Literature DB >> 21241703

Responses of Drosophila melanogaster to atypical oxygen atmospheres.

Dimitri A Skandalis1, Jeffrey A Stuart, Glenn J Tattersall.   

Abstract

We examined physiological phenotypes of Drosophila melanogaster in hypoxic to hyperoxic atmospheres. We performed measurements on life span or behavioural function in 5, 21, 40, 60, and 80% O(2), and combined this with literature data for 2% and 100% O(2). O(2) incubation resulted in a concentration-dependent reduction of life span in both hypoxia and hyperoxia, though different measures of life span were affected differently. We also examined how behavioural and metabolic functions were affected by exposure to hyperoxia (up to 60% O(2)). Climbing behaviour was measured as a fast (4 s) and slow (55 s) response in a negative geotaxis assay. In normoxia, both measures of climbing response declined exponentially until disappearing completely. Interestingly, survivorship was very high until the loss of climbing ability, after which it dropped rapidly. This pattern appeared accelerated in 40% O(2). However, while flies in 60% O(2) also apparently lost their fast climbing ability immediately prior to the drop in survivorship, they maintained considerable climbing ability over the longer trial. Metabolism, measured by CO(2) release, did not change with age in normoxic flies, but was significantly lower in flies exposed to hyperoxia, particularly as the flies aged. There was, however, a slight increase in water loss rate with age in normoxia, while in hyperoxia, water loss was reduced. Uniquely, the water loss rates of flies in 60% O(2) doubled immediately prior to the end of their life span. Because ageing results in generally irreversible functional declines, we examined if functional declines in hyperoxia (60% O(2)) were also irreversible, or whether some functioning could recover after a return to normoxia. After 7 days of recovery, water loss rates decreased, CO(2) exhalation slightly increased, and climbing ability was partially recovered. Therefore, the effect of O(2) on D. melanogaster function is non-linear, may be reversible, and may include unique phenotypes that arise at some O(2) concentrations, and not others.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21241703     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1910            Impact factor:   2.354


  4 in total

1.  Drosophila development, physiology, behavior, and lifespan are influenced by altered dietary composition.

Authors:  Kiel G Ormerod; Olivia K LePine; Prabhodh S Abbineni; Justin M Bridgeman; Jens R Coorssen; A Joffre Mercier; Glenn J Tattersall
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.160

2.  Lifespan and ROS levels in different Drosophila melanogaster strains after 24 h hypoxia exposure.

Authors:  Sandro Malacrida; Federica De Lazzari; Simona Mrakic-Sposta; Alessandra Vezzoli; Mauro A Zordan; Marco Bisaglia; Giulio Maria Menti; Nicola Meda; Giovanni Frighetto; Gerardo Bosco; Tomas Dal Cappello; Giacomo Strapazzon; Carlo Reggiani; Maristella Gussoni; Aram Megighian
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.643

3.  Iron Sulfur and Molybdenum Cofactor Enzymes Regulate the Drosophila Life Cycle by Controlling Cell Metabolism.

Authors:  Zvonimir Marelja; Silke Leimkühler; Fanis Missirlis
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Metabolic rate and hypoxia tolerance are affected by group interactions and sex in the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster): new data and a literature survey.

Authors:  Warren Burggren; BriAnna M Souder; Dao H Ho
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 2.422

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.