Literature DB >> 21241899

When should we biopsy a solitary central cartilaginous tumor of long bones? Literature review and management proposal.

Caroline Parlier-Cuau1, Valerie Bousson, Christian M Ogilvie, Richard D Lackman, Jean-Denis Laredo.   

Abstract

Differentiation between benign and low-grade malignant cartilaginous tumors is a radiological and pathological challenge. Based on a literature review, we propose the following guidelines for the management of a solitary central cartilaginous tumor of long bones distinguishing three situations: 1. The tumor is considered to be aggressive and requires surgery if one of the following criteria is present: cortical destruction, Moth-eaten or permeative osteolysis, spontaneous pathologic fracture, periosteal reaction, edema surrounding the tumor on MR images, and soft tissue mass. Tumor biopsy followed by complete intralesional treatment is indicated. 2. The tumor is classified as active if two of the following active criteria are present: pain related to the tumor, endosteal scalloping superior to two-thirds of the cortical thickness, extent of endosteal scalloping superior to two-thirds of the lesion length, cortical thickening and enlargement of the medullary cavity. Tumor biopsy or excision is indicated. 3. The tumor is classified as possibly active if one of the previous active criteria is present. In such cases, bone scintigraphy and dynamic-enhanced MR imaging should be obtained. Radionuclide uptake superior to the anterior iliac crest at bone scintigraphy and early and exponential enhancement at dynamic-enhanced MR are considered as two additional active criteria. After these two examinations, if only one criterion is still present, the lesion can be regarded as possibly quiescent, and the following monitoring is suggested: first follow-up at three to six months and then once a year. Otherwise, if two or more active criteria are present, biopsy is recommended. 4. The tumor is considered quiescent and does not require surgery if no active or aggressive criterion is present. A radiological follow-up can be proposed.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21241899     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Incidental findings in musculoskeletal radiology].

Authors:  F Wünnemann; C Rehnitz; M-A Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Risk factors for local recurrence from atypical cartilaginous tumour and enchondroma of the long bones.

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Shinji Tsukamoto; Giovanni Ciani; Manabu Akahane; Luca Cevolani; Piergiuseppe Tanzi; Akira Kido; Kanya Honoki; Yasuhito Tanaka; Davide Maria Donati
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-13

3.  Diagnostic value of MRI-based 3D texture analysis for tissue characterisation and discrimination of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Catharina S Lisson; Christoph G Lisson; Kerstin Flosdorf; Regine Mayer-Steinacker; Markus Schultheiss; Alexandra von Baer; Thomas F E Barth; Ambros J Beer; Matthias Baumhauer; Reinhard Meier; Meinrad Beer; Stefan A Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Radiographic Enchondroma Surveillance: Assessing Clinical Outcomes and Costs Effectiveness.

Authors:  Craig C Akoh; Ethan Craig; Alexander M Troester; Benjamin J Miller
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

5.  Solitary bone tumor imaging reporting and data system (BTI-RADS): initial assessment of a systematic imaging evaluation and comprehensive reporting method.

Authors:  Guilherme Jaquet Ribeiro; Romain Gillet; Gabriela Hossu; Jean-Michel Trinh; Eve Euxibie; François Sirveaux; Alain Blum; Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Differential diagnosis and treatment of enchondromas and atypical cartilaginous tumours of the pelvis: analysis of 21 patients.

Authors:  Patricio A Alfaro; Giovanni Ciani; Carlos A Herrera; Davide Maria Donati; Costantino Errani
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-09

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging follow-up of chondroid tumors: regression vs. progression.

Authors:  Bo Mi Chung; Sung Hwan Hong; Hye Jin Yoo; Ja-Young Choi; Hee-Dong Chae; Dong Hyun Kim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The changing face of central chondrosarcoma of bone. One UK-based orthopaedic oncology unit's experience of 33 years referrals.

Authors:  A Mark Davies; Anish Patel; Rajesh Botchu; Christine Azzopardi; Steven James; Lee Jeys
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-02-27

9.  Solitary bone lesions: which ones to worry about?

Authors:  Daniel Vanel; Eugenio Rimondi; Maia Vanel; Marco Gambarotti; Marco Alberghini
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Prevalence of cartilaginous tumours as an incidental finding on MRI of the knee.

Authors:  Wouter Stomp; Monique Reijnierse; Margreet Kloppenburg; Renée de Mutsert; Judith V M G Bovée; Martin den Heijer; Johan L Bloem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.