Literature DB >> 21241037

Lessons learned from implementation of a computerized application for pending tests at hospital discharge.

Anuj K Dalal1, Eric G Poon, Andrew S Karson, Tejal K Gandhi, Christopher L Roy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients are often discharged from the hospital before test results are finalized. Awareness of these results is poor and therefore an important patient safety concern. Few computerized systems have been deployed at care transitions to address this problem. We describe an attempt to implement a computerized application to help inpatient physicians manage these test results.
METHODS: We modified an ambulatory electronic medical record (EMR)-based results management application to track pending tests at hospital discharge (Hospitalist Results Manager, HRM). We trained inpatient physicians at 2 academic medical centers to track these tests using this application. We surveyed inpatient physicians regarding usage of and satisfaction with the application, barriers to use, and the characteristics of an ideal system to track pending tests at discharge.
RESULTS: Of 29 survey respondents, 14 (48%) reported never using HRM, and 13 (45%) used it 1 to 2 times per week. A total of 23 (79%) reported barriers prohibiting use, including being inundated with clinically "irrelevant" results, not having sufficient time, and a lack of integration of post-discharge test result management into usual workflow. Twenty-one (72%) wanted to receive notification of abnormal and clinician-designated pending test results. Twenty-seven physicians (93%) agreed that an ideally designed computerized application would be valuable for managing pending tests at discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: Although inpatient physicians would highly value a computerized application to manage pending tests at discharge, the characteristics of an ideal system are unclear and there are important barriers prohibiting adoption and optimal usage of such systems. We outline suggestions for future electronic systems to manage pending tests at discharge.
Copyright © 2010 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21241037     DOI: 10.1002/jhm.794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.960


  19 in total

1.  Does integrating nonurgent, clinically significant radiology alerts within the electronic health record impact closed-loop communication and follow-up?

Authors:  Stacy D O'Connor; Anuj K Dalal; V Anik Sahni; Ronilda Lacson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Impact of automated alerts on follow-up of post-discharge microbiology results: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert El-Kareh; Christopher Roy; Deborah H Williams; Eric G Poon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Filling the black hole of hospital discharge (editorial in response to article by Walz et al.,J Gen Intern Med 2011).

Authors:  Robert M Wachter; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Using computerized provider order entry to enforce documentation of tests with pending results at hospital discharge.

Authors:  J Cadwallader; C Asirwa; X Li; J Kesterson; W M Tierney; M C Were
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Design and implementation of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge.

Authors:  Anuj K Dalal; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Eric G Poon; Deborah H Williams; Kathleen Rossi-Roh; Allison Macleay; Catherine L Liang; Nyryan Nolido; Jonas Budris; David W Bates; Christopher L Roy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Four-year impact of an alert notification system on closed-loop communication of critical test results.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Luciano M Prevedello; Katherine P Andriole; Stacy D O'Connor; Christopher Roy; Tejal Gandhi; Anuj K Dalal; Luke Sato; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Impact of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anuj K Dalal; Christopher L Roy; Eric G Poon; Deborah H Williams; Nyryan Nolido; Cathy Yoon; Jonas Budris; Tejal Gandhi; David W Bates; Jeffrey L Schnipper
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Pending studies at hospital discharge: a pre-post analysis of an electronic medical record tool to improve communication at hospital discharge.

Authors:  Molly A Kantor; Kambria H Evans; Lisa Shieh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Using tablet computers compared to interactive voice response to improve subject recruitment in osteoporosis pragmatic clinical trials: feasibility, satisfaction, and sample size.

Authors:  Amy S Mudano; Lisa C Gary; Ana L Oliveira; Mary Melton; Nicole C Wright; Jeffrey R Curtis; Elizabeth Delzell; T Michael Harrington; Meredith L Kilgore; Cora Elizabeth Lewis; Jasvinder A Singh; Amy H Warriner; Wilson D Pace; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Junhua Li; Amir Talaei-Khoei; Holly Seale; Pradeep Ray; C Raina Macintyre
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2013-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.