| Literature DB >> 21241482 |
K Ranil D De Silva1, Rukmal Silva, Dhammika Amaratunga, W S L Gunasekera, Rohan W Jayesekera.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The variations of the circle of Willis (CW) are clinically important as patients with effective collateral circulations have a lower risk of transient ischemic attack and stroke than those with ineffective collaterals. The aim of the present cadaveric study was to investigate the anatomical variations of the CW and to compare the frequency of prevalence of the different variations with previous autopsy studies as variations in the anatomy of the CW as a whole have not been studied in the Indian subcontinent.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21241482 PMCID: PMC3224135 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Figure 1(Type 1) - "Typical CW".
Figure 2(Type 6) - Bilateral hypoplastic PcoA.
Comparison of the variations of the CW
| Author | Present study | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country | USA (1) | Morocco | USA (2) | France | Iran | Sri Lanka | |
| Total brains | 994 | 100 | 414 | 200 | 102b | 225 | |
| Types | Configuration | ||||||
| 1 | Typical | 192(19) | 18(18) | 20(5) | 29(14.5) | 29(28) | 32(14) |
| 2 | all segments hypoplastic | 54(5) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 10(5) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| 3 | hypoplastic AcoA | 91(9) | 11(11) | 6(1) | 9(4.5) | 0(0) | 32(14) |
| 4 | Unilateral hypoplastic PcoA | 88(9) | 14(14) | 24(6) | 28(14) | 20(20) | 26(11.5) |
| 5 | Unilateral hypoplastic PcoA and AcoA | 41(4) | 6(6) | 12(3) | 10(5) | 4(4) | 15(7) |
| 6 | Bilateral hypoplastic PcoAs; | 126(13) | 24(24) | 131(32) | 44(22) | 28(27) | 52(23) |
| 7 | Bilateral hypoplastic PcoAs and hypoplastic AcoA | 67(7) | 10(10) | 58(14) | 34(17) | 4(4) | 37(16) |
| 8 | hypoplastic A1 | 38(5) | 2(2) | 0(0) | 3(1.5) | 0(0) | 6 (3) |
| 9 | Unilateral hypoplastic P1 | 47(5) | 3(3) | 4(0.9) | 5(2.5) | 1(0.9) | 2(0.8) |
| 10 | Bilateral hypoplastic P1s | 33(3) | 1(1) | 16(4) | 6(3) | 0(0) | 1(0.4) |
| 11 | hypoplastic P1 and contralateral A1 | 2(0.2) | 0(0) | 10(2) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| 12 | hypoplastic P1 and ipsilateral A1 | 20(2) | 1(1) | 1(0.2) | 3(1.5) | 1(0.9) | 4 (2) |
| 13 | Bilateral hypoplastic P1s and A1 | 5(0.5) | 0(0) | 3(0.7) | 1(0.5) | 0(0) | 1(0.4) |
| 14 | hypoplastic A1 and contralateral PcoA | 7(0.7) | 0(0) | 1(0.2) | 1(0.5) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| 15 | Hypoplastic AcoA and P1 | 35(3.5) | 4(4) | 0(0) | 4(2) | 1(0.9) | 6(3) |
| 16 | hypoplastic PcoA, ipsilateral A1 and AcoA | 16(2) | 3(3) | 2(0.4) | 2(1) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| 17 | hypoplastic PcoA and contralateral P1 | 26(3) | 0(0) | 46(11) | 3(1.5) | 2(2) | 1(0.4) |
| 18 | A1 and bilateral hypoplastic PcoAs | 58(6) | 0(0) | 21(5.0) | 6(3) | 0(0) | 4(2) |
| 19 | hypoplastic PcoA, AcoA and contralateral P1 | 17(2) | 1(1) | 28(7) | 1(0.5) | 1(0.9) | 0(0) |
| 20 | hypoplastic P1, contralateral PcoA and ipsilateral A1 | 10(1) | 1(1) | 5(1) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| 21 | Bilateral hypoplastic P1s and AcoA | 13(1) | 0(0) | 10(2) | 1(0.5) | 0(0) | 1(0.4) |
| 22 | hypoplastic PcoA, ipsilateral A1 and contralateral P1 | 3(0.3) | 0(0) | 8(2) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| Others | 5(0.5) | 1(1) | 8(2) | 0(0) | 1(0.9) | 5(2) |
(a) Column percentages are given in parentheses. (b) Eftekhar et al. 2006[19] report the total in their study as 102 but findings are reported only for 92.
Results of the pairwise chi-squared tests (performed as exact tests)
| Study | Morocco | USA2 | France | Iran | Sri Lanka |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA1 | 0.6902 | <0.0001* | 0.0013* | 0.0003* | <0.0001* |
| Morocco | <0.0001* | 1.0000 | 0.0521 | 1.0000 | |
| USA2 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | ||
| France | 0.0054* | 0.0115* | |||
| Iran | <0.0001* |
The values shown are Bonferroni adjusted p-values. All values significant at the 5% level are shown with an asterisk.
Figure 3Correspondence analysis plot of the data in Table 1. The plot is a 2-dimensional representation of the 23-dimensional Countries data (the 6 filled circles) together with a 2-dimensional representation of the 6-dimensional Configuration Types data (the 23 unfilled circles). One notable observation is that USA2 separates from the rest of the Countries; since the separation is in the same direction as the deviation of Configuration Types numbered (in order from right to left) 11, 22, 17 and 19 from the center of the plot, these are the Configuration Types most associated with this separation; the proportions contributing to the separation can be read off from Table 1.