Literature DB >> 21241338

Innovation and evaluation: taming and unleashing telecare technology.

Jeannette Pols1, Dick Willems.   

Abstract

Telecare is advocated in most European countries with great, if not grandiose, promises: improving healthcare, lowering costs, solving workforce shortage. This paper does not so much question these specific promises, but rather the 'register of promising' as such, by comparing the promises with actual processes of incorporating technologies in healthcare practices. The case we study is the use of webcams in follow-up care from a Dutch rehabilitation clinic for people with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This process shows many changes and contingencies, and corresponding shifts in goals and aims. The conclusion is that when innovative technologies such as telecare are actually put to work, 'the same' technology will perform differently. In order to function at all, technology has to be tamed, it has to be tinkered with to fit the practices of the users. The technology, however, is not meekly put to use (tamed), but is unleashed as well, affecting care practices in unforeseen ways. The untenability of pre-given promises and the fluidity of locally evolving goals has important implications for the way in which innovations are promoted, as well as for the way innovative technologies may be evaluated.
© 2010 The Authors. Sociology of Health & Illness © 2010 Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness/Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21241338     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01293.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  16 in total

1.  Older people and rural eHealth: perceptions of caring relations and their effects on engagement in digital primary health care.

Authors:  Jens Lindberg; Robert Bhatt; Anton Ferm
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2021-01-14

Review 2.  Assessing the implementability of telehealth interventions for self-management support: a realist review.

Authors:  Ivaylo Vassilev; Alison Rowsell; Catherine Pope; Anne Kennedy; Alicia O'Cathain; Chris Salisbury; Anne Rogers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  The Contradictions of Telehealth User Experience in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Authors:  Lisa Brunton; Peter Bower; Caroline Sanders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The Personal Emergency Response System as a Technology Innovation in Primary Health Care Services: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Randi Stokke
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  "Maybe we should talk about it anyway": a qualitative study of understanding expectations and use of an established technology innovation in caring practices.

Authors:  Randi Stokke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Joseph Wherton; Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Jennifer Lynch; Gemma Hughes; Christine A'Court; Susan Hinder; Nick Fahy; Rob Procter; Sara Shaw
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  The Emergence and Unfolding of Telemonitoring Practices in Different Healthcare Organizations.

Authors:  Jannie Kristine Bang Christensen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  When self-tracking enters physical rehabilitation: From 'pushed' self-tracking to ongoing affective encounters in arrangements of care.

Authors:  Nete Schwennesen
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2017-08-30

9.  How does health feel? Towards research on the affective atmospheres of digital health.

Authors:  Deborah Lupton
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2017-04-10

10.  Discrepancies between Expected and Actual Implementation: The Process Evaluation of PERS Integration in Nursing Homes.

Authors:  Fangyuan Chang; Andrea Eriksson; Britt Östlund
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.