Literature DB >> 21240795

"Doctor, would you prescribe a pill to help me … ?" a national survey of physicians on using medicine for human enhancement.

Timothy D Hotze1, Kavita Shah, Emily E Anderson, Matthew K Wynia.   

Abstract

Using medical advances to enhance human athletic, aesthetic, and cognitive performance, rather than to treat disease, has been controversial. Little is known about physicians' experiences, views, and attitudes in this regard. We surveyed a national sample of physicians to determine how often they prescribe enhancements, their views on using medicine for enhancement, and whether they would be willing to prescribe a series of potential interventions that might be considered enhancements. We find that many physicians occasionally prescribe enhancements, but doctors hold nuanced and ambiguous views of these issues. Most express concerns about the potential effects of enhancements on social equity, yet many also believe specific enhancements that are safe and effective should be available but not covered by insurance. These apparently contradictory views might reflect inherent tensions between the values of equity and liberty, which could make crafting coherent social policies on medical enhancements challenging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21240795     DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2011.534957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  15 in total

1.  Cognitive-enhancing substance use at German universities: frequency, reasons and gender differences.

Authors:  Stefanie Mache; Patrick Eickenhorst; Karin Vitzthum; Burghard F Klapp; David A Groneberg
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2012-06-16

2.  Should physicians prescribe cognitive enhancers to healthy individuals?

Authors:  Cynthia Forlini; Serge Gauthier; Eric Racine
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Navigating the enhancement landscape. Ethical issues in research on cognitive enhancers for healthy individuals.

Authors:  Cynthia Forlini; Wayne Hall; Bruce Maxwell; Simon M Outram; Peter B Reiner; Dimitris Repantis; Maartje Schermer; Eric Racine
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  "The White Version of Cheating?" Ethical and Social Equity Concerns of Cognitive Enhancing Drug Users in Higher Education.

Authors:  Ross Aikins
Journal:  J Acad Ethics       Date:  2018-12-11

5.  Attitudes towards prescribing cognitive enhancers among primary care physicians in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas G Franke; Carolin Papenburg; Elena Schotten; Peter B Reiner; Klaus Lieb
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 6.  Attitudes toward pharmacological cognitive enhancement-a review.

Authors:  Kimberly J Schelle; Nadira Faulmüller; Lucius Caviola; Miles Hewstone
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-17

7.  Everyday drug diversions: a qualitative study of the illicit exchange and non-medical use of prescription stimulants on a university campus.

Authors:  Scott Vrecko
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Just How Cognitive Is "Cognitive Enhancement"? On the Significance of Emotions in University Students' Experiences with Study Drugs.

Authors:  Scott Vrecko
Journal:  AJOB Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-07

9.  Impact of contextual factors and substance characteristics on perspectives toward cognitive enhancement.

Authors:  Sebastian Sattler; Cynthia Forlini; Eric Racine; Carsten Sauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The rationale for consuming cognitive enhancement drugs in university students and teachers.

Authors:  Sebastian Sattler; Carsten Sauer; Guido Mehlkop; Peter Graeff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.