Laura Rees Willett1, G Craig Rosevear, Sarang Kim. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA. willetlr@umdnj.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Team-based learning is a large-group instructional modality intended to provide active learning with modest faculty resources. PURPOSE: The goal is to determine if team-based learning could be substituted for small-group learning in case sessions without compromising test performance or satisfaction. METHODS:One hundred and sixty-seven students were assigned to team-based or small-group learning for 6 case discussion sessions. Examination scores and student satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: Instruction modality had no meaningful effect on examination score, 81.7% team based versus 79.7% small-group, p=.56 after multivariate adjustment. Student satisfaction was lower with team-based learning, 2.45 versus 3.74 on a 5-point scale, p<.001. Survey responses suggested that the very small size (8-10 students) of our small groups influenced the preference for small-group learning. CONCLUSIONS: Team-based learning does not adversely affect examination performance. However, student satisfaction may be inferior, especially if compared to instruction in very small groups of 10 or fewer students.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Team-based learning is a large-group instructional modality intended to provide active learning with modest faculty resources. PURPOSE: The goal is to determine if team-based learning could be substituted for small-group learning in case sessions without compromising test performance or satisfaction. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-seven students were assigned to team-based or small-group learning for 6 case discussion sessions. Examination scores and student satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: Instruction modality had no meaningful effect on examination score, 81.7% team based versus 79.7% small-group, p=.56 after multivariate adjustment. Student satisfaction was lower with team-based learning, 2.45 versus 3.74 on a 5-point scale, p<.001. Survey responses suggested that the very small size (8-10 students) of our small groups influenced the preference for small-group learning. CONCLUSIONS: Team-based learning does not adversely affect examination performance. However, student satisfaction may be inferior, especially if compared to instruction in very small groups of 10 or fewer students.
Authors: Moritz Mahling; Alexander Münch; Sebastian Schenk; Stephan Volkert; Andreas Rein; Uwe Teichner; Pascal Piontek; Leopold Haffner; Daniel Heine; Andreas Manger; Jörg Reutershan; Peter Rosenberger; Anne Herrmann-Werner; Stephan Zipfel; Nora Celebi Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 2.463