Literature DB >> 21242875

Multilevel magnetic resonance imaging analysis of multifidus-longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine and potential clinical applications to Wiltse's paraspinal approach.

Daniel Kyle Palmer1, Jonathan L Allen, Paul A Williams, Ashley Elizabeth Voss, Vikram Jadhav, David S Wu, Wayne K Cheng.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based study.
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to develop Wiltse's paraspinal surgical approach by determining the precise anatomic locations of the intermuscular cleavage planes formed by the multifidus and longissimus muscles. The primary objective was to measure the distances between the midline and the intermuscular planes, bilaterally, on MRI scans at each of the five disc levels between L1 and S1. Secondary objectives included identifying the existence of any correlations between patient demographics and the measured outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In 1968, Wiltse described an approach to the spine using the natural cleavage plane of the multifidus and longissimus muscles as an entry to the posterior spinal elements. The small direct incisions lessened bleeding, tissue violation, and muscle retraction, which popularized Wiltse's approach among surgeons. A detailed description of the locations of the intermuscular cleavage planes at each lumbar disc level, however, is not available.
METHODS: MRI scans of 200 patients taken during routine care (2007-2009) were retrospectively reviewed to gather measurements of the distances from the intermuscular cleavage planes to the midline, bilaterally, at each disc level from L1 to S1. Age, sex, and BMI (body mass index) were obtained to determine correlations.
RESULTS: Mean measurements significantly differed between all disc levels. At L5-S1, the mean distance was 37.8 mm; at L4-L5, 28.4 mm; at L3-L4, 16.2 mm; at L2-L3, 10.4 mm; and at L1-L2, 7.9 mm. The mean female distances were significantly greater than males (2 mm) on both sides of L5-S1 only. No correlation was discovered between BMI, age, height (N = 50), or weight (N = 50) with respect to measured distances.
CONCLUSION: In the absence of any significant clinical correlation between patient demographics and the entry site in Wiltse's approach, the spine surgeon may use distances described in this paper to apply to a broad base of spine patients regardless of BMI, sex, or age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21242875     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f520e8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Minimally invasive double approach (anterior and posterior) to the lumbar spine in revision surgery.

Authors:  Roberto Bassani; Aldo Sinigaglia; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based anatomical study of the multifidus-longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Haijun Li; Lei Yang; Jinhua Chen; Hao Xie; Weizhong Tian; Xiaojian Cao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Novel indication for posterior dynamic stabilization: Correction of disc tilt after lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Wayne K Cheng; Daniel Kyle Palmer; Vikram Jadhav
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-06-01

4.  How to perform the Wiltse posterolateral spinal approach: Technical note.

Authors:  A Guiroy; A Sícoli; N Gonzalez Masanés; A Morales Ciancio; M Gagliardi; A Falavigna
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-02-14

Review 5.  Inconsistent descriptions of lumbar multifidus morphology: A scoping review.

Authors:  Anke Hofste; Remko Soer; Hermie J Hermens; Heiko Wagner; Frits G J Oosterveld; André P Wolff; Gerbrand J Groen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  CT and MRI Determination of Intermuscular Space within Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles at Different Intervertebral Disc Levels.

Authors:  Xuefei Deng; Youzhi Zhu; Shidong Wang; Yu Zhang; Hui Han; Dengquan Zheng; Zihai Ding; Kelvin K L Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.