Literature DB >> 21242035

Quantitative comparison of different purification and detection methods for Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.

Sirri Kar1, Sandra Gawlowska, Arwid Daugschies, Berit Bangoura.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum) is the causal agent of cryptosporidiosis in many animals, mainly cattle, and possesses a high zoonotic potential. It occurs worldwide and ubiquitously. Detection of C. parvum is mainly performed directly but purification of the oocysts is useful to increase sensitivity and to obtain oocyst material for further use. The study was designed to compare (a) three different direct diagnostic methods, namely modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining, carbol fuchsin staining and conventional PCR, and (b) three routine oocyst purification methods, in particular flotation with saturated sodium chloride solution, Sheather's sucrose solution and a Percoll(®) gradient. During comparison of purification methods, special regard was paid to the ability to separate morphologically intact oocysts from the morphologically degenerated fraction or viable from non-viable oocysts, respectively.
RESULTS: (a) DIAGNOSTIC
METHODS: Most effective in C. parvum oocysts detection in calf faeces was PCR; carbol fuchsin and modified Ziehl-Neelsen stainings achieved comparable results. (b) Purification methods: Oocyst flotation using sodium chloride solution showed to be superior to Percoll(®) gradient centrifugation and sugar flotation in terms of purification quality, recovery efficacy (yield) and reduction of the proportion of degenerated or non-viable oocysts.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21242035     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  7 in total

1.  Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst viability and behaviour of the residual body during the excystation process.

Authors:  Sirri Kar; Arwid Daugschies; Ayse Cakmak; Nadim Yilmazer; Katja Dittmar; Berit Bangoura
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Application of a qPCR assay with melting curve analysis for detection and differentiation of protozoan oocysts in human fecal samples from Dominican Republic.

Authors:  Laura F Lalonde; Julissa Reyes; Alvin A Gajadhar
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Comparison of nested PCR and microscopy for the detection of cryptosporidiosis in bovine calves.

Authors:  S A Bhat; M Dixit; P D Juyal; N K Singh
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2012-11-08

4.  Evaluation of propidium monoazide-based qPCR to detect viable oocysts of Toxoplasma gondii.

Authors:  Angélique Rousseau; Isabelle Villena; Aurélien Dumètre; Sandie Escotte-Binet; Loïc Favennec; Jitender P Dubey; Dominique Aubert; Stéphanie La Carbona
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Immunofluorescence assay and PCR analysis of cryptosporidium oocysts and species from human feacal specimens.

Authors:  Mehdi Vejdani; Rezaei Mansour; Yezdan Hamzavi; Sina Vejdani; Naser Nazeri; Ali Michaeli
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 0.747

6.  Genotyping Cryptosporidium andersoni in cattle in Shaanxi Province, Northwestern China.

Authors:  Guang-Hui Zhao; Wan-Xin Ren; Man Gao; Qing-Qing Bian; Bing Hu; Mei-Mei Cong; Qing Lin; Rong-Jun Wang; Meng Qi; Mao-Zhen Qi; Xing-Quan Zhu; Long-Xian Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Revisiting the reference genomes of human pathogenic Cryptosporidium species: reannotation of C. parvum Iowa and a new C. hominis reference.

Authors:  Juan P Isaza; Ana Luz Galván; Victor Polanco; Bernice Huang; Andrey V Matveyev; Myrna G Serrano; Patricio Manque; Gregory A Buck; Juan F Alzate
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.