OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of venous leg ulcers on health-related quality of life and analyse the quality of life instruments that have been used for this topic. BACKGROUND: Venous leg ulcers represent more than 80% of all chronic leg ulcers. Several studies have demonstrated that health-related quality of life is affected in patients with such lesions. METHOD: An integrative review was conducted, together with an additional methodological review of quality of life instruments. Eight electronic databases were searched, and all studies published between 2003 and 2008 were considered in with both qualitative and quantitative approaches and in Spanish, English, French, German and Portuguese. Thus, no restrictions were applied as regards study design. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included; one used mixed methods, three employed qualitative methods and the remaining articles used a quantitative approach. Pain was the factor most frequently identified as affecting health-related quality of life. The generic instruments most commonly used were Short Form-36 and adaptations, the Nottingham Health Profile and EuroQol-5, whilst the disease-specific tools were Hyland, Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule and Charing Cross Venous Leg Ulcer Questionnaire. Two new instruments were also identified, venous leg ulcer quality of life and Sheffield Preference-based Venous Leg Ulcer 5D. CONCLUSIONS: The negative impact of venous leg ulcers on health-related quality of life is confirmed in this review. This impact has been measured using a variety of specific health-related quality of life instruments. However, the review findings suggest that the Charing Cross Venous Leg Ulcer Questionnaire is the most appropriate instrument due to its disease-specific psychometric characteristics.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of venous leg ulcers on health-related quality of life and analyse the quality of life instruments that have been used for this topic. BACKGROUND:Venous leg ulcers represent more than 80% of all chronic leg ulcers. Several studies have demonstrated that health-related quality of life is affected in patients with such lesions. METHOD: An integrative review was conducted, together with an additional methodological review of quality of life instruments. Eight electronic databases were searched, and all studies published between 2003 and 2008 were considered in with both qualitative and quantitative approaches and in Spanish, English, French, German and Portuguese. Thus, no restrictions were applied as regards study design. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included; one used mixed methods, three employed qualitative methods and the remaining articles used a quantitative approach. Pain was the factor most frequently identified as affecting health-related quality of life. The generic instruments most commonly used were Short Form-36 and adaptations, the Nottingham Health Profile and EuroQol-5, whilst the disease-specific tools were Hyland, Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule and Charing Cross Venous Leg Ulcer Questionnaire. Two new instruments were also identified, venous leg ulcer quality of life and Sheffield Preference-based Venous Leg Ulcer 5D. CONCLUSIONS: The negative impact of venous leg ulcers on health-related quality of life is confirmed in this review. This impact has been measured using a variety of specific health-related quality of life instruments. However, the review findings suggest that the Charing Cross Venous Leg Ulcer Questionnaire is the most appropriate instrument due to its disease-specific psychometric characteristics.
Authors: Miriam Berenguer Pérez; Pablo López-Casanova; Raquel Sarabia Lavín; Héctor González de la Torre; José Verdú-Soriano Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2018-11-04 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Alexander Gamus; Hanna Kaufman; Elad Keren; Gila Brandin; Daniel Peles; Gabriel Chodick Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Wilma M Hopman; Elizabeth G VanDenKerkhof; Meg E Carley; Janet L Kuhnke; Margaret B Harrison Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-01-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Mike Rüttermann; Andreas Maier-Hasselmann; Brigitte Nink-Grebe; Marion Burckhardt Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Bruno Emmanuel de Medeiros Pereira; Alana Tamar Oliveira de Sousa; Jael Rúbia Figueiredo de Sá França; Maria Júlia Guimarães Oliveira Soares Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2016 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.896