosispatients were analyzed prospectively. (67)Ga imaging and (18)F-FDG PET were performed, the presence of pulmonary and extra pulmonary lesions was evaluated and inter observer variability of both techniques was assessed. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity to detect active sarcoidosis was 88% for (67)Ga imaging and 97% for (18)F-FDG PET. Although these results were not significantly different, 18F-FDG PET detected more lesions in the mediastinum (P<0.05), hila (P<0.05), lymph nodes (P<0.001) and extra pulmonary regions in general (P<0.001). Inter observer agreement was poor to moderate for (67)Ga imaging (kappa 0.19-0.59) and good to very good for (18)F-FDG PET (kappa 0.65-1.00). CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET is more sensitive than (67)Ga imaging in the assessment of sarcoidosis activity with regard to the mediastinum, hila, lymph nodes and extra pulmonary lesions in general. Furthermore, (18)F-FDG PET demonstrates a very good inter observer agreement in contrast with (67)Ga imaging and (18)F-FDG PET is therefore the nuclear imaging technique of choice in sarcoidosis assessment.
Authors: K O'Connell; L Williams; J Jones; D J H McCabe; D Murphy; R Killeen; N Tubridy; S O'Riordan; C McGuigan Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Rémy L M Mostard; Sander M J Van Kuijk; Johny A Verschakelen; Marinus J P G van Kroonenburgh; Patty J Nelemans; Petal A H M Wijnen; Marjolein Drent Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Andor W J M Glaudemans; Erik F J de Vries; Filippo Galli; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Riemer H J A Slart; Alberto Signore Journal: Clin Dev Immunol Date: 2013-08-21