Literature DB >> 21241750

Tuning core vs. shell dimensions to adjust the performance of nanoscopic containers for the loading and release of doxorubicin.

Lily Yun Lin1, Nam S Lee, Jiahua Zhu, Andreas M Nyström, Darrin J Pochan, Richard B Dorshow, Karen L Wooley.   

Abstract

Detailed studies were performed to probe the effects of the core and shell dimensions of amphiphilic, shell crosslinked, knedel-like polymer nanoparticles (SCKs) on the loading and release of doxorubicin (DOX), a widely-used chemotherapy agent, in aqueous buffer, as a function of the solution pH. Effects of the nanoparticle composition were held constant, by employing SCKs constructed from a single type of amphiphilic diblock copolymer, poly(acrylic acid)-b-polystyrene (PAA-b-PS). A series of four SCK nanoparticle samples, ranging in number-average hydrodynamic diameter from 14-30 nm, was prepared from four block copolymers having different relative block lengths and absolute degrees of polymerization. The ratios of acrylic acid to styrene block lengths ranged from 0.65 to 3.0, giving SCKs with ratios of shell to core volumes ranging from 0.44 to 2.1. Although the shell thicknesses were calculated to be similar (1.5-3.1 nm by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) calculations and 3.5-4.9 nm by small angle neutron scattering (SANS) analyses), two of the SCK nanoparticles had relatively large core diameters (19±2 and 20±2 nm by TEM; 17.4 and 15.3 nm by SANS), while two had similar, smaller core diameters (11±2 and 13±2 nm by TEM; 9.0 and 8.9 nm by SANS). The SCKs were capable of being loaded with 1500-9700 DOX molecules per each particle, with larger numbers of DOX molecules packaged within the larger core SCKs. Their shell-to-core volume ratio showed impact on the rates and extents of release of DOX, with the volume occupied by the poly(acrylic acid) shell relative to the volume occupied by the polystyrene core correlating inversely with the diffusion-based release of DOX. Given that the same amount of polymer was used to construct each SCK sample, SCKs having smaller cores and higher acrylic acid vs. styrene volume ratios were present at higher concentrations than were the larger core SCKs, and gave lower final extents of release., Higher final extents of release and faster rates of release were observed for all DOX-loaded particle samples at pH 5.0 vs. pH 7.4, respectively, ca. 60% vs. 40% at 60 h, suggesting promise for enhanced delivery within tumors and cells. By fitting the data to the Higuchi model, quantitative determination of the kinetics of release was made, giving rate constants ranging from 0.0431 to 0.0540 h⁻¹/² at pH 7.4 and 0.106 to 0.136 h⁻¹/² at pH 5.0. In comparison, the non-crosslinked polymer micelle analogs exhibited rate constants for release of DOX of 0.245 and 0.278 h⁻¹/² at pH 7.4 and 5.0, respectively. These studies point to future directions to craft sophisticated devices for controlled drug release.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21241750      PMCID: PMC3119510          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  38 in total

Review 1.  New methods of drug delivery.

Authors:  R Langer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Active loading and tunable release of doxorubicin from block copolymer vesicles.

Authors:  Amira Choucair; Patrick Lim Soo; Adi Eisenberg
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 3.  Cross-linked block copolymer micelles: functional nanostructures of great potential and versatility.

Authors:  Rachel K O'Reilly; Craig J Hawker; Karen L Wooley
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  Oxidative coupling of peptides to a virus capsid containing unnatural amino acids.

Authors:  Zachary M Carrico; Dante W Romanini; Ryan A Mehl; Matthew B Francis
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Dual-surface modification of the tobacco mosaic virus.

Authors:  Tara L Schlick; Zhebo Ding; Ernest W Kovacs; Matthew B Francis
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 6.  Pluronic block copolymers for overcoming drug resistance in cancer.

Authors:  Alexander V Kabanov; Elena V Batrakova; Valery Yu Alakhov
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 7.  Controlled drug delivery by biodegradable poly(ester) devices: different preparative approaches.

Authors:  R Jain; N H Shah; A W Malick; C T Rhodes
Journal:  Drug Dev Ind Pharm       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Folic acid-mediated targeting of cowpea mosaic virus particles to tumor cells.

Authors:  Giuseppe Destito; Robert Yeh; Chris S Rae; M G Finn; Marianne Manchester
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2007-10

Review 9.  Amphiphilic block copolymers for drug delivery.

Authors:  Monica L Adams; Afsaneh Lavasanifar; Glen S Kwon
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  Interior surface modification of bacteriophage MS2.

Authors:  Jacob M Hooker; Ernest W Kovacs; Matthew B Francis
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  22 in total

1.  Dual peptide nucleic acid- and peptide-functionalized shell cross-linked nanoparticles designed to target mRNA toward the diagnosis and treatment of acute lung injury.

Authors:  Ritu Shrestha; Yuefei Shen; Kevin A Pollack; John-Stephen A Taylor; Karen L Wooley
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 2.  Polymeric Nanostructures for Imaging and Therapy.

Authors:  Mahmoud Elsabahy; Gyu Seong Heo; Soon-Mi Lim; Guorong Sun; Karen L Wooley
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Synthetic polymer nanoparticles conjugated with FimH(A) from E. coli pili to emulate the bacterial mode of epithelial internalization.

Authors:  Lily Yun Lin; Kristin M Tiemann; Yali Li; Jerome S Pinkner; Jennifer N Walker; Scott J Hultgren; David A Hunstad; Karen L Wooley
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Orthogonally dual-clickable Janus nanoparticles via a cyclic templating strategy.

Authors:  Shiyi Zhang; Zhou Li; Sandani Samarajeewa; Guorong Sun; Chao Yang; Karen L Wooley
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Evaluation of doxorubicin-loaded 3-helix micelles as nanocarriers.

Authors:  Nikhil Dube; Jessica Y Shu; He Dong; Jai W Seo; Elizabeth Ingham; Azadeh Kheirolomoom; Pin-Yuan Chen; John Forsayeth; Krystof Bankiewicz; Katherine W Ferrara; Ting Xu
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 6.988

6.  Differential immunotoxicities of poly(ethylene glycol)- vs. poly(carboxybetaine)-coated nanoparticles.

Authors:  Mahmoud Elsabahy; Ang Li; Fuwu Zhang; Deborah Sultan; Yongjian Liu; Karen L Wooley
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Micelle Delivery of Parthenolide to Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells.

Authors:  Michael P Baranello; Louisa Bauer; Craig T Jordan; Danielle S W Benoit
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.321

8.  Functional block copolymer nanoparticles: toward the next generation of delivery vehicles.

Authors:  Maxwell J Robb; Luke A Connal; Bongjae F Lee; Nathaniel A Lynd; Craig J Hawker
Journal:  Polym Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.582

9.  Chitosan-based polyelectrolyte complexes as potential nanoparticulate carriers: physicochemical and biological characterization.

Authors:  Thiruganesh Ramasamy; Tuan Hiep Tran; Hyuk Jun Cho; Jeong Hwan Kim; Yong Il Kim; Jae Yoon Jeon; Han-Gon Choi; Chul Soon Yong; Jong Oh Kim
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Synthesis and in vivo pharmacokinetic evaluation of degradable shell cross-linked polymer nanoparticles with poly(carboxybetaine) versus poly(ethylene glycol) surface-grafted coatings.

Authors:  Ang Li; Hannah P Luehmann; Guorong Sun; Sandani Samarajeewa; Jiong Zou; Shiyi Zhang; Fuwu Zhang; Michael J Welch; Yongjian Liu; Karen L Wooley
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.