Literature DB >> 21241920

Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps created by 3 femtosecond lasers and a microkeratome.

Hyunseok Ahn1, Jin-Kook Kim, Chang Kook Kim, Gyu Heon Han, Kyoung Yul Seo, Eung Kweon Kim, Tae-Im Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the thickness and side-cut angle of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flaps created by 1 of 3 femtosecond lasers or a microkeratome using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT).
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
DESIGN: Comparative case series.
METHODS: Flap creation for bilateral LASIK was performed using an IntraLase (femtosecond group 1), VisuMax (femtosecond group 2), or Femto LDV (femtosecond group 3) femtosecond laser or an M2 microkeratome. Flap thickness was determined at 14 points. The side-cut angle was measured in 4 directions at the margin interface. Measurements were taken 2 months postoperatively using an RTVue Fourier-domain OCT device and integrated software.
RESULTS: Femtosecond group 1 comprised 50 eyes; femtosecond group 2, 40 eyes; femtosecond group 3, 64 eyes; and the microkeratome group, 52 eyes. Eyes in femtosecond groups 1 and 2 had relatively even flap configuration. Flaps in femtosecond group 3 and the microkeratome group had a meniscus shape. Flaps in femtosecond group 1 had the least difference between the mean peripheral and the central flap thickness (P<.001). The greatest flap thickness predictability (measured versus intended thickness) was in femtosecond group 3 (P<.001). Flaps in femtosecond group 1 had a side-cut angle closest to 90 degrees (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Flap morphology differed according to the system used. The 3 femtosecond laser systems appeared to be superior to the microkeratome system generally. The 3 femtosecond laser systems also produced different flap configurations depending on their individual mechanisms.
Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21241920     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of biomechanical effects of small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis: finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Abhijit Sinha Roy; William J Dupps; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  [Evaluation and quality assurance of refractive surgery procedures by the German Ophthalmological Society and the Professional Association of German Ophthalmologists. Status: May 2011].

Authors:  T Kohnen; T Neuhann; M Knorz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  High-Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography as an Adjunctive Tool in the Diagnosis of Corneal and Conjunctival Pathology.

Authors:  Afshan A Nanji; Fouad E Sayyad; Anat Galor; Sander Dubovy; Carol L Karp
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Flap thickness in eyes with ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  J Bradley Randleman; Carolyn B Hebson; Paul M Larson
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Analysis of microkeratome thin flap architecture using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Karolinne Maia Rocha; J Bradley Randleman; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Comparison of visual performance recovery after thin-flap LASIK with 4 femtosecond lasers.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yue-Hua Zhou; Yan Zheng; Qian Liu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Cornea lenticule viability and structural integrity after refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx) and cryopreservation.

Authors:  Karim Mohamed-Noriega; Kah-Peng Toh; Rebekah Poh; Deepashree Balehosur; Andri Riau; Hla M Htoon; Gary S L Peh; Shyam S Chaurasia; Donald T Tan; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.367

8.  Myopic LASIK Outcomes: Comparison of Three Different Femtosecond Lasers and a Mechanical Microkeratome Using the Same Excimer Laser.

Authors:  Juan Gros-Otero; Isabel Rodríguez-Pérez; Miguel A Teus; Andreas Katsanos; Dimitrios G Mikropoulos; Montserrat García-González
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-03-09

9.  Three-dimensional LASIK flap thickness variability: topographic central, paracentral and peripheral assessment, in flaps created by a mechanical microkeratome (M2) and two different femtosecond lasers (FS60 and FS200).

Authors:  A John Kanellopoulos; George Asimellis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-03

10.  Comparison of DLK incidence after laser in situ keratomileusis associated with two femtosecond lasers: Femto LDV and IntraLase FS60.

Authors:  Minoru Tomita; Yuko Sotoyama; Satoshi Yukawa; Tadayuki Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.