Literature DB >> 21241255

A simple scoring system for outcome prediction of ischemic stroke.

A Muscari1, G M Puddu, N Santoro, M Zoli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: According to most existing models, a computer is usually needed for predicting stroke outcome. Our purpose was to construct a simple and reliable prognostic scale not requiring the use of a calculating machine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The scale [the Bologna Outcome Algorithm for Stroke (BOAS)] was obtained in 221 patients with ischemic stroke not undergoing thrombolysis and was then validated in a test group of 100 different patients. Outcome was assessed at 9 months as the number of dependent or dead patients (modified Rankin scale - mRS > 2).
RESULTS: By a preliminary systematic univariate analysis, 25 of 415 baseline variables were found to be associated with a mRS > 2 independently of stroke severity and age. Subsequent multivariable analyses led to a final model based on five dichotomous risk factors (RF): National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥10, age ≥78, need of urinary catheter, oxygen administration, and persistence of upper limb paralysis at discharge from stroke unit. The patients with two or more RF (53%) had a mRS > 2 in 91% of cases and were dead in 42% of cases. With 0-1 RF, the two percentages were 24% and 2%, respectively (overall accuracy of prediction 83.9%, area under ROC curve [AUC] 0.891). In the test group, the accuracy was 79.0% and the AUC was 0.839.
CONCLUSIONS: The need of urinary catheter, oxygen administration, and persistence of upper limb paralysis, together with stroke severity and advanced age, allow a simple and accurate prediction of dependency or death after ischemic stroke.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21241255     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01479.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6314            Impact factor:   3.209


  12 in total

Review 1.  Imaging for prediction of functional outcome and assessment of recovery in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Chelsea S Kidwell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Evaluation of machine learning methods to stroke outcome prediction using a nationwide disease registry.

Authors:  Ching-Heng Lin; Kai-Cheng Hsu; Kory R Johnson; Yang C Fann; Chon-Haw Tsai; Yu Sun; Li-Ming Lien; Wei-Lun Chang; Po-Lin Chen; Cheng-Li Lin; Chung Y Hsu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  The Role of Imaging in Clinical Stroke Scales That Predict Functional Outcome: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fatima Soliman; Ajay Gupta; Diana Delgado; Hooman Kamel; Ankur Pandya
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2017-05-22

4.  GISCOME - Genetics of Ischaemic Stroke Functional Outcome network: A protocol for an international multicentre genetic association study.

Authors:  Jane M Maguire; Steve Bevan; Tara M Stanne; Erik Lorenzen; Israel Fernandez-Cadenas; Graeme J Hankey; Jordi Jimenez-Conde; Katarina Jood; Jin-Moo Lee; Robin Lemmens; Christopher Levi; Bo Norrving; Kristiina Rannikmae; Natalia Rost; Jonathan Rosand; Peter M Rothwell; Rodney Scott; Daniel Strbian; Jonathan Sturm; Cathie Sudlow; Matthew Traylor; Vincent Thijs; Turgut Tatlisumak; Tadeusz Wieloch; Daniel Woo; Bradford B Worrall; Christina Jern; Arne Lindgren
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2017-04-19

5.  The PLAN score can predict poor outcomes of intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Wanliang Du; Xingquan Zhao; Yilong Wang; Guitao Zhang; Jiming Fang; Yuesong Pan; Liping Liu; Kehui Dong; Gaifen Liu; Yongjun Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

6.  Optimizing acute stroke outcome prediction models: Comparison of generalized regression neural networks and logistic regressions.

Authors:  Sheng Qu; Mingchao Zhou; Shengxiu Jiao; Zeyu Zhang; Kaiwen Xue; Jianjun Long; Fubing Zha; Yuan Chen; Jiehui Li; Qingqing Yang; Yulong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of statistical and clinical predictions of functional outcome after ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Douglas D Thompson; Gordon D Murray; Cathie L M Sudlow; Martin Dennis; William N Whiteley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Web-based tool for dynamic functional outcome after acute ischemic stroke and comparison with existing models.

Authors:  Ruijun Ji; Wanliang Du; Haipeng Shen; Yuesong Pan; Penglian Wang; Gaifen Liu; Yilong Wang; Hao Li; Xingquan Zhao; Yongjun Wang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Prognostic significance of carotid and vertebral ultrasound in ischemic stroke patients.

Authors:  Antonio Muscari; Andrea Bonfiglioli; Donatella Magalotti; Giovanni M Puddu; Veronica Zorzi; Marco Zoli
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 10.  Clinical prediction models for mortality and functional outcome following ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marion Fahey; Elise Crayton; Charles Wolfe; Abdel Douiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.