Literature DB >> 21242877

Effect of sagittal alignment on kinematic changes and degree of disc degeneration in the lumbar spine: an analysis using positional MRI.

Gun Keorochana1, Cyrus E Taghavi, Kwang-Bok Lee, Jeong Hyun Yoo, Jen-Chung Liao, Zhiqiang Fei, Jeffrey C Wang.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis using positional MRI.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of total sagittal lordosis on spinal kinematics and degree of disc degeneration in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Changes in sagittal lordosis alter the load on the spine and may affect spinal mobility. There is increasing recognition of the clinical impact that sagittal alignment has on back pain, especially its possible role in accelerating adjacent segment degeneration after spinal fusion. However, its relationship to segmental mobility and degeneration of the lumbar spine has yet to be determined.
METHODS: Four hundred and thirty patients who had low back pain with or without leg pain (241 males and 189 females) with a mean age of 42.98 years (range, 16-85 years) were included. Total sagittal lordosis (T12-S1) was divided into three groups; Group A: Straight or Kyphosis (<20°, n = 84), Group B: Normal lordosis (20-50°, n = 294), and Group C: Hyperlordosis (>50°, n = 52). The degree of disc degeneration was graded using midsagittal T2-weighted MR images. Segmental mobility, including translational motion and angular variation, was measured using positional MRI. Their relationship with total segmental lordosis was identified.
RESULTS: When compared with group B, the segmental motion in group C tended to be lower at the border of lordosis and higher at the apex of lordosis, with a significant difference in angular motion at L2-L3. The contrary finding was identified in group A, which had a higher segmental motion at border segments and lower motion at apical segments of lordosis, with significant difference of translational motion at L3-L4 and angular motion at L1-L2. Apical segments contributed more, whereas border segments contributed less to the total angular mobility in more lordotic spines. The opposite was seen in more kyphotic spines. Disc degeneration tended to be greater at all levels in group C, and at L1-L2 and L5-S1 in group A.
CONCLUSION: Changes in sagittal alignment may lead to kinematic changes in the lumbar spine. This may subsequently influence load bearing and the distribution of disc degeneration at each level. Sagittal alignment, disc degeneration, and segmental mobility likely have a reciprocal influence on one another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21242877     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f4d212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  24 in total

Review 1.  Adjacent segment disease perspective and review of the literature.

Authors:  Fanor M Saavedra-Pozo; Renato A M Deusdara; Edward C Benzel
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

2.  The change of whole lumbar segmental motion according to the mobility of degenerated disc in the lower lumbar spine: a kinetic MRI study.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Scott D Daffner; Jeffrey C Wang; Barry C Davis; Ahmet Alanay; Jung Suk Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Effect of lordosis angle change after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion on sacrum angular displacement: a finite element study.

Authors:  Ningfang Mao; Jian Shi; Dawei He; Yang Xie; Yushu Bai; Xianzhao Wei; Zhicai Shi; Ming Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lumbosacral sagittal alignment in association to intervertebral disc diseases.

Authors:  Zohreh Habibi; Farid Maleki; Ali Tayebi Meybodi; Ali Mahdavi; Hooshang Saberi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-12-17

5.  Determinants of evolution of endplate and disc degeneration in the lumbar spine: a multifactorial perspective.

Authors:  Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Alexander P Hughes; Alexander Aichmair; Richard J Herzog; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Miao Yu et al. concerning "Is L5-S1 motion segment different from the rest? A radiographic kinematic assessment of 72 patients with chronic low back pain" by AB Sabnis et al. (Eur. Spine J; 27(5):1127-1135).

Authors:  Ashutosh B Sabnis; Uphar Chamoli; Ashish D Diwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The early stage adjacent disc degeneration after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic VCFs.

Authors:  Jun Qian; Huilin Yang; Juehua Jing; Hong Zhao; Li Ni; Dasheng Tian; Zhengfei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Thoracic and Lumbar Sagittal Spinal Curvature Adaptations between Elite Iranian Road and Speed Cyclists.

Authors:  Motahareh Hashem Boroojerdi; Abbas Rahimi; Mohammad Mohsen Roostayi; Saeed Moghaddam Talebian; Mohammad Yousefi; Edgar Shamounian; Mahmoud Norouzi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2021-06-01

9.  Development of a morphology-based modeling technique for tracking solid-body displacements: examining the reliability of a potential MRI-only approach for joint kinematics assessment.

Authors:  Niladri K Mahato; Stephane Montuelle; John Cotton; Susan Williams; James Thomas; Brian Clark
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  The Relation Between Sacral Angle and Vertical Angle of Sacral Curvature and Lumbar Disc Degeneration: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ahmad Ghasemi; Kaveh Haddadi; Mohammad Khoshakhlagh; Hamid Reza Ganjeh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.