OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of facial asymmetry required to trigger conscious perception in the observer in a simulated model of facial paralysis. METHODS: A model of unilateral facial paralysis was created using the face of a participant without facial paralysis. Digital morphing software was used to create progressive asymmetry of the brow, oral commissure, and combined brow and oral commissure based on the typical sequelae seen in facial paralysis. Volunteers naive to the goals of the study repeatedly were shown a series of photographs of faces without facial paralysis, with the manipulated image interspersed within the series. RESULTS: At least 3 mm of facial asymmetry of the oral commissure, brow, or both was required before participants detected the asymmetry. With longer display intervals, participants tended to detect a smaller degree of asymmetry. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study directed at determining the amount of facial asymmetry required to trigger conscious perception of patients' facial paralysis in the naive observer. The pilot data and the discussion herein provide insight into the processes of visual perception of facial asymmetry and may be useful to surgeons for patient counseling and in setting surgical goals.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of facial asymmetry required to trigger conscious perception in the observer in a simulated model of facial paralysis. METHODS: A model of unilateral facial paralysis was created using the face of a participant without facial paralysis. Digital morphing software was used to create progressive asymmetry of the brow, oral commissure, and combined brow and oral commissure based on the typical sequelae seen in facial paralysis. Volunteers naive to the goals of the study repeatedly were shown a series of photographs of faces without facial paralysis, with the manipulated image interspersed within the series. RESULTS: At least 3 mm of facial asymmetry of the oral commissure, brow, or both was required before participants detected the asymmetry. With longer display intervals, participants tended to detect a smaller degree of asymmetry. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study directed at determining the amount of facial asymmetry required to trigger conscious perception of patients' facial paralysis in the naive observer. The pilot data and the discussion herein provide insight into the processes of visual perception of facial asymmetry and may be useful to surgeons for patient counseling and in setting surgical goals.
Authors: Howard W Francis; Ira Papel; Ioan Lina; Wayne Koch; David Tunkel; Paul Fuchs; Sandra Lin; David Kennedy; Robert Ruben; Fred Linthicum; Bernard Marsh; Simon Best; John Carey; Andrew Lane; Patrick Byrne; Paul Flint; David W Eisele Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2015-08-22 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Marc H Hohman; Sang W Kim; Elizabeth S Heller; Alice Frigerio; James T Heaton; Tessa A Hadlock Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Samuel L Oyer; Jason Nellis; Lisa E Ishii; Kofi D Boahene; Patrick J Byrne Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Sang W Kim; Elizabeth S Heller; Marc H Hohman; Tessa A Hadlock; James T Heaton Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.611
Authors: Peiyi Su; Lisa E Ishii; Jason Nellis; Jacob Dey; Kristin L Bater; Patrick J Byrne; Kofi D O Boahene; Masaru Ishii Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 4.611
Authors: Peiyi Su; Lisa E Ishii; Andrew Joseph; Jason Nellis; Jacob Dey; Kristin Bater; Patrick J Byrne; Kofi D O Boahene; Masaru Ishii Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 4.611